On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 5:33 AM, karol herbst wrote:
> 2016-05-06 12:16 GMT+02:00 Pekka Paalanen :
>> On Wed, 4 May 2016 14:17:13 -0500
>> Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>>
>>> 138295373ccf ("ftrace: mmiotrace update, #2") added this use of
>>> pci_resource_to_user():
>>>
>>> +static int mmio_print_pcidev
2016-05-06 12:16 GMT+02:00 Pekka Paalanen :
> On Wed, 4 May 2016 14:17:13 -0500
> Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>
>> 138295373ccf ("ftrace: mmiotrace update, #2") added this use of
>> pci_resource_to_user():
>>
>> +static int mmio_print_pcidev(struct trace_seq *s, const struct pci_dev
>> *dev)
>> +{
>
On Wed, 4 May 2016 14:17:13 -0500
Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> 138295373ccf ("ftrace: mmiotrace update, #2") added this use of
> pci_resource_to_user():
>
> +static int mmio_print_pcidev(struct trace_seq *s, const struct pci_dev
> *dev)
> +{
> ...
> + /*
> +* XXX: is pci_resou
On Wed, 4 May 2016 14:17:13 -0500
Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> 138295373ccf ("ftrace: mmiotrace update, #2") added this use of
> pci_resource_to_user():
>
> +static int mmio_print_pcidev(struct trace_seq *s, const struct pci_dev
> *dev)
> +{
> ...
> + /*
> +* XXX: is pci_resou
138295373ccf ("ftrace: mmiotrace update, #2") added this use of
pci_resource_to_user():
+static int mmio_print_pcidev(struct trace_seq *s, const struct pci_dev *dev)
+{
...
+ /*
+* XXX: is pci_resource_to_user() appropriate, since we are
+* supposed to interpret t
5 matches
Mail list logo