On 7/2/07, Robert P. J. Day <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
consider this random Kconfig file arch/x86_64/oprofile/Kconfig:
=
config PROFILING
bool "Profiling support (EXPERIMENTAL)"
help
Say Y here to enable the extended profiling support mechani
On Mon, 2 Jul 2007, Abhishek Sagar wrote:
> On 7/2/07, Robert P. J. Day <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2 Jul 2007, Abhishek Sagar wrote:
> >
> > > On 7/1/07, Robert P. J. Day <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > isn't kprobes mature enough to not be considered experimental anymore?
> > >
> >
On 7/2/07, Robert P. J. Day <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, 2 Jul 2007, Abhishek Sagar wrote:
> On 7/1/07, Robert P. J. Day <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > isn't kprobes mature enough to not be considered experimental anymore?
>
> That would vary from arch to arch.
fair enough. however, at t
On Mon, 2 Jul 2007, Abhishek Sagar wrote:
> On 7/1/07, Robert P. J. Day <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > isn't kprobes mature enough to not be considered experimental anymore?
>
> That would vary from arch to arch.
fair enough. however, at the very least, i'm thinking that the entire
"Instrumentat
On 7/1/07, Robert P. J. Day <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
isn't kprobes mature enough to not be considered experimental anymore?
That would vary from arch to arch.
in addition, while most of the KPROBES config options depend on
KALLSYMS && EXPERIMENTAL && MODULES
the s390 architecture depe
i just noticed that, in the Kconfig files that support KPROBES, both
the "Instrumentation support" menu is still listed as EXPERIMENTAL,
while Kprobes support within is simultaneously dependent on that same
selection.
for one, that's kind of redundant and, for another, isn't kprobes
mature en
6 matches
Mail list logo
