On Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 09:31:17PM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 12:27:54AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 20, 2008 at 09:05:27PM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> > >...
> > > Adrian reminded us that KCFLAGS=-fno-inline told
> > > another story with more than 100
On Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 12:27:54AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 20, 2008 at 09:05:27PM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> >...
> > Adrian reminded us that KCFLAGS=-fno-inline told
> > another story with more than 100 Section mismatch
> > warnings on 64 bit x86 with an allyesconfig build.
>
On Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 12:27:54AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
On Sun, Jan 20, 2008 at 09:05:27PM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
...
Adrian reminded us that KCFLAGS=-fno-inline told
another story with more than 100 Section mismatch
warnings on 64 bit x86 with an allyesconfig build.
...
Not
On Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 09:31:17PM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
On Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 12:27:54AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
On Sun, Jan 20, 2008 at 09:05:27PM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
...
Adrian reminded us that KCFLAGS=-fno-inline told
another story with more than 100 Section mismatch
On Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 12:27:54AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 20, 2008 at 09:05:27PM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> >...
> > Adrian reminded us that KCFLAGS=-fno-inline told
> > another story with more than 100 Section mismatch
> > warnings on 64 bit x86 with an allyesconfig build.
>
On Sun, Jan 20, 2008 at 09:05:27PM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
>...
> Adrian reminded us that KCFLAGS=-fno-inline told
> another story with more than 100 Section mismatch
> warnings on 64 bit x86 with an allyesconfig build.
>...
Not -fno-inline but -fno-inline-functions-called-once
(completely
On Sun, Jan 20, 2008 at 09:05:27PM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> I have spent the last week (the time I can afford to
> Linux stuff anyway) to improve the Section mismatch
> warnings detected by modpost.
Forgot to mention that all patches are made on top of
kbuild.git but I expect then to apply
I have spent the last week (the time I can afford to
Linux stuff anyway) to improve the Section mismatch
warnings detected by modpost.
The problem until now has been that the Section
mismatch warnings were dependent on the actual
configuration of HOTPLUG, HOTPLUG_CPU and MEMORY_HOTPLUG.
In the
I have spent the last week (the time I can afford to
Linux stuff anyway) to improve the Section mismatch
warnings detected by modpost.
The problem until now has been that the Section
mismatch warnings were dependent on the actual
configuration of HOTPLUG, HOTPLUG_CPU and MEMORY_HOTPLUG.
In the
On Sun, Jan 20, 2008 at 09:05:27PM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
...
Adrian reminded us that KCFLAGS=-fno-inline told
another story with more than 100 Section mismatch
warnings on 64 bit x86 with an allyesconfig build.
...
Not -fno-inline but -fno-inline-functions-called-once
(completely
On Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 12:27:54AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
On Sun, Jan 20, 2008 at 09:05:27PM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
...
Adrian reminded us that KCFLAGS=-fno-inline told
another story with more than 100 Section mismatch
warnings on 64 bit x86 with an allyesconfig build.
...
Not
11 matches
Mail list logo