We're a little busy right now, we'll try and get to this.
On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 08:09:58PM +0100, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 05:10:17PM +, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > I noticed this problem some time ago when trying to see whether the
> > darcs repository is consistent
On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 05:10:17PM +, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> I noticed this problem some time ago when trying to see whether the
> darcs repository is consistent with the BK one:
>
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=110026570201544&w=2
>
> A solution is to use the "(Logical ch
On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 11:58:07AM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> FYI, I haven't tried using cvsps on the kernel CVS, but I used to use it on
> GCC - and it fell down like this on a constant basis.
Interesting, for me it always worked fine on the kernel until last
month.
> You might want to ta
Andrea Arcangeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> sorry to annoy you about this, but something is going wrong with either
> cvsps or the kernel CVS.
>
> I reproducibly get this as the last changeset, note the date. The
> --bkcvs breaks completely too, but that would be a minor issue since
> cvsps by d
On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 05:42:03PM +0100, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> Any help is appreciated. I'm just starting to look more seriously into
> this since I've some tools that depends on the cvsps to work and kernel
> CVS is the only fully coherent linearized source of info in open format
> (rest is e
Hello,
sorry to annoy you about this, but something is going wrong with either
cvsps or the kernel CVS.
I reproducibly get this as the last changeset, note the date. The
--bkcvs breaks completely too, but that would be a minor issue since
cvsps by default will get it right from the dates that are
6 matches
Mail list logo
