On (23/01/08 13:14), Olaf Hering didst pronounce:
> On Wed, Jan 23, Mel Gorman wrote:
>
> > Sorry this is dragging out. Can you post the full dmesg with loglevel=8 of
> > the
> > following patch against 2.6.24-rc8 please? It contains the debug information
> > that helped me figure out what was
earlier patches, no idea.
---
mm/slab.c | 17 +
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
--- a/mm/slab.c
+++ b/mm/slab.c
@@ -1590,7 +1590,7 @@ void __init kmem_cache_init(void)
/* Replace the static kmem_list3 structures for the boot cpu */
h table entries: 262144 (order: 9, 2097152 bytes)
freeing bootmem node 1
Memory: 3496632k/3571712k available (6188k kernel code, 75080k reserved, 1324k
data, 1220k bss, 304k init)
Online nodes
o 0
o 1
Nodes with regular memory
o 1
Current running CPU 0 is associated with node 0
Current node is 0
nodeid);
+ printk("init_list RESETTING %s node %d\n", cachep->name, nodeid);
cachep->nodelists[nodeid] = ptr;
local_irq_enable();
}
@@ -1427,10 +1433,23 @@ void __init kmem_cache_init(void)
numa_platform = 0;
}
+ printk("Onli
On Wed, Jan 23, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> Hi Christoph,
>
> On Jan 23, 2008 1:18 AM, Christoph Lameter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > My patch is useless (fascinating history of the changelog there through).
> > fallback_alloc calls kmem_getpages without GFP_THISNODE. This means that
> >
Hi Christoph,
On Jan 23, 2008 1:18 AM, Christoph Lameter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My patch is useless (fascinating history of the changelog there through).
> fallback_alloc calls kmem_getpages without GFP_THISNODE. This means that
> alloc_pages_node() will try to allocate on the current node
Hi Christoph,
On Jan 23, 2008 1:18 AM, Christoph Lameter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My patch is useless (fascinating history of the changelog there through).
fallback_alloc calls kmem_getpages without GFP_THISNODE. This means that
alloc_pages_node() will try to allocate on the current node but
On Wed, Jan 23, Pekka Enberg wrote:
Hi Christoph,
On Jan 23, 2008 1:18 AM, Christoph Lameter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My patch is useless (fascinating history of the changelog there through).
fallback_alloc calls kmem_getpages without GFP_THISNODE. This means that
alloc_pages_node()
kmem_cache
spin_lock_init(ptr-list_lock);
MAKE_ALL_LISTS(cachep, ptr, nodeid);
+ printk(init_list RESETTING %s node %d\n, cachep-name, nodeid);
cachep-nodelists[nodeid] = ptr;
local_irq_enable();
}
@@ -1427,10 +1433,23 @@ void __init kmem_cache_init(void
)
freeing bootmem node 1
Memory: 3496632k/3571712k available (6188k kernel code, 75080k reserved, 1324k
data, 1220k bss, 304k init)
Online nodes
o 0
o 1
Nodes with regular memory
o 1
Current running CPU 0 is associated with node 0
Current node is 0
o kmem_list3_init
kmem_cache_init Setting
changed, 13 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
--- a/mm/slab.c
+++ b/mm/slab.c
@@ -1590,7 +1590,7 @@ void __init kmem_cache_init(void)
/* Replace the static kmem_list3 structures for the boot cpu */
init_list(cache_cache, initkmem_list3[CACHE_CACHE], node
On (23/01/08 13:14), Olaf Hering didst pronounce:
On Wed, Jan 23, Mel Gorman wrote:
Sorry this is dragging out. Can you post the full dmesg with loglevel=8 of
the
following patch against 2.6.24-rc8 please? It contains the debug information
that helped me figure out what was going wrong
(6188k kernel code, 75080k reserved, 1324k
data, 1220k bss, 304k init)
Kernel panic - not syncing: kmem_cache_create(): failed to create slab
`size-32(DMA)'
Rebooting in 1 seconds..
---
mm/slab.c | 17 ++---
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--- a/mm
On Tue, 22 Jan 2008, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> But I doubt that this is it. The fallback logic was added later and it
> worked fine.
My patch is useless (fascinating history of the changelog there through).
fallback_alloc calls kmem_getpages without GFP_THISNODE. This means that
On Tue, 22 Jan 2008, Mel Gorman wrote:
> Rather it should be 2. I'll admit the physical setup of this machine is
> less than ideal but clearly it's something that can happen even if
> it's a bad idea.
Ok. Lets hope that Pekka's find does the trick. But this would mean that
fallback gets
On Wed, 23 Jan 2008, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> When we call fallback_alloc() because the current node has ->nodelists set to
> NULL, we end up calling kmem_getpages() with -1 as the node id which is then
> translated to numa_node_id() by alloc_pages_node. But the reason we called
> fallback_alloc()
On (22/01/08 14:57), Christoph Lameter didst pronounce:
> On Tue, 22 Jan 2008, Mel Gorman wrote:
>
> > > > Whatever this was a problem fixed in the past or not, it's broken again
> > > > now
> > > > :( . It's possible that there is a __GFP_THISNODE that can be dropped
> > > > early
> > > > at
+0xe0/0x14c
[c05c3d50] c00d .kmem_cache_create+0x230/0x4cc
[c05c3e30] c04c05f4 .kmem_cache_init+0x310/0x640
[c05c3ee0] c049f8d8 .start_kernel+0x304/0x3fc
[c05c3f90] c0008594 .start_here_common+0x54/0xc0
0:mon>
I mentio
On Tue, 22 Jan 2008, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > > Whatever this was a problem fixed in the past or not, it's broken again
> > > now
> > > :( . It's possible that there is a __GFP_THISNODE that can be dropped
> > > early
> > > at boot-time that would also fix this problem in a way that doesn't
> > >
device 80x25
console handover: boot [udbg0] -> real [hvc0]
Dentry cache hash table entries: 524288 (order: 10, 4194304 bytes)
Inode-cache hash table entries: 262144 (order: 9, 2097152 bytes)
freeing bootmem node 2
Memory: 4105560k/4194304k available (5004k kernel code, 88744k reserved, 876
On Tue, 22 Jan 2008, Olaf Hering wrote:
> It crashes now in a different way if the patch below is applied:
Yup no l3 structure for the current node. We are early in boostrap. You
could just check if the l3 is there and if not just skip starting the
reaper? This will be redone later anyways.
setup_cpu_cache+0x114/0x1f4
> sp: c075bd40
>msr: 80009032
>dar: 58
> dsisr: 4200
> current = 0xc0665a50
> paca= 0xc0666380
> pid = 0, comm = swapper
> enter ? for help
> [c075bd40] c00fb368 .kmem
sisr: 4200
current = 0xc0665a50
paca= 0xc0666380
pid = 0, comm = swapper
enter ? for help
[c075bd40] c00fb368 .kmem_cache_create+0x3c0/0x478 (unreliable)
[c075be20] c05e6780 .kmem_cache_init+0x284/0x4f4
[c075bee0] c05b
On Tue, 22 Jan 2008, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > After you reverted the slab memoryless node patch there should be per node
> > structures created for node 0 unless the node is marked offline. Is it? If
> > so then you are booting a cpu that is associated with an offline node.
> >
>
> I'll roll a
On (22/01/08 12:11), Christoph Lameter didst pronounce:
> On Tue, 22 Jan 2008, Mel Gorman wrote:
>
> > Christoph/Pekka, this patch is papering over the problem and something
> > more fundamental may be going wrong. The crash occurs because l3 is NULL
> > and the cache is kmem_cache so this is
On Tue, 22 Jan 2008, Mel Gorman wrote:
> Christoph/Pekka, this patch is papering over the problem and something
> more fundamental may be going wrong. The crash occurs because l3 is NULL
> and the cache is kmem_cache so this is early in the boot process. It is
> selecting l3 based on node 2 which
believed. On two test machines here, this kmem_cache_init
problem still happens even with the revert which fixed a third machine. I
was delayed in testing because these boxen unavailable from Friday until
yesterday evening (a stellar display of timing). It was missed on TKO because
it was SLAB-specific an
, this kmem_cache_init
problem still happens even with the revert which fixed a third machine. I
was delayed in testing because these boxen unavailable from Friday until
yesterday evening (a stellar display of timing). It was missed on TKO because
it was SLAB-specific and those machines were testing
On Tue, 22 Jan 2008, Mel Gorman wrote:
Christoph/Pekka, this patch is papering over the problem and something
more fundamental may be going wrong. The crash occurs because l3 is NULL
and the cache is kmem_cache so this is early in the boot process. It is
selecting l3 based on node 2 which is
On (22/01/08 12:11), Christoph Lameter didst pronounce:
On Tue, 22 Jan 2008, Mel Gorman wrote:
Christoph/Pekka, this patch is papering over the problem and something
more fundamental may be going wrong. The crash occurs because l3 is NULL
and the cache is kmem_cache so this is early in
On Tue, 22 Jan 2008, Mel Gorman wrote:
After you reverted the slab memoryless node patch there should be per node
structures created for node 0 unless the node is marked offline. Is it? If
so then you are booting a cpu that is associated with an offline node.
I'll roll a patch that
= 0xc0665a50
paca= 0xc0666380
pid = 0, comm = swapper
enter ? for help
[c075bd40] c00fb368 .kmem_cache_create+0x3c0/0x478 (unreliable)
[c075be20] c05e6780 .kmem_cache_init+0x284/0x4f4
[c075bee0] c05bf8ec .start_kernel+0x2f8/0x3fc
: 4200
current = 0xc0665a50
paca= 0xc0666380
pid = 0, comm = swapper
enter ? for help
[c075bd40] c00fb368 .kmem_cache_create+0x3c0/0x478
(unreliable)
[c075be20] c05e6780 .kmem_cache_init+0x284/0x4f4
[c075bee0
On Tue, 22 Jan 2008, Olaf Hering wrote:
It crashes now in a different way if the patch below is applied:
Yup no l3 structure for the current node. We are early in boostrap. You
could just check if the l3 is there and if not just skip starting the
reaper? This will be redone later anyways. Not
memory
o 2
Current running CPU 0 is associated with node 0
Current node is 0
o kmem_list3_init
kmem_cache_init Setting kmem_cache NULL 0
o kmem_list3_init
kmem_cache_init Setting kmem_cache NULL 1
o kmem_list3_init
kmem_cache_init Setting kmem_cache NULL 2
o kmem_list3_init
kmem_cache_init
On Tue, 22 Jan 2008, Mel Gorman wrote:
Whatever this was a problem fixed in the past or not, it's broken again
now
:( . It's possible that there is a __GFP_THISNODE that can be dropped
early
at boot-time that would also fix this problem in a way that doesn't
affect runtime
+0xe0/0x14c
[c05c3d50] c00d .kmem_cache_create+0x230/0x4cc
[c05c3e30] c04c05f4 .kmem_cache_init+0x310/0x640
[c05c3ee0] c049f8d8 .start_kernel+0x304/0x3fc
[c05c3f90] c0008594 .start_here_common+0x54/0xc0
0:mon
I mentioned
On (22/01/08 14:57), Christoph Lameter didst pronounce:
On Tue, 22 Jan 2008, Mel Gorman wrote:
Whatever this was a problem fixed in the past or not, it's broken again
now
:( . It's possible that there is a __GFP_THISNODE that can be dropped
early
at boot-time that would
On Wed, 23 Jan 2008, Pekka Enberg wrote:
When we call fallback_alloc() because the current node has -nodelists set to
NULL, we end up calling kmem_getpages() with -1 as the node id which is then
translated to numa_node_id() by alloc_pages_node. But the reason we called
fallback_alloc() in the
On Tue, 22 Jan 2008, Mel Gorman wrote:
Rather it should be 2. I'll admit the physical setup of this machine is
less than ideal but clearly it's something that can happen even if
it's a bad idea.
Ok. Lets hope that Pekka's find does the trick. But this would mean that
fallback gets
On Tue, 22 Jan 2008, Christoph Lameter wrote:
But I doubt that this is it. The fallback logic was added later and it
worked fine.
My patch is useless (fascinating history of the changelog there through).
fallback_alloc calls kmem_getpages without GFP_THISNODE. This means that
: kmem_cache_create(): failed to create slab
`size-32(DMA)'
Rebooting in 1 seconds..
---
mm/slab.c | 17 ++---
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--- a/mm/slab.c
+++ b/mm/slab.c
@@ -1590,7 +1590,7 @@ void __init kmem_cache_init(void)
/* Replace the static
On Thu, 17 Jan 2008, Olaf Hering wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 17, Olaf Hering wrote:
>
> > Since -mm boots further, what patch should I try?
>
> rc8-mm1 crashes as well, l3 passed to reap_alien() is NULL.
Sigh. It looks like we need alien cache structures in some cases for nodes
that have no memory.
ng bootstrap. You need to
run kmem_cache_init() on a cpu on a processor with memory.
Or we need to revert the patch which would allocate control
structures again for all online nodes regardless if they have memory or
not.
Does reverting 04231b3002ac53f8a64a7bd142fde3fa4b6808c6 change the
On Fri, Jan 18, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> Could you try this patch?
Does not help, same crash.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read
On Fri, 18 Jan 2008, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> Memoryless nodes: Set N_NORMAL_MEMORY for a node if we do not support HIGHMEM
If !CONFIG_HIGHMEM then
enum node_states {
#ifdef CONFIG_HIGHMEM
N_HIGH_MEMORY, /* The node has regular or high memory */
#else
N_HIGH_MEMORY =
On 1/18/08, Christoph Lameter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Could you try this patch?
>
> Memoryless nodes: Set N_NORMAL_MEMORY for a node if we do not support
> HIGHMEM
>
> It seems that we only scan through zones to set N_NORMAL_MEMORY only if
> CONFIG_HIGHMEM and CONFIG_NUMA are set. We need to
Could you try this patch?
Memoryless nodes: Set N_NORMAL_MEMORY for a node if we do not support HIGHMEM
It seems that we only scan through zones to set N_NORMAL_MEMORY only if
CONFIG_HIGHMEM and CONFIG_NUMA are set. We need to set N_NORMAL_MEMORY
in the !CONFIG_HIGHMEM case.
Signed-off-by:
. it only does this on CONFIG_HIGHMEM which on
> PPC64 is not going to be set so N_NORMAL_MEMORY never gets set on
> POWER That sounds bad.
Argh. We may need to do a
node_set_state(zone_to_nid(zone), N_NORMAL_MEMORY) in the !HIGHMEM case.
> and one of them is in kmem_cache_
MAL_MEMORY slab.c
1593: for_each_node_state(nid, N_NORMAL_MEMORY) {
1971: for_each_node_state(node, N_NORMAL_MEMORY) {
2102: for_each_node_state(node, N_NORMAL_MEMORY) {
3818: for_each_node_state(node, N_NORMAL_MEMORY) {
and one of them is in kmem_cache_init(). That seems v
On Thu, 17 Jan 2008, Olaf Hering wrote:
> Normal 892928 -> 892928
> Movable zone start PFN for each node
> early_node_map[1] active PFN ranges
> 1:0 -> 892928
> Could not find start_pfn for node 0
We only have a single node that is node 1? And then we initialize nodes 0
to
On Thu, 17 Jan 2008, Olaf Hering wrote:
> early_node_map[1] active PFN ranges
> 1:0 -> 892928
> Could not find start_pfn for node 0
Corrupted min_pfn?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More
On Fri, 18 Jan 2008, Olaf Hering wrote:
> calls cache_grow with nodeid 0
> > [c075bbd0] [c00f82d0] .cache_alloc_refill+0x234/0x2c0
> calls cache_grow with nodeid 0
> > [c075bbe0] [c00f7f38] .cache_alloc_node+0x17c/0x1e8
>
> calls cache_grow with nodeid 1
> >
to be set so N_NORMAL_MEMORY never gets set on
POWER That sounds bad.
Argh. We may need to do a
node_set_state(zone_to_nid(zone), N_NORMAL_MEMORY) in the !HIGHMEM case.
and one of them is in kmem_cache_init(). That seems very significant.
Christoph, can you think of possibilities of where
On Fri, Jan 18, Christoph Lameter wrote:
Could you try this patch?
Does not help, same crash.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the
On 1/18/08, Christoph Lameter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could you try this patch?
Memoryless nodes: Set N_NORMAL_MEMORY for a node if we do not support
HIGHMEM
It seems that we only scan through zones to set N_NORMAL_MEMORY only if
CONFIG_HIGHMEM and CONFIG_NUMA are set. We need to set
Could you try this patch?
Memoryless nodes: Set N_NORMAL_MEMORY for a node if we do not support HIGHMEM
It seems that we only scan through zones to set N_NORMAL_MEMORY only if
CONFIG_HIGHMEM and CONFIG_NUMA are set. We need to set N_NORMAL_MEMORY
in the !CONFIG_HIGHMEM case.
Signed-off-by:
) {
1971: for_each_node_state(node, N_NORMAL_MEMORY) {
2102: for_each_node_state(node, N_NORMAL_MEMORY) {
3818: for_each_node_state(node, N_NORMAL_MEMORY) {
and one of them is in kmem_cache_init(). That seems very significant.
Christoph, can you think of possibilities of where
On Thu, 17 Jan 2008, Olaf Hering wrote:
Normal 892928 - 892928
Movable zone start PFN for each node
early_node_map[1] active PFN ranges
1:0 - 892928
Could not find start_pfn for node 0
We only have a single node that is node 1? And then we initialize nodes 0
to 3?
On Fri, 18 Jan 2008, Olaf Hering wrote:
calls cache_grow with nodeid 0
[c075bbd0] [c00f82d0] .cache_alloc_refill+0x234/0x2c0
calls cache_grow with nodeid 0
[c075bbe0] [c00f7f38] .cache_alloc_node+0x17c/0x1e8
calls cache_grow with nodeid 1
On Thu, 17 Jan 2008, Olaf Hering wrote:
early_node_map[1] active PFN ranges
1:0 - 892928
Could not find start_pfn for node 0
Corrupted min_pfn?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo
On Thu, Jan 17, Olaf Hering wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 17, Christoph Lameter wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 17 Jan 2008, Olaf Hering wrote:
> >
> > > The patch does not help.
> >
> > Duh. We need to know more about the problem.
>
> cache_grow is called from 3 places. The third call has cleared l3 for
> some
0x39c (unreliable)
[c075bbd0] [c00f82d0] .cache_alloc_refill+0x234/0x2c0
[c075bc90] [c00f842c] .kmem_cache_alloc+0xd0/0x294
[c075bd40] [c00fb4e8] .kmem_cache_create+0x208/0x478
[c075be20] [c05e670c] .kmem_cache_init+0x218/0x4f4
On Thu, Jan 17, Olaf Hering wrote:
> Since -mm boots further, what patch should I try?
rc8-mm1 crashes as well, l3 passed to reap_alien() is NULL.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at
On Thu, Jan 17, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > freeing bootmem node 1
> > Memory: 3496632k/3571712k available (6188k kernel code, 75080k reserved,
> > 1324k data, 1220k bss, 304k init)
> > cache_grow(2781) swapper(0):c0,j4294937299 cp c06a4fb8 !l3
>
> Is there more backtrace information?
Could you try Pekka's suggestion of reverting
04231b3002ac53f8a64a7bd142fde3fa4b6808c6 ?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the
On Thu, 17 Jan 2008, Olaf Hering wrote:
> The patch does not help.
Duh. We need to know more about the problem.
> > --- linux-2.6.orig/mm/slab.c2008-01-03 12:26:42.0 -0800
> > +++ linux-2.6/mm/slab.c 2008-01-09 15:59:49.0 -0800
> > @@ -2977,7 +2977,10 @@ retry:
> >
On Thu, Jan 17, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Jan 2008, Pekka Enberg wrote:
>
> > Looks similar to the one discussed on linux-mm ("[BUG] at
> > mm/slab.c:3320" thread). Christoph?
>
> Right. Try the latest version of the patch to fix it:
The patch does not help.
> Index:
On Thu, 17 Jan 2008, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> Looks similar to the one discussed on linux-mm ("[BUG] at
> mm/slab.c:3320" thread). Christoph?
Right. Try the latest version of the patch to fix it:
Index: linux-2.6/mm/slab.c
===
---
Hi Olaf,
[Adding Christoph as cc.]
On Jan 15, 2008 5:09 PM, Olaf Hering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Current linus tree crashes in kmem_cache_init, as shown below. The
> system is a 8cpu 2.2GHz POWER5 system, model 9117-570, with 4GB ram.
> Firmware is 240_332, 2.6.23 boots o
Hi Olaf,
[Adding Christoph as cc.]
On Jan 15, 2008 5:09 PM, Olaf Hering [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Current linus tree crashes in kmem_cache_init, as shown below. The
system is a 8cpu 2.2GHz POWER5 system, model 9117-570, with 4GB ram.
Firmware is 240_332, 2.6.23 boots ok with the same config
On Thu, Jan 17, Christoph Lameter wrote:
On Thu, 17 Jan 2008, Pekka Enberg wrote:
Looks similar to the one discussed on linux-mm ([BUG] at
mm/slab.c:3320 thread). Christoph?
Right. Try the latest version of the patch to fix it:
The patch does not help.
Index: linux-2.6/mm/slab.c
Could you try Pekka's suggestion of reverting
04231b3002ac53f8a64a7bd142fde3fa4b6808c6 ?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ
On Thu, 17 Jan 2008, Olaf Hering wrote:
The patch does not help.
Duh. We need to know more about the problem.
--- linux-2.6.orig/mm/slab.c2008-01-03 12:26:42.0 -0800
+++ linux-2.6/mm/slab.c 2008-01-09 15:59:49.0 -0800
@@ -2977,7 +2977,10 @@ retry:
}
On Thu, Jan 17, Christoph Lameter wrote:
freeing bootmem node 1
Memory: 3496632k/3571712k available (6188k kernel code, 75080k reserved,
1324k data, 1220k bss, 304k init)
cache_grow(2781) swapper(0):c0,j4294937299 cp c06a4fb8 !l3
Is there more backtrace information? What
On Thu, Jan 17, Olaf Hering wrote:
Since -mm boots further, what patch should I try?
rc8-mm1 crashes as well, l3 passed to reap_alien() is NULL.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at
] [c00f82d0] .cache_alloc_refill+0x234/0x2c0
[c075bc90] [c00f842c] .kmem_cache_alloc+0xd0/0x294
[c075bd40] [c00fb4e8] .kmem_cache_create+0x208/0x478
[c075be20] [c05e670c] .kmem_cache_init+0x218/0x4f4
[c075bee0] [c05bf8ec
On Thu, Jan 17, Olaf Hering wrote:
On Thu, Jan 17, Christoph Lameter wrote:
On Thu, 17 Jan 2008, Olaf Hering wrote:
The patch does not help.
Duh. We need to know more about the problem.
cache_grow is called from 3 places. The third call has cleared l3 for
some reason.
Typo in
On Tue, Jan 15, Olaf Hering wrote:
>
> Current linus tree crashes in kmem_cache_init, as shown below. The
> system is a 8cpu 2.2GHz POWER5 system, model 9117-570, with 4GB ram.
> Firmware is 240_332, 2.6.23 boots ok with the same config.
>
> There is a series of mm related pat
Current linus tree crashes in kmem_cache_init, as shown below. The
system is a 8cpu 2.2GHz POWER5 system, model 9117-570, with 4GB ram.
Firmware is 240_332, 2.6.23 boots ok with the same config.
There is a series of mm related patches in 2.6.24-rc1:
commit
Current linus tree crashes in kmem_cache_init, as shown below. The
system is a 8cpu 2.2GHz POWER5 system, model 9117-570, with 4GB ram.
Firmware is 240_332, 2.6.23 boots ok with the same config.
There is a series of mm related patches in 2.6.24-rc1:
commit
On Tue, Jan 15, Olaf Hering wrote:
Current linus tree crashes in kmem_cache_init, as shown below. The
system is a 8cpu 2.2GHz POWER5 system, model 9117-570, with 4GB ram.
Firmware is 240_332, 2.6.23 boots ok with the same config.
There is a series of mm related patches in 2.6.24-rc1
On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 02:26:08PM +0200, Frederik Deweerdt wrote:
> On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 11:00:46AM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 09:40:24AM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > > >I've bisected it down to the x86_64-mm-cpa-kerneltext.patch and the
> > > >
> > > >+ if
On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 11:00:46AM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 09:40:24AM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > >I've bisected it down to the x86_64-mm-cpa-kerneltext.patch and the
> > >
> > >+ if (!pte_present(*kpte))
> > >+ return 0;
> >
> > I the most recent
On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 09:40:24AM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >I've bisected it down to the x86_64-mm-cpa-kerneltext.patch and the
> >
> >+ if (!pte_present(*kpte))
> >+ return 0;
>
> I the most recent version of the patch I sent to Andi this line is gone
> (again),
> as I
>I've bisected it down to the x86_64-mm-cpa-kerneltext.patch and the
>
>+ if (!pte_present(*kpte))
>+ return 0;
I the most recent version of the patch I sent to Andi this line is gone (again),
as I realized it was wrong on i386 (namely for DEBUG_PAGEALLOC) and its
respective
I've bisected it down to the x86_64-mm-cpa-kerneltext.patch and the
+ if (!pte_present(*kpte))
+ return 0;
I the most recent version of the patch I sent to Andi this line is gone (again),
as I realized it was wrong on i386 (namely for DEBUG_PAGEALLOC) and its
respective
On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 09:40:24AM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
I've bisected it down to the x86_64-mm-cpa-kerneltext.patch and the
+ if (!pte_present(*kpte))
+ return 0;
I the most recent version of the patch I sent to Andi this line is gone
(again),
as I realized it
On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 11:00:46AM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 09:40:24AM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
I've bisected it down to the x86_64-mm-cpa-kerneltext.patch and the
+ if (!pte_present(*kpte))
+ return 0;
I the most recent version of the
On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 02:26:08PM +0200, Frederik Deweerdt wrote:
On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 11:00:46AM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 09:40:24AM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
I've bisected it down to the x86_64-mm-cpa-kerneltext.patch and the
+ if
On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 12:12:29AM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 07:22:33PM +0200, Frederik Deweerdt wrote:
> > On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 01:49:55AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > >
> > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.21/2.6.21-mm1/
> > >
>
On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 07:22:33PM +0200, Frederik Deweerdt wrote:
> On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 01:49:55AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >
> > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.21/2.6.21-mm1/
> >
> Hi all,
>
> My computer fails early at boot with a stack along the
> My computer fails early at boot with a stack along the lines of:
>
> kmem_cache_zalloc
> kmem_cache_create
> kmem_cache_init
> start_kernel
>
> eip is at cache_calloc_refill+0x3e1 which is the
> slabp->colouroff = colouroff; in alloc_slabmgmt()
&
On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 01:49:55AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.21/2.6.21-mm1/
>
Hi all,
My computer fails early at boot with a stack along the lines of:
kmem_cache_zalloc
kmem_cache_create
kmem_cache_init
start_ke
On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 01:49:55AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.21/2.6.21-mm1/
Hi all,
My computer fails early at boot with a stack along the lines of:
kmem_cache_zalloc
kmem_cache_create
kmem_cache_init
start_kernel
eip
the lines of:
kmem_cache_zalloc
kmem_cache_create
kmem_cache_init
start_kernel
eip is at cache_calloc_refill+0x3e1 which is the
slabp-colouroff = colouroff; in alloc_slabmgmt()
I've bisected it down to the x86_64-mm-cpa-kerneltext.patch and the
+ if (!pte_present(*kpte
On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 07:22:33PM +0200, Frederik Deweerdt wrote:
On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 01:49:55AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.21/2.6.21-mm1/
Hi all,
My computer fails early at boot with a stack along the lines of:
On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 12:12:29AM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 07:22:33PM +0200, Frederik Deweerdt wrote:
On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 01:49:55AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.21/2.6.21-mm1/
Hi all,
On Mon, 2 Apr 2007, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> This patch makes kmem_cache_init() trigger a BUG when the calls to
> kmalloc() fail. Altough the kernel would not boot anyway on failure,
> this adds some clarity to the code.
Indeed. This keeps popping up again and again, so
Acked-by: Pek
Hi,
This patch makes kmem_cache_init() trigger a BUG when the calls to
kmalloc() fail. Altough the kernel would not boot anyway on failure,
this adds some clarity to the code.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
diff --git a/mm/slab.c b/mm/slab.c
index 57f7aa4..6d7e486
1 - 100 of 106 matches
Mail list logo
