On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 12:40 PM, richard -rw- weinberger
wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 6:12 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 12:07 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>>> On Fri, 6 Sep 2013 11:46:13 -0400
>>> Josh Boyer wrote:
>>>
>>>
> Fedora should really look into defaulting to
On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 6:12 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 12:07 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>> On Fri, 6 Sep 2013 11:46:13 -0400
>> Josh Boyer wrote:
>>
>>
>>> > Fedora should really look into defaulting to syslinux.
>>>
>>> Doesn't support all the usecases we have, and it's not
On Fri, 6 Sep 2013 12:12:48 -0400
Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 12:07 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > On Fri, 6 Sep 2013 11:46:13 -0400
> > Josh Boyer wrote:
> >
> >
> >> > Fedora should really look into defaulting to syslinux.
> >>
> >> Doesn't support all the usecases we have, and
On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 11:34 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Sep 2013 11:22:21 -0400
> Dave Jones wrote:
>
>> Ugh, it's actually because my local install kernel script calls
>> grub2-mkconfig after installing a kernel to clean out old ones and not
>> clutter up the boot menu. (Which in
On Fri, 6 Sep 2013 11:46:13 -0400
Josh Boyer wrote:
> > Fedora should really look into defaulting to syslinux.
>
> Doesn't support all the usecases we have, and it's not multi-arch.
> Grub2 has warts, but it's all around more flexible.
We should be working on making syslinux work for all
On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 12:07 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Sep 2013 11:46:13 -0400
> Josh Boyer wrote:
>
>
>> > Fedora should really look into defaulting to syslinux.
>>
>> Doesn't support all the usecases we have, and it's not multi-arch.
>> Grub2 has warts, but it's all around more
On Fri, 6 Sep 2013 11:22:21 -0400
Dave Jones wrote:
> Ugh, it's actually because my local install kernel script calls
> grub2-mkconfig after installing a kernel to clean out old ones and not
> clutter up the boot menu. (Which in turn scans every disk using os-prober[*])
Fedora should really
On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 10:41:13AM -0400, Kyle McMartin wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 10:24:13AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> >
> > Is it really safe to load modules that were compiled with different
> > options?
>
> Certainly not, offsets can change based on config options.
>
> >
On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 10:24:13AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
> Is it really safe to load modules that were compiled with different
> options?
Certainly not, offsets can change based on config options.
> Sounds like a failure in the install scripts to me.
>
Definitely a bug in those
On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 09:32:52AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Sep 2013 23:58:27 -0400
> Dave Jones wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 09:51:54PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > > On Thu, 5 Sep 2013 21:48:59 -0400
> > > Dave Jones wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Thu, Sep
On Fri, 6 Sep 2013 10:18:52 -0400
Dave Jones wrote:
> > > 28b0 :
> > >
> > > return bh;
> > > }
> > >
> > > int reiserfs_init_bitmap_cache(struct super_block *sb)
> > > {
> > > 28b0: e8 00 00 00 00 callq 28b5
>
> >
> > That looks to be the
On Thu, 5 Sep 2013 23:58:27 -0400
Dave Jones wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 09:51:54PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > On Thu, 5 Sep 2013 21:48:59 -0400
> > Dave Jones wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 09:44:55PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 5 Sep 2013 21:34:55
On Thu, 5 Sep 2013 23:58:27 -0400
Dave Jones da...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 09:51:54PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
On Thu, 5 Sep 2013 21:48:59 -0400
Dave Jones da...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 09:44:55PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
On Thu, 5
On Fri, 6 Sep 2013 10:18:52 -0400
Dave Jones da...@redhat.com wrote:
28b0 reiserfs_init_bitmap_cache:
return bh;
}
int reiserfs_init_bitmap_cache(struct super_block *sb)
{
28b0: e8 00 00 00 00 callq 28b5
On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 09:32:52AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
On Thu, 5 Sep 2013 23:58:27 -0400
Dave Jones da...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 09:51:54PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
On Thu, 5 Sep 2013 21:48:59 -0400
Dave Jones da...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 10:24:13AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
Is it really safe to load modules that were compiled with different
options?
Certainly not, offsets can change based on config options.
Sounds like a failure in the install scripts to me.
Definitely a bug in those scripts,
On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 10:41:13AM -0400, Kyle McMartin wrote:
On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 10:24:13AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
Is it really safe to load modules that were compiled with different
options?
Certainly not, offsets can change based on config options.
Sounds like
On Fri, 6 Sep 2013 11:22:21 -0400
Dave Jones da...@redhat.com wrote:
Ugh, it's actually because my local install kernel script calls
grub2-mkconfig after installing a kernel to clean out old ones and not
clutter up the boot menu. (Which in turn scans every disk using os-prober[*])
Fedora
On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 12:07 PM, Steven Rostedt rost...@goodmis.org wrote:
On Fri, 6 Sep 2013 11:46:13 -0400
Josh Boyer jwbo...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Fedora should really look into defaulting to syslinux.
Doesn't support all the usecases we have, and it's not multi-arch.
Grub2 has
On Fri, 6 Sep 2013 11:46:13 -0400
Josh Boyer jwbo...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Fedora should really look into defaulting to syslinux.
Doesn't support all the usecases we have, and it's not multi-arch.
Grub2 has warts, but it's all around more flexible.
We should be working on making
On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 11:34 AM, Steven Rostedt rost...@goodmis.org wrote:
On Fri, 6 Sep 2013 11:22:21 -0400
Dave Jones da...@redhat.com wrote:
Ugh, it's actually because my local install kernel script calls
grub2-mkconfig after installing a kernel to clean out old ones and not
clutter up
On Fri, 6 Sep 2013 12:12:48 -0400
Josh Boyer jwbo...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 12:07 PM, Steven Rostedt rost...@goodmis.org wrote:
On Fri, 6 Sep 2013 11:46:13 -0400
Josh Boyer jwbo...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Fedora should really look into defaulting to syslinux.
On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 6:12 PM, Josh Boyer jwbo...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 12:07 PM, Steven Rostedt rost...@goodmis.org wrote:
On Fri, 6 Sep 2013 11:46:13 -0400
Josh Boyer jwbo...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Fedora should really look into defaulting to syslinux.
On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 12:40 PM, richard -rw- weinberger
richard.weinber...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 6:12 PM, Josh Boyer jwbo...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 12:07 PM, Steven Rostedt rost...@goodmis.org wrote:
On Fri, 6 Sep 2013 11:46:13 -0400
Josh Boyer
On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 09:51:54PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Sep 2013 21:48:59 -0400
> Dave Jones wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 09:44:55PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > > On Thu, 5 Sep 2013 21:34:55 -0400
> > > Dave Jones wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Thu, Sep
On Thu, 5 Sep 2013 21:48:59 -0400
Dave Jones wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 09:44:55PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > On Thu, 5 Sep 2013 21:34:55 -0400
> > Dave Jones wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 09:28:34PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > Did you change a config option,
On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 09:44:55PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Sep 2013 21:34:55 -0400
> Dave Jones wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 09:28:34PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > > On Thu, 5 Sep 2013 21:19:24 -0400
> > > Dave Jones wrote:
> > >
> > > > For whatever
On Thu, 5 Sep 2013 21:34:55 -0400
Dave Jones wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 09:28:34PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > On Thu, 5 Sep 2013 21:19:24 -0400
> > Dave Jones wrote:
> >
> > > For whatever dumb reason, when running 'make install' on a Fedora system,
> > > os-prober tries to
On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 09:28:34PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Sep 2013 21:19:24 -0400
> Dave Jones wrote:
>
> > For whatever dumb reason, when running 'make install' on a Fedora system,
> > os-prober tries to figure out what filesystems are needed by loading
> > filesystems,
On Thu, 5 Sep 2013 21:19:24 -0400
Dave Jones wrote:
> For whatever dumb reason, when running 'make install' on a Fedora system,
> os-prober tries to figure out what filesystems are needed by loading
> filesystems,
> and seeing what sticks.. Today it blew up spectacularly when it got to
>
For whatever dumb reason, when running 'make install' on a Fedora system,
os-prober tries to figure out what filesystems are needed by loading
filesystems,
and seeing what sticks.. Today it blew up spectacularly when it got to
loading reiserfs.. System wedged entirely afterwards.
Dave
For whatever dumb reason, when running 'make install' on a Fedora system,
os-prober tries to figure out what filesystems are needed by loading
filesystems,
and seeing what sticks.. Today it blew up spectacularly when it got to
loading reiserfs.. System wedged entirely afterwards.
Dave
On Thu, 5 Sep 2013 21:19:24 -0400
Dave Jones da...@redhat.com wrote:
For whatever dumb reason, when running 'make install' on a Fedora system,
os-prober tries to figure out what filesystems are needed by loading
filesystems,
and seeing what sticks.. Today it blew up spectacularly when it
On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 09:28:34PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
On Thu, 5 Sep 2013 21:19:24 -0400
Dave Jones da...@redhat.com wrote:
For whatever dumb reason, when running 'make install' on a Fedora system,
os-prober tries to figure out what filesystems are needed by loading
On Thu, 5 Sep 2013 21:34:55 -0400
Dave Jones da...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 09:28:34PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
On Thu, 5 Sep 2013 21:19:24 -0400
Dave Jones da...@redhat.com wrote:
For whatever dumb reason, when running 'make install' on a Fedora system,
On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 09:44:55PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
On Thu, 5 Sep 2013 21:34:55 -0400
Dave Jones da...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 09:28:34PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
On Thu, 5 Sep 2013 21:19:24 -0400
Dave Jones da...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, 5 Sep 2013 21:48:59 -0400
Dave Jones da...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 09:44:55PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
On Thu, 5 Sep 2013 21:34:55 -0400
Dave Jones da...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 09:28:34PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
Did you
On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 09:51:54PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
On Thu, 5 Sep 2013 21:48:59 -0400
Dave Jones da...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 09:44:55PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
On Thu, 5 Sep 2013 21:34:55 -0400
Dave Jones da...@redhat.com wrote:
38 matches
Mail list logo
