I experienced this same thing (with an HPT too, I might say), and the
problem seemed to be an underpowered system. Replaced the power supply
and the problem went away.
My box had 7 HDs, all of them worked fine using a different system but I
got these errors when they where together. I thought
I experienced this same thing (with an HPT too, I might say), and the
problem seemed to be an underpowered system. Replaced the power supply
and the problem went away.
My box had 7 HDs, all of them worked fine using a different system but I
got these errors when they where together. I thought
On Sad, 2005-07-23 at 14:28 +1200, mdew wrote:
> I'm unable to mount an ext2 drive using the hpt370A raid card.
>
> upon mounting the drive, dmesg will spew these errors..I've tried
> different cables and drive is fine.
> Jul 23 01:30:21 localhost kernel: hdf: dma timeout error: status=0x25
> {
On Gwe, 2005-07-22 at 22:47 -0400, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Does vanilla kernel 2.6.12 work for you?
> It doesn't contain hpt366 driver update.
Its nothing to do with the driver. Read the trace Bartlomiej
> > Jul 23 01:30:21 localhost kernel: hdf: dma timeout error:
On Sat, Jul 23, 2005 at 11:50:43PM +1200, mdew wrote:
> looks like 2.6.12 does the same sort of thing..
>
As a data-point, my dual HPT374 controllers are fine with
2.6.13-rc3-mm1. One onboard, one in a pci-slot in an Epox 4PCA3+ (socket
478, i875 chipset) motherboard.
Linux adsl-gate
looks like 2.6.12 does the same sort of thing..
On 7/23/05, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Does vanilla kernel 2.6.12 work for you?
> It doesn't contain hpt366 driver update.
>
> Bartlomiej
>
> On 7/22/05, mdew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'm unable to mount
looks like 2.6.12 does the same sort of thing..
On 7/23/05, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Does vanilla kernel 2.6.12 work for you?
It doesn't contain hpt366 driver update.
Bartlomiej
On 7/22/05, mdew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm unable to mount an ext2 drive
On Sat, Jul 23, 2005 at 11:50:43PM +1200, mdew wrote:
looks like 2.6.12 does the same sort of thing..
As a data-point, my dual HPT374 controllers are fine with
2.6.13-rc3-mm1. One onboard, one in a pci-slot in an Epox 4PCA3+ (socket
478, i875 chipset) motherboard.
Linux adsl-gate
On Gwe, 2005-07-22 at 22:47 -0400, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
Hi,
Does vanilla kernel 2.6.12 work for you?
It doesn't contain hpt366 driver update.
Its nothing to do with the driver. Read the trace Bartlomiej
Jul 23 01:30:21 localhost kernel: hdf: dma timeout error: status=0x25
{
On Sad, 2005-07-23 at 14:28 +1200, mdew wrote:
I'm unable to mount an ext2 drive using the hpt370A raid card.
upon mounting the drive, dmesg will spew these errors..I've tried
different cables and drive is fine.
Jul 23 01:30:21 localhost kernel: hdf: dma timeout error: status=0x25
{
Hi,
Does vanilla kernel 2.6.12 work for you?
It doesn't contain hpt366 driver update.
Bartlomiej
On 7/22/05, mdew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm unable to mount an ext2 drive using the hpt370A raid card.
>
> upon mounting the drive, dmesg will spew these errors..I've tried
> different cables
Hi,
Does vanilla kernel 2.6.12 work for you?
It doesn't contain hpt366 driver update.
Bartlomiej
On 7/22/05, mdew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm unable to mount an ext2 drive using the hpt370A raid card.
upon mounting the drive, dmesg will spew these errors..I've tried
different cables and
On Tuesday 03 July 2001 17:22, Gav wrote:
> This kernel refuses to detect my HPT370 chipset. (where my root filesystem
> is, on raid0). It just hangs where the detection usually takes place, so no
> oops and no meaningfull bugreport :/
>
> I have the same options set in my con
This kernel refuses to detect my HPT370 chipset. (where my root filesystem
is, on raid0). It just hangs where the detection usually takes place, so no
oops and no meaningfull bugreport :/
I have the same options set in my config as I always have, I've never had any
problem with this before
This kernel refuses to detect my HPT370 chipset. (where my root filesystem
is, on raid0). It just hangs where the detection usually takes place, so no
oops and no meaningfull bugreport :/
I have the same options set in my config as I always have, I've never had any
problem with this before
On Tuesday 03 July 2001 17:22, Gav wrote:
This kernel refuses to detect my HPT370 chipset. (where my root filesystem
is, on raid0). It just hangs where the detection usually takes place, so no
oops and no meaningfull bugreport :/
I have the same options set in my config as I always have
At the Partition Check stage, I start getting "hde: lost interrupt"
messages. /dev/hde is an IBM DTLA-307030, sitting on an HPT370
controller (motherboard is KA7-100). Eventually the partitions appear
in the list, interspersed with these lost interrupt messages, but v
At the Partition Check stage, I start getting hde: lost interrupt
messages. /dev/hde is an IBM DTLA-307030, sitting on an HPT370
controller (motherboard is KA7-100). Eventually the partitions appear
in the list, interspersed with these lost interrupt messages, but very
slowly
People,
I have an IWill IDE Raid card with the Highpoint HPT370 Chip. I am
running this on a Dual Processor board (800MHz PIIIs) with a Mandrake
8.0 Disrtibution (2.4.3 Kernel). 200MB of RAM and all slots filled with
lots of cards. I was glad to see that Linux auto-detected the IDE/Raid card
People,
I have an IWill IDE Raid card with the Highpoint HPT370 Chip. I am
running this on a Dual Processor board (800MHz PIIIs) with a Mandrake
8.0 Disrtibution (2.4.3 Kernel). 200MB of RAM and all slots filled with
lots of cards. I was glad to see that Linux auto-detected the IDE/Raid card
+ p += sprintf(p, "\nController: %d\n", i);
+ p += sprintf(p, "Chipset: HPT%s\n", chipset_nums[class_rev]);
+ p += sprintf(p, "Bus speed: %d MHz\n", dev->bus->bus_speed);
^^^
DNE --
+ p += sprintf(p, \nController: %d\n, i);
+ p += sprintf(p, Chipset: HPT%s\n, chipset_nums[class_rev]);
+ p += sprintf(p, Bus speed: %d MHz\n, dev-bus-bus_speed);
^^^
DNE -- Does Not
/hpt366.c Sat May 19 17:43:06 2001
+++ cobalt-2.4.5/drivers/ide/hpt366.c Thu May 31 14:32:15 2001
@@ -11,6 +11,17 @@
*
* Note that final HPT370 support was done by force extraction of GPL.
*
+ * add function for getting/setting power status of drive
+ * Adrian Sun <[EMAIL PROTEC
Andre,
Attached is a patch for hpt366.c for the following:
better support for multiple controllers
better /proc output
66 MHz PCI timings
implement the HDIO_GET/SET_BUSSTATE ioctls (see previous patch)
This patch does rely on the PCI busspeed patch (sent to lkml
Andre,
Attached is a patch for hpt366.c for the following:
better support for multiple controllers
better /proc output
66 MHz PCI timings
implement the HDIO_GET/SET_BUSSTATE ioctls (see previous patch)
This patch does rely on the PCI busspeed patch (sent to lkml
/hpt366.c Sat May 19 17:43:06 2001
+++ cobalt-2.4.5/drivers/ide/hpt366.c Thu May 31 14:32:15 2001
@@ -11,6 +11,17 @@
*
* Note that final HPT370 support was done by force extraction of GPL.
*
+ * add function for getting/setting power status of drive
+ * Adrian Sun [EMAIL PROTECTED
I have been happily accumulating some files on an 80GB Maxtor HD sitting on
/dev/hdg mounted as /arc. There are 2 other drives on the HPT370 (KA7-100
MB with TY Bios) and 2 on the main mother board IDE controller. The system
is currently running 2.4.3-ac14. It has been solid as a rock and I
I have been happily accumulating some files on an 80GB Maxtor HD sitting on
/dev/hdg mounted as /arc. There are 2 other drives on the HPT370 (KA7-100
MB with TY Bios) and 2 on the main mother board IDE controller. The system
is currently running 2.4.3-ac14. It has been solid as a rock and I
> I got these messages in 2.4.4-ac5, and now in 2.4.4-ac6, when I expire
> my news-spool. In 2.4.4, there's no problem expring my newsspool and
> running 2 bonnie's in the background.
Yep. I think there are problems with the hpt366 changes. Im trying to get
more data first.
> BOFH excuse #24:
>
ide1: BM-DMA at 0xc008-0xc00f, BIOS settings: hdc:pio, hdd:pio
HPT370: IDE controller on PCI bus 00 dev 70
HPT370: chipset revision 3
HPT370: not 100% native mode: will probe irqs later
ide2: BM-DMA at 0xec00-0xec07, BIOS settings: hde:DMA, hdf:pio
ide3: BM-DMA at 0xec08-0xec0f, BIOS
ide1: BM-DMA at 0xc008-0xc00f, BIOS settings: hdc:pio, hdd:pio
HPT370: IDE controller on PCI bus 00 dev 70
HPT370: chipset revision 3
HPT370: not 100% native mode: will probe irqs later
ide2: BM-DMA at 0xec00-0xec07, BIOS settings: hde:DMA, hdf:pio
ide3: BM-DMA at 0xec08-0xec0f, BIOS
I got these messages in 2.4.4-ac5, and now in 2.4.4-ac6, when I expire
my news-spool. In 2.4.4, there's no problem expring my newsspool and
running 2 bonnie's in the background.
Yep. I think there are problems with the hpt366 changes. Im trying to get
more data first.
BOFH excuse #24:
COOL...
We can take a look and see.
On Mon, 7 May 2001, Wilfried Weissmann wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I just put my highpoint-tech raid hack on a website:
> http://www.rug-rats.org/~wilfried/
> So if you want to play around with it you can download it from there +
> get a mininum of
COOL...
We can take a look and see.
On Mon, 7 May 2001, Wilfried Weissmann wrote:
Hi!
I just put my highpoint-tech raid hack on a website:
http://www.rug-rats.org/~wilfried/
So if you want to play around with it you can download it from there +
get a mininum of
Hi!
I just put my highpoint-tech raid hack on a website:
http://www.rug-rats.org/~wilfried/
So if you want to play around with it you can download it from there +
get a mininum of documentation.
Andre Hedric, Ajran van de Ven, ...:
I am sorry that I did not had much time lately to get some
Hi!
I just put my highpoint-tech raid hack on a website:
http://www.rug-rats.org/~wilfried/
So if you want to play around with it you can download it from there +
get a mininum of documentation.
Andre Hedric, Ajran van de Ven, ...:
I am sorry that I did not had much time lately to get some
On Sat, May 05, 2001 at 02:37:53PM -0400, Ed Tomlinson wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >> 2.4.4-ac5
> >> o Fix DMA setup on hpt366/370 (Tim Hockin)
> >
> > I see definite changes; on heavy disk-access I got the following:
> >
> > hdg: timeout waiting for dma
> >
On Sat, May 05, 2001 at 02:37:53PM -0400, Ed Tomlinson wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2.4.4-ac5
o Fix DMA setup on hpt366/370 (Tim Hockin)
I see definite changes; on heavy disk-access I got the following:
hdg: timeout waiting for dma
ide_dmaproc: chipset
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Fri, May 04, 2001 at 11:24:58PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
>>
>> ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/alan/2.4/
>>
>> Intermediate diffs are available from
>>
>> http://www.bzimage.org
>>
>> Please test this code **carefully** if using an HPT366/370 IDE
s=xx
VP_IDE: VIA vt82c686b (rev 40) IDE UDMA100 controller on pci00:07.1
ide0: BM-DMA at 0xc000-0xc007, BIOS settings: hda:DMA, hdb:pio
ide1: BM-DMA at 0xc008-0xc00f, BIOS settings: hdc:pio, hdd:pio
HPT370: IDE controller on PCI bus 00 dev 70
HPT370: chipset revision 3
HPT370: not 100% native m
controller on pci00:07.1
ide0: BM-DMA at 0xc000-0xc007, BIOS settings: hda:DMA, hdb:pio
ide1: BM-DMA at 0xc008-0xc00f, BIOS settings: hdc:pio, hdd:pio
HPT370: IDE controller on PCI bus 00 dev 70
HPT370: chipset revision 3
HPT370: not 100% native mode: will probe irqs later
ide2: BM-DMA at 0xec00
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, May 04, 2001 at 11:24:58PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/alan/2.4/
Intermediate diffs are available from
http://www.bzimage.org
Please test this code **carefully** if using an HPT366/370 IDE controller as
there
Jeroen Geusebroek wrote:
> I have ordered a ABIT VP6 motherboard with the HPT370 controller
> and would like to know if raid0 is supported with linux?
>
> If not, will i be able to work without raid then? (maybe using
> software raid)
The controller is working fine, but the rai
Quoth "Jeroen Geusebroek":
> If not, will i be able to work without raid then? (maybe using
> software raid)
http://www.linux-ide.org/chipsets.html
Yours is listed under "supported, but not for RAID", which probably
means it works well when accessing individual disks, which again should
mean
Hi guys,
I have ordered a ABIT VP6 motherboard with the HPT370 controller
and would like to know if raid0 is supported with linux?
If not, will i be able to work without raid then? (maybe using
software raid)
Thanks,
Jeroen Geusebroek
P.s. Please CC me in your reply, since i'm not subscribed
Hi guys,
I have ordered a ABIT VP6 motherboard with the HPT370 controller
and would like to know if raid0 is supported with linux?
If not, will i be able to work without raid then? (maybe using
software raid)
Thanks,
Jeroen Geusebroek
P.s. Please CC me in your reply, since i'm not subscribed
Quoth Jeroen Geusebroek:
If not, will i be able to work without raid then? (maybe using
software raid)
http://www.linux-ide.org/chipsets.html
Yours is listed under supported, but not for RAID, which probably
means it works well when accessing individual disks, which again should
mean it
Jeroen Geusebroek wrote:
I have ordered a ABIT VP6 motherboard with the HPT370 controller
and would like to know if raid0 is supported with linux?
If not, will i be able to work without raid then? (maybe using
software raid)
The controller is working fine, but the raid functionality
> do know I get the feeling they don't care to support Linux in any way
> shape or form. Feels like a pawn off job.
afaik, there's no hardware raid support in the chip - it's just
another dual-channel controller, with some raid0 (perhaps raid1)
software in bios. I think Andre has said that he
On Thu, 15 Feb 2001, Bradley Kite wrote:
> I found this message while searching for a solution to getting
> linux to see a raid array on my HPT370:
>
> http://www.mailgate.org/linux/linux.dev.raid/msg00163.html
>
> Its got someone from highpoint saying that raid support
I'm new to this list so I'd like to say hi first :-)
I found this message while searching for a solution to getting
linux to see a raid array on my HPT370:
http://www.mailgate.org/linux/linux.dev.raid/msg00163.html
Its got someone from highpoint saying that raid support will
be offered
I'm new to this list so I'd like to say hi first :-)
I found this message while searching for a solution to getting
linux to see a raid array on my HPT370:
http://www.mailgate.org/linux/linux.dev.raid/msg00163.html
Its got someone from highpoint saying that raid support will
be offered
On Thu, 15 Feb 2001, Bradley Kite wrote:
I found this message while searching for a solution to getting
linux to see a raid array on my HPT370:
http://www.mailgate.org/linux/linux.dev.raid/msg00163.html
Its got someone from highpoint saying that raid support will
be offered "in the
do know I get the feeling they don't care to support Linux in any way
shape or form. Feels like a pawn off job.
afaik, there's no hardware raid support in the chip - it's just
another dual-channel controller, with some raid0 (perhaps raid1)
software in bios. I think Andre has said that he
Booted fine on a box I installed 2.4.1 on..
On Tuesday, 06 February 2001, at 02:38:29 (+0100),
Vladimir Kukuruzovic wrote:
> Hi,
> Maybe you don't know, but current Linux kernel (starting somewhere in
> testNN, probably test10 series) won't boot with HPT370 controller. With
> c
Hi,
Maybe you don't know, but current Linux kernel (starting somewhere in
testNN, probably test10 series) won't boot with HPT370 controller. With
current setup (only one disk on that controller, no raid, no fancy stuff)
the kernel locks after writing ide2: line :( Well, it used to work earlier
Hi,
Maybe you don't know, but current Linux kernel (starting somewhere in
testNN, probably test10 series) won't boot with HPT370 controller. With
current setup (only one disk on that controller, no raid, no fancy stuff)
the kernel locks after writing ide2: line :( Well, it used to work earlier
Booted fine on a box I installed 2.4.1 on..
On Tuesday, 06 February 2001, at 02:38:29 (+0100),
Vladimir Kukuruzovic wrote:
Hi,
Maybe you don't know, but current Linux kernel (starting somewhere in
testNN, probably test10 series) won't boot with HPT370 controller. With
current setup (only
I have email Soren a few days ago and asked him about how he did the
decoding of the RAID Signatures on the media and he has not replied.
Soren and I talk on a semi-quarterly basis to brag and boast/gloat.
For the record I have the information on the array content, and the raid
engin design,
I've read everything that I can find regarding support of the Highpoint
controllers RAID functionality under Linux, and I understand what the issues
have been. The one promising bit of information that I dug up in this process is
that the 'pseudo' RAID functionality of the Highpoint and Promise
I've read everything that I can find regarding support of the Highpoint
controllers RAID functionality under Linux, and I understand what the issues
have been. The one promising bit of information that I dug up in this process is
that the 'pseudo' RAID functionality of the Highpoint and Promise
I have email Soren a few days ago and asked him about how he did the
decoding of the RAID Signatures on the media and he has not replied.
Soren and I talk on a semi-quarterly basis to brag and boast/gloat.
For the record I have the information on the array content, and the raid
engin design,
I've read everything that I can find regarding support of the Highpoint
controllers RAID functionality under Linux, and I understand what the issues
have been. The one promising bit of information that I dug up in this process is
that the 'pseudo' RAID functionality of the Highpoint and Promise
I've read everything that I can find regarding support of the Highpoint
controllers RAID functionality under Linux, and I understand what the issues
have been. The one promising bit of information that I dug up in this process is
that the 'pseudo' RAID functionality of the Highpoint and Promise
I have an Abit KT7-RAID mobo which sports an HPT370 ATA-100 IDE
controller. When I configure support for the 370 into a 2.4.0-test12
kernel, the resulting kernel will hang at boot time. The ide2 and ide3
channels are detected, but when the kernel gets to the part where it
usually displays info
I have an Abit KT7-RAID mobo which sports an HPT370 ATA-100 IDE
controller. When I configure support for the 370 into a 2.4.0-test12
kernel, the resulting kernel will hang at boot time. The ide2 and ide3
channels are detected, but when the kernel gets to the part where it
usually displays info
ence or not.
>
> I have a standalone card with the HPT370 chipset doing RAID fine.
> Or at least did until one of the drives died within an hour of using it.
> This was drive failure, not the card though. Whilst it was working,
> it seemed to be working fine. :)
>
> > Also, OT, does
with the HPT370 chipset doing RAID fine.
Or at least did until one of the drives died within an hour of using it.
This was drive failure, not the card though. Whilst it was working,
it seemed to be working fine. :)
Also, OT, does anyone know if the controller is managed through hardware
On Mon, 20 Nov 2000, Michael J. Dikkema wrote:
> Does Linux 2.4pre support the raid controller on the abit vp6? The kernel
> says it supports the 370, but it doesn't mention raid. I was confused as
> to if there was a difference or not.
I have a standalone card with the HPT370 chip
HELLO WORLD!
Michael, do not take this as a flame, please. You just happen to jump on
that nerve at the wrong point. ;-)
http://www.linux-ide.org/chipsets.html
Linux ATA Development Project, Supported Chipsets (p1 of 3)
Supported Chipsets and
Does Linux 2.4pre support the raid controller on the abit vp6? The kernel
says it supports the 370, but it doesn't mention raid. I was confused as
to if there was a difference or not.
Also, OT, does anyone know if the controller is managed through hardware
or through software?
Thanks.
,.;::
:
Does Linux 2.4pre support the raid controller on the abit vp6? The kernel
says it supports the 370, but it doesn't mention raid. I was confused as
to if there was a difference or not.
Also, OT, does anyone know if the controller is managed through hardware
or through software?
Thanks.
,.;::
:
HELLO WORLD!
Michael, do not take this as a flame, please. You just happen to jump on
that nerve at the wrong point. ;-)
http://www.linux-ide.org/chipsets.html
Linux ATA Development Project, Supported Chipsets (p1 of 3)
Supported Chipsets and
On Mon, 20 Nov 2000, Michael J. Dikkema wrote:
Does Linux 2.4pre support the raid controller on the abit vp6? The kernel
says it supports the 370, but it doesn't mention raid. I was confused as
to if there was a difference or not.
I have a standalone card with the HPT370 chipset doing RAID
Resubmitting this bug as it happens both on -test10 and, I just
verified, -test11-pre1.
(using the bug report form. if you wish to contact me, please
do so off-list as I am not subscribed.)
1. Locks up on boot with HPT370
2. Using kernel 2.4.0-test10, my machine gets to the part
Resubmitting this bug as it happens both on -test10 and, I just
verified, -test11-pre1.
(using the bug report form. if you wish to contact me, please
do so off-list as I am not subscribed.)
1. Locks up on boot with HPT370
2. Using kernel 2.4.0-test10, my machine gets to the part
Hi Rob,
Not to worry I will make a permanent fix to require Chipset code for
funtionallity; therefore, the confusion of modes will be completely
removed.
Regards,
Andre Hedrick
CTO Timpanogas Research Group
EVP Linux Development, TRG
Linux ATA Development
-
To unsubscribe from this list:
Hello,
I wrote about a week or so ago about switching DMA modes on the HPT370
controller.
I've been fiddling and have found something odd.
If I compile a kernel without the 'HPT370' option in the IDE/ATA config,
the machine starts okay, and after turning DMA on, the drive fetches about
21.5MB
Hi Rob,
Not to worry I will make a permanent fix to require Chipset code for
funtionallity; therefore, the confusion of modes will be completely
removed.
Regards,
Andre Hedrick
CTO Timpanogas Research Group
EVP Linux Development, TRG
Linux ATA Development
-
To unsubscribe from this list:
> Hello,
>
> The Highpoint Technologies HPT370 ATA-100 + RAID chip is supported well
> the lastest releases but it's RAID features are not implemented. I've
> heard rumours telling that this chip isn't a real RAID chip possessing
> only minimal (if any) hardware RAID capabilit
Hello,
The Highpoint Technologies HPT370 ATA-100 + RAID chip is supported well
the lastest releases but it's RAID features are not implemented. I've
heard rumours telling that this chip isn't a real RAID chip possessing
only minimal (if any) hardware RAID capabilities and even those
Hello,
The Highpoint Technologies HPT370 ATA-100 + RAID chip is supported well
the lastest releases but it's RAID features are not implemented. I've
heard rumours telling that this chip isn't a real RAID chip possessing
only minimal (if any) hardware RAID capabilities and even those
Hello,
The Highpoint Technologies HPT370 ATA-100 + RAID chip is supported well
the lastest releases but it's RAID features are not implemented. I've
heard rumours telling that this chip isn't a real RAID chip possessing
only minimal (if any) hardware RAID capabilities and even those
(using the bug report form. if you wish to contact me, please
do so off-list as I am not subscribed.)
1. Locks up on boot with HPT370
2. Using kernel 2.4.0-test10, my machine gets to the part of
the bootup where it has detected drives and CD-ROM's on hda,
hdc, hdd. It then locks up
(using the bug report form. if you wish to contact me, please
do so off-list as I am not subscribed.)
1. Locks up on boot with HPT370
2. Using kernel 2.4.0-test10, my machine gets to the part of
the bootup where it has detected drives and CD-ROM's on hda,
hdc, hdd. It then locks up
Hi,
I've got a UDMA66 drive on a HPT370 controller. Whenever I issue a command
to switch to a higher DMA mode ("hdparm -X67" or "-X68") the machine locks
completely - no response to Magic SysRq at all.
The drive starts in udma2 upon bootup (it's a "Nikimi NIK-XL300
Hi,
I've got a UDMA66 drive on a HPT370 controller. Whenever I issue a command
to switch to a higher DMA mode ("hdparm -X67" or "-X68") the machine locks
completely - no response to Magic SysRq at all.
The drive starts in udma2 upon bootup (it's a "Nikimi NIK-XL300
gt; I was just wondering if there was some reason why the HPT370's RAID
> capabilities weren't supported in the enhanced IDE patch for 2.2.*? Or if
> support for its RAID capabilities were being worked on. I noticed FreeBSD
> also appears to fail to support its RAID features so I am
Hi,
I was just wondering if there was some reason why the HPT370's RAID
capabilities weren't supported in the enhanced IDE patch for 2.2.*? Or if
support for its RAID capabilities were being worked on. I noticed FreeBSD
also appears to fail to support its RAID features so I am partially
Hi,
I was wondering if support for the HPT370 RAID capabilities is planned?
I found that with the IDE patch from Hedrick I was able to get regular EIDE
device support for this controller however I was hoping to use its RAID
capabilities. Is work on this being done? Thanks for any help
Hi,
I was wondering if support for the HPT370 RAID capabilities is planned?
I found that with the IDE patch from Hedrick I was able to get regular EIDE
device support for this controller however I was hoping to use its RAID
capabilities. Is work on this being done? Thanks for any help
91 matches
Mail list logo
