On Sat, Feb 24, 2007 at 10:59:42AM -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> On Sat, 24 Feb 2007, Oleg Verych wrote:
>
> > > From: "Robert P. J. Day"
> > > Newsgroups: gmane.linux.kernel
> > > Subject: [PATCH][RFC] Make asm-generic/ioctl.h extensible by adding
> > > conditionals.
> > > Date: Sat, 24 Feb
On Sat, 24 Feb 2007, Oleg Verych wrote:
> > From: "Robert P. J. Day"
> > Newsgroups: gmane.linux.kernel
> > Subject: [PATCH][RFC] Make asm-generic/ioctl.h extensible by adding
> > conditionals.
> > Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2007 06:45:20 -0500 (EST)
>
> > as a followup to my earlier post, is it worth
> From: "Robert P. J. Day"
> Newsgroups: gmane.linux.kernel
> Subject: [PATCH][RFC] Make asm-generic/ioctl.h extensible by adding
> conditionals.
> Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2007 06:45:20 -0500 (EST)
> as a followup to my earlier post, is it worth making this change to
> allow at least a couple
From: Robert P. J. Day
Newsgroups: gmane.linux.kernel
Subject: [PATCH][RFC] Make asm-generic/ioctl.h extensible by adding
conditionals.
Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2007 06:45:20 -0500 (EST)
as a followup to my earlier post, is it worth making this change to
allow at least a couple arch-specific
On Sat, 24 Feb 2007, Oleg Verych wrote:
From: Robert P. J. Day
Newsgroups: gmane.linux.kernel
Subject: [PATCH][RFC] Make asm-generic/ioctl.h extensible by adding
conditionals.
Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2007 06:45:20 -0500 (EST)
as a followup to my earlier post, is it worth making this
On Sat, Feb 24, 2007 at 10:59:42AM -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
On Sat, 24 Feb 2007, Oleg Verych wrote:
From: Robert P. J. Day
Newsgroups: gmane.linux.kernel
Subject: [PATCH][RFC] Make asm-generic/ioctl.h extensible by adding
conditionals.
Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2007 06:45:20 -0500
6 matches
Mail list logo
