Re: gitweb: kernel versions in the history (feature request, probably)

Petr Baudis wrote, On 11/21/2007 04:18 PM: > On Wed, Nov 21, 2007 at 08:52:17AM +0100, Jarek Poplawski wrote: >> ... >> tags >> 4 days ago v2.6.24-rc3 Linux 2.6.24-rc3 >> 2 weeks ago v2.6.24-rc2 Linux 2.6.24-rc2 >> 4 weeks ago v2.6.24-rc1 Linux 2.6.24-rc1 >> 6 weeks ago v2.6.23

Re: gitweb: kernel versions in the history (feature request, probably)

Kay Sievers wrote, On 11/21/2007 05:06 PM: > On Nov 21, 2007 8:52 AM, Jarek Poplawski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Tue, Nov 20, 2007 at 10:20:09PM -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote: >>> On Wed, Nov 21, 2007 at 12:30:23AM +0100, Jarek Poplawski wrote: I don't know git, but it seems, at least

Re: gitweb: kernel versions in the history (feature request, probably)

Petr Baudis wrote: > On Wed, Nov 21, 2007 at 08:52:17AM +0100, Jarek Poplawski wrote: >> ... >> tags >> 4 days ago v2.6.24-rc3 Linux 2.6.24-rc3 >> 2 weeks ago v2.6.24-rc2 Linux 2.6.24-rc2 >> 4 weeks ago v2.6.24-rc1 Linux 2.6.24-rc1 >> 6 weeks ago v2.6.23 Linux 2.6.23 >>

Re: gitweb: kernel versions in the history (feature request, probably)

On Nov 21, 2007 8:52 AM, Jarek Poplawski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 20, 2007 at 10:20:09PM -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 21, 2007 at 12:30:23AM +0100, Jarek Poplawski wrote: > > > I don't know git, but it seems, at least if done for web only, this > > > shouldn't be

Re: gitweb: kernel versions in the history (feature request, probably)

On Wed, Nov 21, 2007 at 08:52:17AM +0100, Jarek Poplawski wrote: > ... > tags > 4 days agov2.6.24-rc3 Linux 2.6.24-rc3 > 2 weeks ago v2.6.24-rc2 Linux 2.6.24-rc2 > 4 weeks ago v2.6.24-rc1 Linux 2.6.24-rc1 > 6 weeks ago v2.6.23 Linux 2.6.23 > > which drives me crazy,

Re: gitweb: kernel versions in the history (feature request, probably)

On Wed, Nov 21, 2007 at 08:52:17AM +0100, Jarek Poplawski wrote: ... > Of course, you are right, and I probably miss something, but to be > sure we think about the same thing let's look at some example: so, I > open a page with current Linus' tree, go to something titled: > /pub/scm /

Re: gitweb: kernel versions in the history (feature request, probably)

On Wed, Nov 21, 2007 at 08:52:17AM +0100, Jarek Poplawski wrote: ... Of course, you are right, and I probably miss something, but to be sure we think about the same thing let's look at some example: so, I open a page with current Linus' tree, go to something titled: /pub/scm /

Re: gitweb: kernel versions in the history (feature request, probably)

On Wed, Nov 21, 2007 at 08:52:17AM +0100, Jarek Poplawski wrote: ... tags 4 days agov2.6.24-rc3 Linux 2.6.24-rc3 2 weeks ago v2.6.24-rc2 Linux 2.6.24-rc2 4 weeks ago v2.6.24-rc1 Linux 2.6.24-rc1 6 weeks ago v2.6.23 Linux 2.6.23 which drives me crazy, because,

Re: gitweb: kernel versions in the history (feature request, probably)

On Nov 21, 2007 8:52 AM, Jarek Poplawski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Nov 20, 2007 at 10:20:09PM -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote: On Wed, Nov 21, 2007 at 12:30:23AM +0100, Jarek Poplawski wrote: I don't know git, but it seems, at least if done for web only, this shouldn't be so 'heavy'.

Re: gitweb: kernel versions in the history (feature request, probably)

Petr Baudis wrote: On Wed, Nov 21, 2007 at 08:52:17AM +0100, Jarek Poplawski wrote: ... tags 4 days ago v2.6.24-rc3 Linux 2.6.24-rc3 2 weeks ago v2.6.24-rc2 Linux 2.6.24-rc2 4 weeks ago v2.6.24-rc1 Linux 2.6.24-rc1 6 weeks ago v2.6.23 Linux 2.6.23 which drives

Re: gitweb: kernel versions in the history (feature request, probably)

Kay Sievers wrote, On 11/21/2007 05:06 PM: On Nov 21, 2007 8:52 AM, Jarek Poplawski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Nov 20, 2007 at 10:20:09PM -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote: On Wed, Nov 21, 2007 at 12:30:23AM +0100, Jarek Poplawski wrote: I don't know git, but it seems, at least if done for

Re: gitweb: kernel versions in the history (feature request, probably)

Petr Baudis wrote, On 11/21/2007 04:18 PM: On Wed, Nov 21, 2007 at 08:52:17AM +0100, Jarek Poplawski wrote: ... tags 4 days ago v2.6.24-rc3 Linux 2.6.24-rc3 2 weeks ago v2.6.24-rc2 Linux 2.6.24-rc2 4 weeks ago v2.6.24-rc1 Linux 2.6.24-rc1 6 weeks ago v2.6.23 Linux

Re: gitweb: kernel versions in the history (feature request, probably)

On Tue, Nov 20, 2007 at 10:20:09PM -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > On Wed, Nov 21, 2007 at 12:30:23AM +0100, Jarek Poplawski wrote: > > I don't know git, but it seems, at least if done for web only, this > > shouldn't be so 'heavy'. It could be a 'simple' translation of commit > > date by querying

Re: gitweb: kernel versions in the history (feature request, probably)

On Wed, Nov 21, 2007 at 12:30:23AM +0100, Jarek Poplawski wrote: > I don't know git, but it seems, at least if done for web only, this > shouldn't be so 'heavy'. It could be a 'simple' translation of commit > date by querying a small database with kernel versions & dates. If I create a commit in

Re: gitweb: kernel versions in the history (feature request, probably)

Petr Baudis wrote, On 11/20/2007 10:59 PM: > Hi, > > On Tue, Nov 20, 2007 at 03:20:42PM +0100, Jarek Poplawski wrote: >> I see gitweb is much more usable (faster) than a few months ago, but >> there is one thing a bit problematic: in the history of patches I'm >> very often interested in which

Re: gitweb: kernel versions in the history (feature request, probably)

Hi, On Tue, Nov 20, 2007 at 03:20:42PM +0100, Jarek Poplawski wrote: > I see gitweb is much more usable (faster) than a few months ago, but > there is one thing a bit problematic: in the history of patches I'm > very often interested in which kernel version of Linus' tree the patch > appeared

gitweb: kernel versions in the history (feature request, probably)

Hi, I see gitweb is much more usable (faster) than a few months ago, but there is one thing a bit problematic: in the history of patches I'm very often interested in which kernel version of Linus' tree the patch appeared for the first time. If it's not some big problem, and maybe somebody else

gitweb: kernel versions in the history (feature request, probably)

Hi, I see gitweb is much more usable (faster) than a few months ago, but there is one thing a bit problematic: in the history of patches I'm very often interested in which kernel version of Linus' tree the patch appeared for the first time. If it's not some big problem, and maybe somebody else

Re: gitweb: kernel versions in the history (feature request, probably)

Hi, On Tue, Nov 20, 2007 at 03:20:42PM +0100, Jarek Poplawski wrote: I see gitweb is much more usable (faster) than a few months ago, but there is one thing a bit problematic: in the history of patches I'm very often interested in which kernel version of Linus' tree the patch appeared for

Re: gitweb: kernel versions in the history (feature request, probably)

Petr Baudis wrote, On 11/20/2007 10:59 PM: Hi, On Tue, Nov 20, 2007 at 03:20:42PM +0100, Jarek Poplawski wrote: I see gitweb is much more usable (faster) than a few months ago, but there is one thing a bit problematic: in the history of patches I'm very often interested in which kernel

Re: gitweb: kernel versions in the history (feature request, probably)

On Wed, Nov 21, 2007 at 12:30:23AM +0100, Jarek Poplawski wrote: I don't know git, but it seems, at least if done for web only, this shouldn't be so 'heavy'. It could be a 'simple' translation of commit date by querying a small database with kernel versions dates. If I create a commit in my

Re: gitweb: kernel versions in the history (feature request, probably)

On Tue, Nov 20, 2007 at 10:20:09PM -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote: On Wed, Nov 21, 2007 at 12:30:23AM +0100, Jarek Poplawski wrote: I don't know git, but it seems, at least if done for web only, this shouldn't be so 'heavy'. It could be a 'simple' translation of commit date by querying a