Re: hpet_late_init hang

2008-01-18 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Balaji Rao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ingo, here's the patch with the SOB. Please apply. thanks - reinstated your original patch and added your fix too. I added: Signed-off-by: Balaji Rao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Tested-by: Yinghai Lu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Ingo -- To unsubscribe from

Re: hpet_late_init hang

2008-01-18 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Balaji Rao [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ingo, here's the patch with the SOB. Please apply. thanks - reinstated your original patch and added your fix too. I added: Signed-off-by: Balaji Rao [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tested-by: Yinghai Lu [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this

Re: hpet_late_init hang

2008-01-17 Thread Balaji Rao
On Thursday 17 January 2008 03:09:42 am Yinghai Lu wrote: > > Looks like IRQ 31 is assigned to timer 3, even without the patch! I wonder > > who wrote the number 31. But the manual says > > that it is zero by default. > > > > I think we should check whether the timer has been allocated an IRQ

Re: hpet_late_init hang

2008-01-17 Thread Balaji Rao
On Thursday 17 January 2008 03:09:42 am Yinghai Lu wrote: Looks like IRQ 31 is assigned to timer 3, even without the patch! I wonder who wrote the number 31. But the manual says that it is zero by default. I think we should check whether the timer has been allocated an IRQ before

Re: hpet_late_init hang

2008-01-16 Thread Yinghai Lu
On Jan 16, 2008 12:34 AM, Balaji Rao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wednesday 16 January 2008 12:21:33 pm Ingo Molnar wrote: > Hi Ingo, > > * Yinghai Lu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > " > > > commit e5ed385fa0d6f35406e3e3ed75e5eb9adeb811df > > > Author: Balaji Rao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >

Re: hpet_late_init hang

2008-01-16 Thread Balaji Rao
On Wednesday 16 January 2008 12:21:33 pm Ingo Molnar wrote: Hi Ingo, > * Yinghai Lu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > " > > commit e5ed385fa0d6f35406e3e3ed75e5eb9adeb811df > > Author: Balaji Rao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Date: Tue Jan 15 16:53:29 2008 +0100 > > > > Assign IRQs to HPET Timers > >

Re: hpet_late_init hang

2008-01-16 Thread Balaji Rao
On Wednesday 16 January 2008 12:21:33 pm Ingo Molnar wrote: Hi Ingo, * Yinghai Lu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: commit e5ed385fa0d6f35406e3e3ed75e5eb9adeb811df Author: Balaji Rao [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue Jan 15 16:53:29 2008 +0100 Assign IRQs to HPET Timers in x86.git

Re: hpet_late_init hang

2008-01-16 Thread Yinghai Lu
On Jan 16, 2008 12:34 AM, Balaji Rao [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wednesday 16 January 2008 12:21:33 pm Ingo Molnar wrote: Hi Ingo, * Yinghai Lu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: commit e5ed385fa0d6f35406e3e3ed75e5eb9adeb811df Author: Balaji Rao [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue Jan 15 16:53:29

Re: hpet_late_init hang

2008-01-15 Thread Ingo Molnar
(Balaji Cc:-ed) * Yinghai Lu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > " > commit e5ed385fa0d6f35406e3e3ed75e5eb9adeb811df > Author: Balaji Rao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Tue Jan 15 16:53:29 2008 +0100 > > Assign IRQs to HPET Timers > " > in x86.git > > cause my servers hang > after > Calling

hpet_late_init hang

2008-01-15 Thread Yinghai Lu
" commit e5ed385fa0d6f35406e3e3ed75e5eb9adeb811df Author: Balaji Rao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue Jan 15 16:53:29 2008 +0100 Assign IRQs to HPET Timers " in x86.git cause my servers hang after Calling initcall 0x80b9a465: hpet_late_init+0x0/0x100() after reverting that I got:

hpet_late_init hang

2008-01-15 Thread Yinghai Lu
commit e5ed385fa0d6f35406e3e3ed75e5eb9adeb811df Author: Balaji Rao [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue Jan 15 16:53:29 2008 +0100 Assign IRQs to HPET Timers in x86.git cause my servers hang after Calling initcall 0x80b9a465: hpet_late_init+0x0/0x100() after reverting that I got:

Re: hpet_late_init hang

2008-01-15 Thread Ingo Molnar
(Balaji Cc:-ed) * Yinghai Lu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: commit e5ed385fa0d6f35406e3e3ed75e5eb9adeb811df Author: Balaji Rao [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue Jan 15 16:53:29 2008 +0100 Assign IRQs to HPET Timers in x86.git cause my servers hang after Calling initcall