On Sat, 19 May 2007 18:11:20 +0200, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> and we'll end up
> having major kernel releases which don't build on i386 with major
> gcc
> releases, which isn't altogether desirable.
> >>>
> >>> Yeah, like 4.2.0 with powerpc. Seems like no one tested it :-(
Over here, the 2.6.21.1 Kernel _builds_ fine with gcc-4.2.0 on an
mpc8540 e500 powerpc
(mpc8540_ads_defconfig)
Yeah, this problem likely doesn't show up on 32-bit platforms.
but it just crashes silently on boot. But that's IMHO a
DeviceTree/U-Boot issue I haven't solved yet.
Quite
and we'll end up
having major kernel releases which don't build on i386 with major
gcc
releases, which isn't altogether desirable.
Yeah, like 4.2.0 with powerpc. Seems like no one tested it :-(
Details please. What exactly are the gcc-4.2.0 problems on powerpc?
http://gcc.gnu.org/PR31490
Mikael Pettersson schrieb:
On Sat, 19 May 2007 01:39:43 +0200, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
and we'll end up
having major kernel releases which don't build on i386 with major gcc
releases, which isn't altogether desirable.
Yeah, like 4.2.0 with powerpc. Seems like no one tested it :-(
Details
and we'll end up
having major kernel releases which don't build on i386 with major gcc
releases, which isn't altogether desirable.
Yeah, like 4.2.0 with powerpc. Seems like no one tested it :-(
Details please. What exactly are the gcc-4.2.0 problems on powerpc?
http://gcc.gnu.org/PR31490 .
On Sat, 19 May 2007 01:39:43 +0200, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
>> and we'll end up
>> having major kernel releases which don't build on i386 with major gcc
>> releases, which isn't altogether desirable.
>
>Yeah, like 4.2.0 with powerpc. Seems like no one tested it :-(
Details please. What exactly
On Sat, 19 May 2007 01:39:43 +0200, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
and we'll end up
having major kernel releases which don't build on i386 with major gcc
releases, which isn't altogether desirable.
Yeah, like 4.2.0 with powerpc. Seems like no one tested it :-(
Details please. What exactly are the
and we'll end up
having major kernel releases which don't build on i386 with major gcc
releases, which isn't altogether desirable.
Yeah, like 4.2.0 with powerpc. Seems like no one tested it :-(
Details please. What exactly are the gcc-4.2.0 problems on powerpc?
http://gcc.gnu.org/PR31490 .
Mikael Pettersson schrieb:
On Sat, 19 May 2007 01:39:43 +0200, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
and we'll end up
having major kernel releases which don't build on i386 with major gcc
releases, which isn't altogether desirable.
Yeah, like 4.2.0 with powerpc. Seems like no one tested it :-(
Details
and we'll end up
having major kernel releases which don't build on i386 with major
gcc
releases, which isn't altogether desirable.
Yeah, like 4.2.0 with powerpc. Seems like no one tested it :-(
Details please. What exactly are the gcc-4.2.0 problems on powerpc?
http://gcc.gnu.org/PR31490
Over here, the 2.6.21.1 Kernel _builds_ fine with gcc-4.2.0 on an
mpc8540 e500 powerpc
(mpc8540_ads_defconfig)
Yeah, this problem likely doesn't show up on 32-bit platforms.
but it just crashes silently on boot. But that's IMHO a
DeviceTree/U-Boot issue I haven't solved yet.
Quite
On Sat, 19 May 2007 18:11:20 +0200, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
and we'll end up
having major kernel releases which don't build on i386 with major
gcc
releases, which isn't altogether desirable.
Yeah, like 4.2.0 with powerpc. Seems like no one tested it :-(
Details please. What
12 matches
Mail list logo