On Fri, Aug 31, 2007 at 03:55:53AM +, Dan Stromberg wrote:
> Is anyone on the list familiar with ifconfig up and/or ip link up
> changing a routing table? How does the kernel decide what route to add
> in such a circumstance?
By the parameteres you supplied for the interface configuration.
From: Dan Stromberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 03:55:53 + (UTC)
> I'm not accustomed to ifconfig changing the routing table. Is this
> normal?
Every time you enable an IP address on an interface, the
kernel creates a route to that subnet which gets likewise
deleted when you
If I "ifconfig eth1 down", a rogue route disappears.
If I "ifconfig eth1 up" or "ip link set dev eth1 up", the rogue route
comes back.
The route in question is for 10.3/16, and it's breaking some of my
communications that should be handled by my default route.
I'm not accustomed to ifconfig c
3 matches
Mail list logo
