On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 10:33:34AM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> > And I get:
> >
> > [ 1013.864201] PAGE 81000100 (pfn=0): flags=0, count=0
> >
> > So at least no one is using that page. Still it is not clear why it
> > doesn't have the reserve flag turned on.
>
> My hunch is that it
Dan Aloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 06:43:40PM +0200, Dan Aloni wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 06:28:00PM +0200, Dan Aloni wrote:
>> > On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 06:02:43PM +0200, Dan Aloni wrote:
>> > > On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 08:26:03AM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 06:43:40PM +0200, Dan Aloni wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 06:28:00PM +0200, Dan Aloni wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 06:02:43PM +0200, Dan Aloni wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 08:26:03AM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> > > > Dan Aloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> write
On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 06:28:00PM +0200, Dan Aloni wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 06:02:43PM +0200, Dan Aloni wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 08:26:03AM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> > > Dan Aloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > >
> > > > I'm attaching the full logs.
> > >
> > > Thanks.
On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 06:02:43PM +0200, Dan Aloni wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 08:26:03AM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> > Dan Aloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > I'm attaching the full logs.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > > [ 8656.272980] ACPI Error (tbxfroot-0512): Could not map memo
On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 08:26:03AM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Dan Aloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I'm attaching the full logs.
>
> Thanks.
>
> > [ 8656.272980] ACPI Error (tbxfroot-0512): Could not map memory at 040E
> > for length 2 [20060707]
>
> Ok. This looks like the fi
Dan Aloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm attaching the full logs.
Thanks.
> [ 8656.272980] ACPI Error (tbxfroot-0512): Could not map memory at 040E
> for length 2 [20060707]
Ok. This looks like the first sign of trouble.
Normally I would suspect a memory map issue but your e820 memory m
On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 07:05:09AM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Dan Aloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > After upgrading from 2.6.18.3 to 2.6.19.2 on an x86_64 machine I noticed
> > that the EHCI USB host is unable to work properly after a kexec invocation.
> > This makes
On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 07:05:09AM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Dan Aloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > After upgrading from 2.6.18.3 to 2.6.19.2 on an x86_64 machine I noticed
> > that the EHCI USB host is unable to work properly after a kexec invocation.
> > This makes
Dan Aloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello,
>
> After upgrading from 2.6.18.3 to 2.6.19.2 on an x86_64 machine I noticed
> that the EHCI USB host is unable to work properly after a kexec invocation.
> This makes it impossible to mount the rootfs in the configuration I'm using.
>
> According t
Hello,
After upgrading from 2.6.18.3 to 2.6.19.2 on an x86_64 machine I noticed
that the EHCI USB host is unable to work properly after a kexec invocation.
This makes it impossible to mount the rootfs in the configuration I'm using.
According to the prints, the irq changes from 23 to 10.
NOTE:
11 matches
Mail list logo