On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 02:28:53PM -0400, Peter Hurley wrote:
> > bad news: Turns out my recent testing where I thought your patches fixed
> > this was incorrect. I had excluded fuzz testing of msgrcv, so it was never
> > getting exercised.
>
> I think you might have applied the wrong seri
On Mon, 2013-03-25 at 12:37 -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 03:03:22PM -0400, Peter Hurley wrote:
> > On Mon, 2013-03-11 at 14:26 -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> > > On Fri, Mar 08, 2013 at 07:27:01PM -0500, Peter Hurley wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Thu, 2013-03-07 at 16:38 -0500, D
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 03:03:22PM -0400, Peter Hurley wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-03-11 at 14:26 -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 08, 2013 at 07:27:01PM -0500, Peter Hurley wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, 2013-03-07 at 16:38 -0500, Dave Jones wrote:
> > >
> > > > general protection fault: 0
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 03:02:36PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Mar 2013 15:03:22 -0400 Peter Hurley
> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 2013-03-11 at 14:26 -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> > > > > {
> > >
> > > I just hit this again on rc2 which looks like it has the fixes that
> > >
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 03:02:36PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Mar 2013 15:03:22 -0400 Peter Hurley
> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 2013-03-11 at 14:26 -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> > > > > {
> > >
> > > I just hit this again on rc2 which looks like it has the fixes that
> > >
On Mon, 11 Mar 2013 15:03:22 -0400 Peter Hurley
wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-03-11 at 14:26 -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> > > > {
> >
> > I just hit this again on rc2 which looks like it has the fixes that
> > Peter mentions above. This time rdi was 6b6b6b6b6b6b6b7b
> >
> > Dave
>
> Sorry
On Mon, 2013-03-11 at 14:26 -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 08, 2013 at 07:27:01PM -0500, Peter Hurley wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 2013-03-07 at 16:38 -0500, Dave Jones wrote:
> > Dave,
> > I thought I copied you on the 'ipc MSG_COPY fixes' patchset that fixes
> > this. Or is this gp fault ha
On Fri, Mar 08, 2013 at 07:27:01PM -0500, Peter Hurley wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-03-07 at 16:38 -0500, Dave Jones wrote:
> Dave,
> I thought I copied you on the 'ipc MSG_COPY fixes' patchset that fixes
> this. Or is this gp fault happening with that patchset?
>
> Linus,
> The fixes should be
On Fri, Mar 08, 2013 at 07:27:01PM -0500, Peter Hurley wrote:
> [ +Andrew Morton ]
>
> On Thu, 2013-03-07 at 16:38 -0500, Dave Jones wrote:
> > Trying to reproduce that nd_jump_link trace, but I keep hitting other bugs
> > instead. It's like whackamole. Except these are even more annoying
>
[ +Andrew Morton ]
On Thu, 2013-03-07 at 16:38 -0500, Dave Jones wrote:
> Trying to reproduce that nd_jump_link trace, but I keep hitting other bugs
> instead. It's like whackamole. Except these are even more annoying
> than moles.
Dave,
I thought I copied you on the 'ipc MSG_COPY fixes' patchse
On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 01:45:27PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Adding Davem to the list, since this looks like networking.
>
> That said, I'm also starting to wonder if you're just triggering odd
> bugs because of some use-after-free corruption of random kernel data
> structures?
Plausibl
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 1:49 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Linus Torvalds
> Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2013 13:45:27 -0800
>
>> Adding Davem to the list, since this looks like networking.
>
> I'd like to help but this looks more like sysv IPC than
> networking. :-)
Yeah, I'm a f*cking moron.
msgrcv vs r
From: Linus Torvalds
Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2013 13:45:27 -0800
> Adding Davem to the list, since this looks like networking.
I'd like to help but this looks more like sysv IPC than
networking. :-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to m
Adding Davem to the list, since this looks like networking.
That said, I'm also starting to wonder if you're just triggering odd
bugs because of some use-after-free corruption of random kernel data
structures? I seem to have a dim memory of you usually doing your
trinity runs with more debugging o
Trying to reproduce that nd_jump_link trace, but I keep hitting other bugs
instead. It's like whackamole. Except these are even more annoying
than moles.
general protection fault: [#1] PREEMPT SMP
Modules linked in: rose ax25 phonet lockd sunrpc ip6t_REJECT nf_conntrack_ipv6
nf_defrag_ipv
15 matches
Mail list logo
