Re: fs problem in 2.4.0-test10 -- oops in directory access

2000-11-07 Thread Matthew Hanselman
Many apologies, it's late and I ran the default ksymoops (0.7c) instead of ./ksymoops However, after running the real ksymoops against it, it gives nothing new; I suppose since 'ls' is dying and the stack is from 'ls', that's why. Is there anything else I should do before booting back to a 2.2.

Re: fs problem in 2.4.0-test10 -- oops in directory access

2000-11-07 Thread Keith Owens
On Wed, 8 Nov 2000 00:38:33 -0600 (CST), Matthew Hanselman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >I can poke around tomorrow morning without a reboot, but then I'll have to >reboot (so please respond via email if I can do anything). I tried >grinding the message through ksymoops-2.3.5, and it complains wit

fs problem in 2.4.0-test10 -- oops in directory access

2000-11-07 Thread Matthew Hanselman
I have a directory on my local filesystem that I cannot access on 2.4.0-test10. It happens when I try to "ls" in this bad directory, and ls segfaults. I can poke around tomorrow morning without a reboot, but then I'll have to reboot (so please respond via email if I can do anything). I tried gr