Re: i2c: slave support framework for Linux devices

2016-07-22 Thread Wolfram Sang
On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 01:55:52PM +0300, Kachalov Anton wrote: > Wolfram, > > I would like to include you in the discussion loop while you are main author > of the I2C slave framework. You should rather resend the message to the linux-i2c list. signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: i2c: slave support framework for Linux devices

2016-07-22 Thread Kachalov Anton
Wolfram, I would like to include you in the discussion loop while you are main author of the I2C slave framework. Uwe, you've involved in discussion of i2c framework in 2014. It would be great if you mind to share some thoughts of the further improvements. 21.07.2016, 00:51, "Kachalov Anton"

i2c: slave support framework for Linux devices

2016-07-20 Thread Kachalov Anton
Hello. I'm working on multi-master i2c support in Aspeed SoC (AST2150, AST2300 and so on) and succeed with event passing to the slave software backend. Besides AST has two operation modes: byte transfer and buffer transfer. While i2c slave framework operates over bytes. In current scheme I woul

Re: [PATCH 0/3] i2c: slave support framework for Linux devices

2014-12-11 Thread Wolfram Sang
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 05:04:52PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote: > Finally, here is my take on the often desired feature that Linux can not only > be an I2C master, but also an I2C slave. Since RFC, most open issues have been > dealt with. Find details in the patch descriptions. Documentation is still

[PATCH 0/3] i2c: slave support framework for Linux devices

2014-11-18 Thread Wolfram Sang
Finally, here is my take on the often desired feature that Linux can not only be an I2C master, but also an I2C slave. Since RFC, most open issues have been dealt with. Find details in the patch descriptions. Documentation is still missing and will come later this or next week, but surely early eno

Re: [RFC 0/4] i2c: slave support framework for Linux devices

2014-09-12 Thread Wolfram Sang
> - If I understand correctly you cannot register an i2c slave without > also registering a master, right? I don't think this is troubling in > practice, is it? > For abstraction I would prefer to make these different concepts > though. You need to register an adapter, yes. It does not ne

Re: [RFC 0/4] i2c: slave support framework for Linux devices

2014-09-12 Thread Uwe Kleine-König
Hello Wolfram, On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 04:54:26PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote: > Finally, here is my take on the often desired feature that Linux can not only > be an I2C master, but also an I2C slave. Compared to my draft sent out last > week, this RFC has been tested on hardware (Renesas Lager boa

Re: [RFC 0/4] i2c: slave support framework for Linux devices

2014-09-11 Thread Marc Dietrich
Hello Wolfram, Am Dienstag, 9. September 2014, 16:54:26 schrieb Wolfram Sang: > Finally, here is my take on the often desired feature that Linux can not > only be an I2C master, but also an I2C slave. Compared to my draft sent out > last week, this RFC has been tested on hardware (Renesas Lager bo

[RFC 0/4] i2c: slave support framework for Linux devices

2014-09-09 Thread Wolfram Sang
Finally, here is my take on the often desired feature that Linux can not only be an I2C master, but also an I2C slave. Compared to my draft sent out last week, this RFC has been tested on hardware (Renesas Lager board) and works \o/ One big part still missing is documentation, so brave ones need t