Re: java/old_mmap allocation problems...

2001-05-18 Thread Aaron Denney
On Fri, 18 May 2001 08:33:05 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > i'm having problems to convince java (1.3.1) to allocate more > than 1.9gb of memory on 2.4.2-ac2 (SMP/6gb phys mem) or more > than 1.1gb on 2.2.18 (SMP/2gb phys mem)... > > modifing /proc/sys/vm parameters

Re: java/old_mmap allocation problems...

2001-05-18 Thread Wayne Whitney
In mailing-lists.linux-kernel, you wrote: >i'm having problems to convince java (1.3.1) to allocate more >than 1.9gb of memory on 2.4.2-ac2 (SMP/6gb phys mem) or more >than 1.1gb on 2.2.18 (SMP/2gb phys mem)... Take a look at a thread from January starting at this point:

Re: java/old_mmap allocation problems...

2001-05-18 Thread Wayne Whitney
In mailing-lists.linux-kernel, you wrote: i'm having problems to convince java (1.3.1) to allocate more than 1.9gb of memory on 2.4.2-ac2 (SMP/6gb phys mem) or more than 1.1gb on 2.2.18 (SMP/2gb phys mem)... Take a look at a thread from January starting at this point:

Re: java/old_mmap allocation problems...

2001-05-18 Thread Aaron Denney
On Fri, 18 May 2001 08:33:05 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: i'm having problems to convince java (1.3.1) to allocate more than 1.9gb of memory on 2.4.2-ac2 (SMP/6gb phys mem) or more than 1.1gb on 2.2.18 (SMP/2gb phys mem)... modifing /proc/sys/vm parameters didn't help

java/old_mmap allocation problems...

2001-05-17 Thread firenza
hi, i'm having problems to convince java (1.3.1) to allocate more than 1.9gb of memory on 2.4.2-ac2 (SMP/6gb phys mem) or more than 1.1gb on 2.2.18 (SMP/2gb phys mem)... modifing /proc/sys/vm parameters didn't help either... the fact that i can allocate more memory under 2.4 than under 2.2

java/old_mmap allocation problems...

2001-05-17 Thread firenza
hi, i'm having problems to convince java (1.3.1) to allocate more than 1.9gb of memory on 2.4.2-ac2 (SMP/6gb phys mem) or more than 1.1gb on 2.2.18 (SMP/2gb phys mem)... modifing /proc/sys/vm parameters didn't help either... the fact that i can allocate more memory under 2.4 than under 2.2