Re: kexec + ACPI in 2.6.19 (was: Re: kexec + USB storage in 2.6.19)

2007-01-12 Thread Dan Aloni
On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 10:33:34AM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > > And I get: > > > > [ 1013.864201] PAGE 81000100 (pfn=0): flags=0, count=0 > > > > So at least no one is using that page. Still it is not clear why it > > doesn't have the reserve flag turned on. > > My hunch is that it

Re: kexec + ACPI in 2.6.19 (was: Re: kexec + USB storage in 2.6.19)

2007-01-12 Thread Eric W. Biederman
Dan Aloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 06:43:40PM +0200, Dan Aloni wrote: >> On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 06:28:00PM +0200, Dan Aloni wrote: >> > On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 06:02:43PM +0200, Dan Aloni wrote: >> > > On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 08:26:03AM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:

Re: kexec + ACPI in 2.6.19 (was: Re: kexec + USB storage in 2.6.19)

2007-01-12 Thread Dan Aloni
On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 06:43:40PM +0200, Dan Aloni wrote: > On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 06:28:00PM +0200, Dan Aloni wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 06:02:43PM +0200, Dan Aloni wrote: > > > On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 08:26:03AM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > > > > Dan Aloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> write

Re: kexec + ACPI in 2.6.19 (was: Re: kexec + USB storage in 2.6.19)

2007-01-12 Thread Dan Aloni
On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 06:28:00PM +0200, Dan Aloni wrote: > On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 06:02:43PM +0200, Dan Aloni wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 08:26:03AM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > > > Dan Aloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > > > I'm attaching the full logs. > > > > > > Thanks.

Re: kexec + ACPI in 2.6.19 (was: Re: kexec + USB storage in 2.6.19)

2007-01-12 Thread Dan Aloni
On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 06:02:43PM +0200, Dan Aloni wrote: > On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 08:26:03AM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > > Dan Aloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > I'm attaching the full logs. > > > > Thanks. > > > > > [ 8656.272980] ACPI Error (tbxfroot-0512): Could not map memo

kexec + ACPI in 2.6.19 (was: Re: kexec + USB storage in 2.6.19)

2007-01-12 Thread Dan Aloni
On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 08:26:03AM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > Dan Aloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I'm attaching the full logs. > > Thanks. > > > [ 8656.272980] ACPI Error (tbxfroot-0512): Could not map memory at 040E > > for length 2 [20060707] > > Ok. This looks like the fi

Re: kexec + USB storage in 2.6.19

2007-01-12 Thread Eric W. Biederman
Dan Aloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'm attaching the full logs. Thanks. > [ 8656.272980] ACPI Error (tbxfroot-0512): Could not map memory at 040E > for length 2 [20060707] Ok. This looks like the first sign of trouble. Normally I would suspect a memory map issue but your e820 memory m

Re: kexec + USB storage in 2.6.19

2007-01-12 Thread Dan Aloni
On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 07:05:09AM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > Dan Aloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Hello, > > > > After upgrading from 2.6.18.3 to 2.6.19.2 on an x86_64 machine I noticed > > that the EHCI USB host is unable to work properly after a kexec invocation. > > This makes

Re: kexec + USB storage in 2.6.19

2007-01-12 Thread Dan Aloni
On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 07:05:09AM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > Dan Aloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Hello, > > > > After upgrading from 2.6.18.3 to 2.6.19.2 on an x86_64 machine I noticed > > that the EHCI USB host is unable to work properly after a kexec invocation. > > This makes

Re: kexec + USB storage in 2.6.19

2007-01-12 Thread Eric W. Biederman
Dan Aloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hello, > > After upgrading from 2.6.18.3 to 2.6.19.2 on an x86_64 machine I noticed > that the EHCI USB host is unable to work properly after a kexec invocation. > This makes it impossible to mount the rootfs in the configuration I'm using. > > According t

kexec + USB storage in 2.6.19

2007-01-12 Thread Dan Aloni
Hello, After upgrading from 2.6.18.3 to 2.6.19.2 on an x86_64 machine I noticed that the EHCI USB host is unable to work properly after a kexec invocation. This makes it impossible to mount the rootfs in the configuration I'm using. According to the prints, the irq changes from 23 to 10. NOTE: