Hello.
Alan Cox wrote:
There are many reasons a card would default to a higher level, but in
the end it is basically tuning the card for a server application.
A warning that some cards default to high PCI latency values; settings that
can interfere with latency sensitive devices such as soun
O> I have ran with a setting of 40 for a couple of days without any trouble.
> There are many reasons a card would default to a higher level, but in
> the end it is basically tuning the card for a server application.
>
> A warning that some cards default to high PCI latency values; settings that
On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 18:30:33 +0400
Sergei Shtylyov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Mike Mattie wrote:
>
> > while hunting down some latency problems I found something quite
> > odd. The latency reported by lspci -v for the HTP203N card is
> > enormous.
>
> > 00:09.0 RAID bus controller:
Hello.
Mike Mattie wrote:
while hunting down some latency problems I found something quite odd.
The latency reported by lspci -v for the HTP203N card is enormous.
00:09.0 RAID bus controller: Triones Technologies, Inc. HPT302/302N
(rev 02) Subsystem: Triones Technologies, Inc. Unknown device
Hello,
while hunting down some latency problems I found something quite odd.
The latency reported by lspci -v for the HTP203N card is enormous.
00:09.0 RAID bus controller: Triones Technologies, Inc. HPT302/302N
(rev 02) Subsystem: Triones Technologies, Inc. Unknown device 0001
Flags: bus
5 matches
Mail list logo