Re: gcc-4.2.0 breakage on powerpc?

2007-05-19 Thread Mikael Pettersson
On Sat, 19 May 2007 18:11:20 +0200, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > and we'll end up > having major kernel releases which don't build on i386 with major > gcc > releases, which isn't altogether desirable. > >>> > >>> Yeah, like 4.2.0 with powerpc. Seems like no one tested it :-(

Re: gcc-4.2.0 breakage on powerpc?

2007-05-19 Thread Segher Boessenkool
Over here, the 2.6.21.1 Kernel _builds_ fine with gcc-4.2.0 on an mpc8540 e500 powerpc (mpc8540_ads_defconfig) Yeah, this problem likely doesn't show up on 32-bit platforms. but it just crashes silently on boot. But that's IMHO a DeviceTree/U-Boot issue I haven't solved yet. Quite

Re: gcc-4.2.0 breakage on powerpc?

2007-05-19 Thread Segher Boessenkool
and we'll end up having major kernel releases which don't build on i386 with major gcc releases, which isn't altogether desirable. Yeah, like 4.2.0 with powerpc. Seems like no one tested it :-( Details please. What exactly are the gcc-4.2.0 problems on powerpc? http://gcc.gnu.org/PR31490

Re: gcc-4.2.0 breakage on powerpc?

2007-05-19 Thread Clemens Koller
Mikael Pettersson schrieb: On Sat, 19 May 2007 01:39:43 +0200, Segher Boessenkool wrote: and we'll end up having major kernel releases which don't build on i386 with major gcc releases, which isn't altogether desirable. Yeah, like 4.2.0 with powerpc. Seems like no one tested it :-( Details

Re: gcc-4.2.0 breakage on powerpc?

2007-05-19 Thread Segher Boessenkool
and we'll end up having major kernel releases which don't build on i386 with major gcc releases, which isn't altogether desirable. Yeah, like 4.2.0 with powerpc. Seems like no one tested it :-( Details please. What exactly are the gcc-4.2.0 problems on powerpc? http://gcc.gnu.org/PR31490 .

gcc-4.2.0 breakage on powerpc?

2007-05-19 Thread Mikael Pettersson
On Sat, 19 May 2007 01:39:43 +0200, Segher Boessenkool wrote: >> and we'll end up >> having major kernel releases which don't build on i386 with major gcc >> releases, which isn't altogether desirable. > >Yeah, like 4.2.0 with powerpc. Seems like no one tested it :-( Details please. What exactly

gcc-4.2.0 breakage on powerpc?

2007-05-19 Thread Mikael Pettersson
On Sat, 19 May 2007 01:39:43 +0200, Segher Boessenkool wrote: and we'll end up having major kernel releases which don't build on i386 with major gcc releases, which isn't altogether desirable. Yeah, like 4.2.0 with powerpc. Seems like no one tested it :-( Details please. What exactly are the

Re: gcc-4.2.0 breakage on powerpc?

2007-05-19 Thread Segher Boessenkool
and we'll end up having major kernel releases which don't build on i386 with major gcc releases, which isn't altogether desirable. Yeah, like 4.2.0 with powerpc. Seems like no one tested it :-( Details please. What exactly are the gcc-4.2.0 problems on powerpc? http://gcc.gnu.org/PR31490 .

Re: gcc-4.2.0 breakage on powerpc?

2007-05-19 Thread Clemens Koller
Mikael Pettersson schrieb: On Sat, 19 May 2007 01:39:43 +0200, Segher Boessenkool wrote: and we'll end up having major kernel releases which don't build on i386 with major gcc releases, which isn't altogether desirable. Yeah, like 4.2.0 with powerpc. Seems like no one tested it :-( Details

Re: gcc-4.2.0 breakage on powerpc?

2007-05-19 Thread Segher Boessenkool
and we'll end up having major kernel releases which don't build on i386 with major gcc releases, which isn't altogether desirable. Yeah, like 4.2.0 with powerpc. Seems like no one tested it :-( Details please. What exactly are the gcc-4.2.0 problems on powerpc? http://gcc.gnu.org/PR31490

Re: gcc-4.2.0 breakage on powerpc?

2007-05-19 Thread Segher Boessenkool
Over here, the 2.6.21.1 Kernel _builds_ fine with gcc-4.2.0 on an mpc8540 e500 powerpc (mpc8540_ads_defconfig) Yeah, this problem likely doesn't show up on 32-bit platforms. but it just crashes silently on boot. But that's IMHO a DeviceTree/U-Boot issue I haven't solved yet. Quite

Re: gcc-4.2.0 breakage on powerpc?

2007-05-19 Thread Mikael Pettersson
On Sat, 19 May 2007 18:11:20 +0200, Segher Boessenkool wrote: and we'll end up having major kernel releases which don't build on i386 with major gcc releases, which isn't altogether desirable. Yeah, like 4.2.0 with powerpc. Seems like no one tested it :-( Details please. What