4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
[ Upstream commit a788c5272769ddbcdbab297cf386413eeac04463 ]
jffs2_sync_fs makes the assumption that if CONFIG_JFFS2_FS_WRITEBUFFER
is defined then a write buffer is available and has been initialized
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
[ Upstream commit a788c5272769ddbcdbab297cf386413eeac04463 ]
jffs2_sync_fs makes the assumption that if CONFIG_JFFS2_FS_WRITEBUFFER
is defined then a write buffer is available and has been initialized.
4.19-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
[ Upstream commit a788c5272769ddbcdbab297cf386413eeac04463 ]
jffs2_sync_fs makes the assumption that if CONFIG_JFFS2_FS_WRITEBUFFER
is defined then a write buffer is available and has been initialized
4.20-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
[ Upstream commit a788c5272769ddbcdbab297cf386413eeac04463 ]
jffs2_sync_fs makes the assumption that if CONFIG_JFFS2_FS_WRITEBUFFER
is defined then a write buffer is available and has been initialized
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
[ Upstream commit a788c5272769ddbcdbab297cf386413eeac04463 ]
jffs2_sync_fs makes the assumption that if CONFIG_JFFS2_FS_WRITEBUFFER
is defined then a write buffer is available and has been initialized.
3.18-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
[ Upstream commit a788c5272769ddbcdbab297cf386413eeac04463 ]
jffs2_sync_fs makes the assumption that if CONFIG_JFFS2_FS_WRITEBUFFER
is defined then a write buffer is available and has been initialized
From: Daniel Santos
[ Upstream commit a788c5272769ddbcdbab297cf386413eeac04463 ]
jffs2_sync_fs makes the assumption that if CONFIG_JFFS2_FS_WRITEBUFFER
is defined then a write buffer is available and has been initialized.
However, this does is not the case when the mtd device has no
out-of-band
From: Daniel Santos
[ Upstream commit a788c5272769ddbcdbab297cf386413eeac04463 ]
jffs2_sync_fs makes the assumption that if CONFIG_JFFS2_FS_WRITEBUFFER
is defined then a write buffer is available and has been initialized.
However, this does is not the case when the mtd device has no
out-of-band
From: Daniel Santos
[ Upstream commit a788c5272769ddbcdbab297cf386413eeac04463 ]
jffs2_sync_fs makes the assumption that if CONFIG_JFFS2_FS_WRITEBUFFER
is defined then a write buffer is available and has been initialized.
However, this does is not the case when the mtd device has no
out-of-band
From: Daniel Santos
[ Upstream commit a788c5272769ddbcdbab297cf386413eeac04463 ]
jffs2_sync_fs makes the assumption that if CONFIG_JFFS2_FS_WRITEBUFFER
is defined then a write buffer is available and has been initialized.
However, this does is not the case when the mtd device has no
out-of-band
From: Daniel Santos
[ Upstream commit a788c5272769ddbcdbab297cf386413eeac04463 ]
jffs2_sync_fs makes the assumption that if CONFIG_JFFS2_FS_WRITEBUFFER
is defined then a write buffer is available and has been initialized.
However, this does is not the case when the mtd device has no
out-of-band
From: Daniel Santos
[ Upstream commit a788c5272769ddbcdbab297cf386413eeac04463 ]
jffs2_sync_fs makes the assumption that if CONFIG_JFFS2_FS_WRITEBUFFER
is defined then a write buffer is available and has been initialized.
However, this does is not the case when the mtd device has no
out-of-band
On Fri, 2018-10-19 at 08:30:20 UTC, Daniel Santos wrote:
> jffs2_sync_fs makes the assumption that if CONFIG_JFFS2_FS_WRITEBUFFER
> is defined then a write buffer is available and has been initialized.
> However, this does is not the case when the mtd device has no
> out-of-band buffer:
>
> int jf
On Sat, Nov 24, 2018 at 4:32 PM Daniel Santos wrote:
>
> Ping 2!
>
> On 11/05/2018 03:38 PM, Daniel Santos wrote:
> > Ping.
> >
> > Daniel
> >
> > On 10/21/2018 07:32 PM, Hou Tao wrote:
> >> On 2018/10/19 16:30, Daniel Santos wrote:
> >>> jffs2_sync_fs makes the assumption that if CONFIG_JFFS2_FS_
Ping 2!
On 11/05/2018 03:38 PM, Daniel Santos wrote:
> Ping.
>
> Daniel
>
> On 10/21/2018 07:32 PM, Hou Tao wrote:
>> On 2018/10/19 16:30, Daniel Santos wrote:
>>> jffs2_sync_fs makes the assumption that if CONFIG_JFFS2_FS_WRITEBUFFER
>>> is defined then a write buffer is available and has been in
Ping.
Daniel
On 10/21/2018 07:32 PM, Hou Tao wrote:
>
> On 2018/10/19 16:30, Daniel Santos wrote:
>> jffs2_sync_fs makes the assumption that if CONFIG_JFFS2_FS_WRITEBUFFER
>> is defined then a write buffer is available and has been initialized.
>> However, this does is not the case when the mtd d
On 10/21/2018 07:32 PM, Hou Tao wrote:
>
> On 2018/10/19 16:30, Daniel Santos wrote:
>> jffs2_sync_fs makes the assumption that if CONFIG_JFFS2_FS_WRITEBUFFER
>> is defined then a write buffer is available and has been initialized.
>> However, this does is not the case when the mtd device has no
>>
On 2018/10/19 16:30, Daniel Santos wrote:
> jffs2_sync_fs makes the assumption that if CONFIG_JFFS2_FS_WRITEBUFFER
> is defined then a write buffer is available and has been initialized.
> However, this does is not the case when the mtd device has no
> out-of-band buffer:
>
> int jffs2_nand_fla
jffs2_sync_fs makes the assumption that if CONFIG_JFFS2_FS_WRITEBUFFER
is defined then a write buffer is available and has been initialized.
However, this does is not the case when the mtd device has no
out-of-band buffer:
int jffs2_nand_flash_setup(struct jffs2_sb_info *c)
{
if (!c->mtd->
19 matches
Mail list logo
