H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> I suggested include/kernel and include/arch with include/linux and
> include/asm being reserved for the kernel interfaces (ioctl and their
> structures mostly.)
That sounds good. One other refinement I would like to see is that
architecture specific but always present
On Wed, Nov 22, 2000 at 02:35:43PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Followup to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> By author:"LA Walsh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
> >
> > Linus has mentioned a desire to move kernel internal interfaces into
> > a separate kernel include directory.
Followup to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
By author:"LA Walsh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
>
> Linus has mentioned a desire to move kernel internal interfaces into
> a separate kernel include directory. In creating some code, I'm wondering
> what the name of this should/will
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> Linus has mentioned a desire to move kernel internal interfaces into
> a separate kernel include directory. In creating some code, I'm wondering
> what the name of this should/will be. Does it follow that convention
> would point toward a linux/sys
Linus has mentioned a desire to move kernel internal interfaces into
a separate kernel include directory. In creating some code, I'm wondering
what the name of this should/will be. Does it follow that convention
would point toward a linux/sys directory?
-l
--
L A Walsh|
Linus has mentioned a desire to move kernel internal interfaces into
a separate kernel include directory. In creating some code, I'm wondering
what the name of this should/will be. Does it follow that convention
would point toward a linux/sys directory?
-l
--
L A Walsh|
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
Linus has mentioned a desire to move kernel internal interfaces into
a separate kernel include directory. In creating some code, I'm wondering
what the name of this should/will be. Does it follow that convention
would point toward a linux/sys
Followup to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
By author:"LA Walsh" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
Linus has mentioned a desire to move kernel internal interfaces into
a separate kernel include directory. In creating some code, I'm wondering
what the name of this should/will be. Does
On Wed, Nov 22, 2000 at 02:35:43PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
Followup to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
By author:"LA Walsh" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
Linus has mentioned a desire to move kernel internal interfaces into
a separate kernel include directory. In creating
H. Peter Anvin wrote:
I suggested include/kernel and include/arch with include/linux and
include/asm being reserved for the kernel interfaces (ioctl and their
structures mostly.)
That sounds good. One other refinement I would like to see is that
architecture specific but always present
10 matches
Mail list logo
