On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 11:21:31PM +0100, Frédéric Riss wrote:
> Le lundi 29 janvier 2007 à 23:10 +0100, Pavel Machek a écrit :
> > > > Ok, I guess we'd like some testing here... so that in can be fixed in
> > > > mainline...
> > >
> > > I can confirm that this patch is needed for my Intel Ma
Le lundi 29 janvier 2007 à 23:10 +0100, Pavel Machek a écrit :
> > > Ok, I guess we'd like some testing here... so that in can be fixed in
> > > mainline...
> >
> > I can confirm that this patch is needed for my Intel Mac Mini to resume
> > correctly when used without BIOS emulation (EFI mode). He
Hi!
> > Ok, I guess we'd like some testing here... so that in can be fixed in
> > mainline...
>
> I can confirm that this patch is needed for my Intel Mac Mini to resume
> correctly when used without BIOS emulation (EFI mode). Here're the
> relevant lspci lines:
Can you attach the patch you test
Le mardi 23 janvier 2007 à 09:44 +, Pavel Machek a écrit :
> Hi!
>
> > > > Whitelist? Let me blacklist it all the way to Timbuktu instead!
> > >
> > > > I've been doing more testing, and X never managed to come back to
> > > > working
> > > > state without some of my couple intel-agp changes
On 1/23/07, Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've post a patch which trys to resolve pci config restore issue, see
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/1/16/297. It resolves s3 issue with my 965G machine,
> that my X can come back to live after s3, but I wasn't aware of the issues
Andreas
> has
Hi!
> > > Whitelist? Let me blacklist it all the way to Timbuktu instead!
> >
> > > I've been doing more testing, and X never managed to come back to working
> > > state without some of my couple intel-agp changes:
> > > - a proper suspend method, doing a proper pci_save_state()
> > > or improv
6 matches
Mail list logo
