Re: getting oom/stalls for ltp test cpuset01 with latest/4.9 kernel

2017-01-17 Thread Vlastimil Babka
On 01/16/2017 02:22 PM, Vlastimil Babka wrote: >>> >>> no_zone: >>> -- >>> 2.11.0 >>> >> >> this patch did not fix the issue. >> issue still exists! > > Hmm, that's unfortunate. > >> i did bisect and this test passes in 4.4,4.5 and 4.6 >> test failing since 4.7-rc1 > > 4.7 would match the

Re: getting oom/stalls for ltp test cpuset01 with latest/4.9 kernel

2017-01-17 Thread Vlastimil Babka
On 01/16/2017 02:22 PM, Vlastimil Babka wrote: >>> >>> no_zone: >>> -- >>> 2.11.0 >>> >> >> this patch did not fix the issue. >> issue still exists! > > Hmm, that's unfortunate. > >> i did bisect and this test passes in 4.4,4.5 and 4.6 >> test failing since 4.7-rc1 > > 4.7 would match the

Re: getting oom/stalls for ltp test cpuset01 with latest/4.9 kernel

2017-01-16 Thread Vlastimil Babka
On 01/16/2017 11:41 AM, Ganapatrao Kulkarni wrote: > On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 2:36 PM, Vlastimil Babka wrote: >> On 01/13/2017 05:35 AM, Ganapatrao Kulkarni wrote: >>> On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 4:40 PM, Vlastimil Babka wrote: On 01/11/2017 05:46 PM, Michal Hocko

Re: getting oom/stalls for ltp test cpuset01 with latest/4.9 kernel

2017-01-16 Thread Vlastimil Babka
On 01/16/2017 11:41 AM, Ganapatrao Kulkarni wrote: > On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 2:36 PM, Vlastimil Babka wrote: >> On 01/13/2017 05:35 AM, Ganapatrao Kulkarni wrote: >>> On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 4:40 PM, Vlastimil Babka wrote: On 01/11/2017 05:46 PM, Michal Hocko wrote: > > On Wed

Re: getting oom/stalls for ltp test cpuset01 with latest/4.9 kernel

2017-01-16 Thread Ganapatrao Kulkarni
On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 2:36 PM, Vlastimil Babka wrote: > On 01/13/2017 05:35 AM, Ganapatrao Kulkarni wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 4:40 PM, Vlastimil Babka wrote: >>> On 01/11/2017 05:46 PM, Michal Hocko wrote: On Wed 11-01-17 21:52:29, Ganapatrao

Re: getting oom/stalls for ltp test cpuset01 with latest/4.9 kernel

2017-01-16 Thread Ganapatrao Kulkarni
On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 2:36 PM, Vlastimil Babka wrote: > On 01/13/2017 05:35 AM, Ganapatrao Kulkarni wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 4:40 PM, Vlastimil Babka wrote: >>> On 01/11/2017 05:46 PM, Michal Hocko wrote: On Wed 11-01-17 21:52:29, Ganapatrao Kulkarni wrote: > [

Re: getting oom/stalls for ltp test cpuset01 with latest/4.9 kernel

2017-01-13 Thread Michal Hocko
On Fri 13-01-17 10:06:14, Vlastimil Babka wrote: [...] > >From 9f041839401681f2678edf5040c851d11963c5fe Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Vlastimil Babka > Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2017 10:01:26 +0100 > Subject: [PATCH] mm, page_alloc: fix race with cpuset update or removal > > Changelog

Re: getting oom/stalls for ltp test cpuset01 with latest/4.9 kernel

2017-01-13 Thread Michal Hocko
On Fri 13-01-17 10:06:14, Vlastimil Babka wrote: [...] > >From 9f041839401681f2678edf5040c851d11963c5fe Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Vlastimil Babka > Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2017 10:01:26 +0100 > Subject: [PATCH] mm, page_alloc: fix race with cpuset update or removal > > Changelog and S-O-B TBD.

Re: getting oom/stalls for ltp test cpuset01 with latest/4.9 kernel

2017-01-13 Thread Vlastimil Babka
On 01/13/2017 05:35 AM, Ganapatrao Kulkarni wrote: > On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 4:40 PM, Vlastimil Babka wrote: >> On 01/11/2017 05:46 PM, Michal Hocko wrote: >>> >>> On Wed 11-01-17 21:52:29, Ganapatrao Kulkarni wrote: >>> [ 2398.169391] Node 1 Normal: 951*4kB (UME) 1308*8kB

Re: getting oom/stalls for ltp test cpuset01 with latest/4.9 kernel

2017-01-13 Thread Vlastimil Babka
On 01/13/2017 05:35 AM, Ganapatrao Kulkarni wrote: > On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 4:40 PM, Vlastimil Babka wrote: >> On 01/11/2017 05:46 PM, Michal Hocko wrote: >>> >>> On Wed 11-01-17 21:52:29, Ganapatrao Kulkarni wrote: >>> [ 2398.169391] Node 1 Normal: 951*4kB (UME) 1308*8kB (UME) 1034*16kB

Re: getting oom/stalls for ltp test cpuset01 with latest/4.9 kernel

2017-01-12 Thread Ganapatrao Kulkarni
On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 4:40 PM, Vlastimil Babka wrote: > On 01/11/2017 05:46 PM, Michal Hocko wrote: >> >> On Wed 11-01-17 21:52:29, Ganapatrao Kulkarni wrote: >> >>> [ 2398.169391] Node 1 Normal: 951*4kB (UME) 1308*8kB (UME) 1034*16kB >>> (UME) 742*32kB (UME) 581*64kB (UME)

Re: getting oom/stalls for ltp test cpuset01 with latest/4.9 kernel

2017-01-12 Thread Ganapatrao Kulkarni
On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 4:40 PM, Vlastimil Babka wrote: > On 01/11/2017 05:46 PM, Michal Hocko wrote: >> >> On Wed 11-01-17 21:52:29, Ganapatrao Kulkarni wrote: >> >>> [ 2398.169391] Node 1 Normal: 951*4kB (UME) 1308*8kB (UME) 1034*16kB >>> (UME) 742*32kB (UME) 581*64kB (UME) 450*128kB (UME)

Re: getting oom/stalls for ltp test cpuset01 with latest/4.9 kernel

2017-01-12 Thread Vlastimil Babka
On 01/11/2017 05:46 PM, Michal Hocko wrote: On Wed 11-01-17 21:52:29, Ganapatrao Kulkarni wrote: [ 2398.169391] Node 1 Normal: 951*4kB (UME) 1308*8kB (UME) 1034*16kB (UME) 742*32kB (UME) 581*64kB (UME) 450*128kB (UME) 362*256kB (UME) 275*512kB (ME) 189*1024kB (UM) 117*2048kB (ME) 2742*4096kB

Re: getting oom/stalls for ltp test cpuset01 with latest/4.9 kernel

2017-01-12 Thread Vlastimil Babka
On 01/11/2017 05:46 PM, Michal Hocko wrote: On Wed 11-01-17 21:52:29, Ganapatrao Kulkarni wrote: [ 2398.169391] Node 1 Normal: 951*4kB (UME) 1308*8kB (UME) 1034*16kB (UME) 742*32kB (UME) 581*64kB (UME) 450*128kB (UME) 362*256kB (UME) 275*512kB (ME) 189*1024kB (UM) 117*2048kB (ME) 2742*4096kB

Re: getting oom/stalls for ltp test cpuset01 with latest/4.9 kernel

2017-01-11 Thread Michal Hocko
On Wed 11-01-17 21:52:29, Ganapatrao Kulkarni wrote: [...] > [ 2397.331098] cpuset01 invoked oom-killer: > gfp_mask=0x24280ca(GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE|__GFP_ZERO), nodemask=1, order=0, > oom_score_adj=0 > [ 2397.331100] cpuset01 cpuset=1 mems_allowed=1 [...] > [ 2397.331206] Node 1

Re: getting oom/stalls for ltp test cpuset01 with latest/4.9 kernel

2017-01-11 Thread Michal Hocko
On Wed 11-01-17 21:52:29, Ganapatrao Kulkarni wrote: [...] > [ 2397.331098] cpuset01 invoked oom-killer: > gfp_mask=0x24280ca(GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE|__GFP_ZERO), nodemask=1, order=0, > oom_score_adj=0 > [ 2397.331100] cpuset01 cpuset=1 mems_allowed=1 [...] > [ 2397.331206] Node 1

Re: getting oom/stalls for ltp test cpuset01 with latest/4.9 kernel

2017-01-11 Thread Michal Hocko
On Wed 11-01-17 12:05:44, Vlastimil Babka wrote: > On 01/11/2017 11:50 AM, Ganapatrao Kulkarni wrote: > > Hi, > > > > we are seeing OOM/stalls messages when we run ltp cpuset01(cpuset01 -I > > 360) test for few minutes, even through the numa system has adequate > > memory on both nodes. > > > >

Re: getting oom/stalls for ltp test cpuset01 with latest/4.9 kernel

2017-01-11 Thread Michal Hocko
On Wed 11-01-17 12:05:44, Vlastimil Babka wrote: > On 01/11/2017 11:50 AM, Ganapatrao Kulkarni wrote: > > Hi, > > > > we are seeing OOM/stalls messages when we run ltp cpuset01(cpuset01 -I > > 360) test for few minutes, even through the numa system has adequate > > memory on both nodes. > > > >

Re: getting oom/stalls for ltp test cpuset01 with latest/4.9 kernel

2017-01-11 Thread Michal Hocko
On Wed 11-01-17 16:20:45, Ganapatrao Kulkarni wrote: > Hi, > > we are seeing OOM/stalls messages when we run ltp cpuset01(cpuset01 -I > 360) test for few minutes, even through the numa system has adequate > memory on both nodes. > > this we have observed same on both arm64/thunderx numa and on

Re: getting oom/stalls for ltp test cpuset01 with latest/4.9 kernel

2017-01-11 Thread Michal Hocko
On Wed 11-01-17 16:20:45, Ganapatrao Kulkarni wrote: > Hi, > > we are seeing OOM/stalls messages when we run ltp cpuset01(cpuset01 -I > 360) test for few minutes, even through the numa system has adequate > memory on both nodes. > > this we have observed same on both arm64/thunderx numa and on

Re: getting oom/stalls for ltp test cpuset01 with latest/4.9 kernel

2017-01-11 Thread Vlastimil Babka
On 01/11/2017 12:05 PM, Vlastimil Babka wrote: > On 01/11/2017 11:50 AM, Ganapatrao Kulkarni wrote: >> Hi, >> >> we are seeing OOM/stalls messages when we run ltp cpuset01(cpuset01 -I >> 360) test for few minutes, even through the numa system has adequate >> memory on both nodes. >> >> this we

Re: getting oom/stalls for ltp test cpuset01 with latest/4.9 kernel

2017-01-11 Thread Vlastimil Babka
On 01/11/2017 12:05 PM, Vlastimil Babka wrote: > On 01/11/2017 11:50 AM, Ganapatrao Kulkarni wrote: >> Hi, >> >> we are seeing OOM/stalls messages when we run ltp cpuset01(cpuset01 -I >> 360) test for few minutes, even through the numa system has adequate >> memory on both nodes. >> >> this we

Re: getting oom/stalls for ltp test cpuset01 with latest/4.9 kernel

2017-01-11 Thread Vlastimil Babka
On 01/11/2017 11:50 AM, Ganapatrao Kulkarni wrote: > Hi, > > we are seeing OOM/stalls messages when we run ltp cpuset01(cpuset01 -I > 360) test for few minutes, even through the numa system has adequate > memory on both nodes. > > this we have observed same on both arm64/thunderx numa and on x86

Re: getting oom/stalls for ltp test cpuset01 with latest/4.9 kernel

2017-01-11 Thread Vlastimil Babka
On 01/11/2017 11:50 AM, Ganapatrao Kulkarni wrote: > Hi, > > we are seeing OOM/stalls messages when we run ltp cpuset01(cpuset01 -I > 360) test for few minutes, even through the numa system has adequate > memory on both nodes. > > this we have observed same on both arm64/thunderx numa and on x86

getting oom/stalls for ltp test cpuset01 with latest/4.9 kernel

2017-01-11 Thread Ganapatrao Kulkarni
Hi, we are seeing OOM/stalls messages when we run ltp cpuset01(cpuset01 -I 360) test for few minutes, even through the numa system has adequate memory on both nodes. this we have observed same on both arm64/thunderx numa and on x86 numa system! using latest ltp from master branch version

getting oom/stalls for ltp test cpuset01 with latest/4.9 kernel

2017-01-11 Thread Ganapatrao Kulkarni
Hi, we are seeing OOM/stalls messages when we run ltp cpuset01(cpuset01 -I 360) test for few minutes, even through the numa system has adequate memory on both nodes. this we have observed same on both arm64/thunderx numa and on x86 numa system! using latest ltp from master branch version