Christoph Simon wrote:
[]
> kernel BUG at ll_rw_blk.c:711!
[]
> prepare such an event to make it reproducible. In both cases, please
> CC to me, as I'm not on this list.
If you look at the lkml archives at
http://boudicca.tux.org/hypermail/linux-kernel/, for example, you see
this sa
Christoph Simon wrote:
[]
kernel BUG at ll_rw_blk.c:711!
[]
prepare such an event to make it reproducible. In both cases, please
CC to me, as I'm not on this list.
If you look at the lkml archives at
http://boudicca.tux.org/hypermail/linux-kernel/, for example, you see
this same thread every
to find out what was happening and found
netscape in the ``uninterruptible sleep' state. When checking dmesg I
found this message:
---
kernel BUG at ll_rw_blk.c:711!
invalid operand:
CPU:0
EIP:0010:[]
EFLAGS
to find out what was happening and found
netscape in the ``uninterruptible sleep' state. When checking dmesg I
found this message:
---
kernel BUG at ll_rw_blk.c:711!
invalid operand:
CPU:0
EIP:0010:[c016857a
Just got this one:
Sep 25 18:02:01 thecrypt kernel: kernel BUG at ll_rw_blk.c:711!
Sep 25 18:02:01 thecrypt kernel: invalid operand:
Sep 25 18:02:01 thecrypt kernel: CPU:0
Sep 25 18:02:01 thecrypt kernel: EIP:0010:[__make_request+161/1444]
Sep 25 18:02:01 thecrypt kernel: EFLAGS
Just got this one:
Sep 25 18:02:01 thecrypt kernel: kernel BUG at ll_rw_blk.c:711!
Sep 25 18:02:01 thecrypt kernel: invalid operand:
Sep 25 18:02:01 thecrypt kernel: CPU:0
Sep 25 18:02:01 thecrypt kernel: EIP:0010:[__make_request+161/1444]
Sep 25 18:02:01 thecrypt kernel: EFLAGS
Here is the ksymoops decode. This Oops occurs fairly often even after
applying the patch (appended here following the oops), before the patch the
file system was generally extremely slow. The patch was posted by David S.
Miller as a fix for a known bug and may be found at:
[NB. following may not be relevant as seen on box with known upper 32MB
of 128MB DIMM faulty and not in use via mem=96MB]
Oops obtained when exiting Staroffice 5.2. Relevant procs left in
unkillable state :-
F S UIDPID PPID CLS PRI ADDR SZ WCHAN STIME TTY TIME CMD
144 Z
On Wed, 13 Sep 2000, David S. Miller wrote:
> Known bug, Linus just hasn't made a pre-patch in a long
> time with the fix. Here is the fix:
I'd like to confirm that this patch is /needed/ to keep
my system running with 2.4.0-test8...
> --- vanilla/linux/fs/buffer.c Wed Sep 6 08:29:45 2000
>
Thanks Dave.
I normally would have seen the patch floating around in linux-kernel,
but I check the archives on kernelnotes.org and the archives have not
been working since last Sep. 8.
Cheers!
Eloy.-
On Wed, 13 Sep 2000, David S. Miller wrote:
>
> Known bug, Linus just hasn't made a
"Eloy A. Paris" wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> I got an Oops with 2.4.0test8. The message written to syslog said:
>
> Sep 13 02:51:49 antenas kernel: kernel BUG at ll_rw_blk.c:711!
>
> This machine has 128MBytes of memory and at the time of the Opps I was
> runnin
Known bug, Linus just hasn't made a pre-patch in a long
time with the fix. Here is the fix:
--- vanilla/linux/fs/buffer.c Wed Sep 6 08:29:45 2000
+++ linux/fs/buffer.c Sun Sep 10 17:25:26 2000
@@ -1758,13 +1758,13 @@
pos += blocksize;
}
+ err = 0;
+
Hi!
I got an Oops with 2.4.0test8. The message written to syslog said:
Sep 13 02:51:49 antenas kernel: kernel BUG at ll_rw_blk.c:711!
This machine has 128MBytes of memory and at the time of the Opps I was
running Netscape and a big find was running in the background as well
(Debian's daily
Hi!
I got an Oops with 2.4.0test8. The message written to syslog said:
Sep 13 02:51:49 antenas kernel: kernel BUG at ll_rw_blk.c:711!
This machine has 128MBytes of memory and at the time of the Opps I was
running Netscape and a big find was running in the background as well
(Debian's daily
On Wed, 13 Sep 2000, David S. Miller wrote:
Known bug, Linus just hasn't made a pre-patch in a long
time with the fix. Here is the fix:
I'd like to confirm that this patch is /needed/ to keep
my system running with 2.4.0-test8...
--- vanilla/linux/fs/buffer.c Wed Sep 6 08:29:45 2000
+++
Thanks Dave.
I normally would have seen the patch floating around in linux-kernel,
but I check the archives on kernelnotes.org and the archives have not
been working since last Sep. 8.
Cheers!
Eloy.-
On Wed, 13 Sep 2000, David S. Miller wrote:
Known bug, Linus just hasn't made a pre-patch
Known bug, Linus just hasn't made a pre-patch in a long
time with the fix. Here is the fix:
--- vanilla/linux/fs/buffer.c Wed Sep 6 08:29:45 2000
+++ linux/fs/buffer.c Sun Sep 10 17:25:26 2000
@@ -1758,13 +1758,13 @@
pos += blocksize;
}
+ err = 0;
+
Hi all!
I'm not subscribed to the list, but got a crash this morning with the
brand new 2.4.0-pre8. Hope it helps.
BTW, thanks for your great work.
J. Accot
--
[1.] One line summary of the problem:kernel BUG at ll_rw_blk.c:711
[2.] Full description of the problem/report:
First, I
Hi all!
I'm not subscribed to the list, but got a crash this morning with the
brand new 2.4.0-pre8. Hope it helps.
BTW, thanks for your great work.
J. Accot
--
[1.] One line summary of the problem:kernel BUG at ll_rw_blk.c:711
[2.] Full description of the problem/report:
First, I
19 matches
Mail list logo
