On Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 06:02:45PM +0200, Karl Hiramoto wrote:
> Hi, i get this a lot now when doing: "rmmod cp2101 io_edgeport "
Why unload both modules? Which device are you having problems with?
And can you duplicate this on a kernel that does not have a closed
source driver loaded into
On Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 06:02:45PM +0200, Karl Hiramoto wrote:
Hi, i get this a lot now when doing: rmmod cp2101 io_edgeport
Why unload both modules? Which device are you having problems with?
And can you duplicate this on a kernel that does not have a closed
source driver loaded into it?
Karl Hiramoto hiramoto.org> writes:
>
> Hi, i get this a lot now when doing: "rmmod cp2101 io_edgeport "
>
> I try and do the rmmod, because i loose comunications on the USB to
> RS-232 adapters.
> [ cut here ]----
> kernel BUG at
Karl Hiramoto karl at hiramoto.org writes:
Hi, i get this a lot now when doing: rmmod cp2101 io_edgeport
I try and do the rmmod, because i loose comunications on the USB to
RS-232 adapters.
[ cut here ]
kernel BUG at kernel/workqueue.c:104!
invalid operand
gular_file): read_ksyms stat /proc/ksyms failed
./ksymoops: No such file or directory
No modules in ksyms, skipping objects
No ksyms, skipping lsmod
Reading Oops report from the terminal
[ cut here ]--------
kernel BUG at kernel/workqueue.c:104!
invalid operand: [#1]
PREEMPT
Modu
): read_ksyms stat /proc/ksyms failed
./ksymoops: No such file or directory
No modules in ksyms, skipping objects
No ksyms, skipping lsmod
Reading Oops report from the terminal
[ cut here ]
kernel BUG at kernel/workqueue.c:104!
invalid operand: [#1]
PREEMPT
Modules linked in: cp2101
On Tue, 25 Jan 2005, Andrew Morton wrote:
> OK, thanks. I get what appears to be a use-after-free error.
> CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC is set:
>
> Program received signal SIGEMT, Emulation trap.
> 0xc0272bc2 in kbd_keycode (keycode=57, down=1, hw_raw=0, regs=0xc0673f9c)
> at
Hi,
On Tue, 25 Jan 2005, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Roman, binary searching indicates that the bug was introduced by
> merge-vt_struct-into-vc_data.patch. The latest version.
Ok, that bug is now really embarrassing. :)
I removed a bit too much from con_close.
bye, Roman
diff -ur -X
Zwane Mwaikambo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 24 Jan 2005, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> > I can't reproduce it from a quick test here. I'd assume that the keystroke
> > came in before the vt's workqueue is initialised. fn_enter() calls
> > put_queue() calls con_schedule_flip() calls
Zwane Mwaikambo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 24 Jan 2005, Andrew Morton wrote:
I can't reproduce it from a quick test here. I'd assume that the keystroke
came in before the vt's workqueue is initialised. fn_enter() calls
put_queue() calls con_schedule_flip() calls schedule_work()
Hi,
On Tue, 25 Jan 2005, Andrew Morton wrote:
Roman, binary searching indicates that the bug was introduced by
merge-vt_struct-into-vc_data.patch. The latest version.
Ok, that bug is now really embarrassing. :)
I removed a bit too much from con_close.
bye, Roman
diff -ur -X
On Tue, 25 Jan 2005, Andrew Morton wrote:
OK, thanks. I get what appears to be a use-after-free error.
CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC is set:
Program received signal SIGEMT, Emulation trap.
0xc0272bc2 in kbd_keycode (keycode=57, down=1, hw_raw=0, regs=0xc0673f9c)
at
On Mon, 24 Jan 2005, Andrew Morton wrote:
> I can't reproduce it from a quick test here. I'd assume that the keystroke
> came in before the vt's workqueue is initialised. fn_enter() calls
> put_queue() calls con_schedule_flip() calls schedule_work() which goes BUG:
Boot into runlevel 1
Zwane Mwaikambo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I pressed a key on a VT during boot and got the following;
>
> usb-storage: device scan complete
> [ cut here ]--------
> kernel BUG at kernel/workqueue.c:104!
> invalid operand: [#1]
> PREEMPT
I pressed a key on a VT during boot and got the following;
usb-storage: device scan complete
[ cut here ]
kernel BUG at kernel/workqueue.c:104!
invalid operand: [#1]
PREEMPT SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC
Modules linked in:
CPU:0
EIP:0060:[]Not tainted VLI
EFLAGS
I pressed a key on a VT during boot and got the following;
usb-storage: device scan complete
[ cut here ]
kernel BUG at kernel/workqueue.c:104!
invalid operand: [#1]
PREEMPT SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC
Modules linked in:
CPU:0
EIP:0060:[c01314af]Not tainted VLI
Zwane Mwaikambo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I pressed a key on a VT during boot and got the following;
usb-storage: device scan complete
[ cut here ]
kernel BUG at kernel/workqueue.c:104!
invalid operand: [#1]
PREEMPT SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC
Modules linked
On Mon, 24 Jan 2005, Andrew Morton wrote:
I can't reproduce it from a quick test here. I'd assume that the keystroke
came in before the vt's workqueue is initialised. fn_enter() calls
put_queue() calls con_schedule_flip() calls schedule_work() which goes BUG:
Boot into runlevel 1 (console
18 matches
Mail list logo
