On Tuesday 22 January 2008, Al Boldi wrote:
> Chris Mason wrote:
> > Running fsync in data=ordered means that all of the dirty blocks on the
> > FS will get written before fsync returns.
>
> Hm, that's strange, I expected this kind of behaviour from data=journal.
>
> data=writeback should return
Chris Mason wrote:
> Running fsync in data=ordered means that all of the dirty blocks on the FS
> will get written before fsync returns.
Hm, that's strange, I expected this kind of behaviour from data=journal.
data=writeback should return immediatly, which seems it does, but
data=ordered should
On Tuesday 22 January 2008, Al Boldi wrote:
> Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * Oliver Pinter (Pintér Olivér) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > and then please update to CFS-v24.1
> > > http://people.redhat.com/~mingo/cfs-scheduler/sched-cfs-v2.6.22.15-v24.
> > >1 .patch
> > >
> > > > Yes with CFSv20.4, as
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Oliver Pinter (Pintér Olivér) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > and then please update to CFS-v24.1
> > http://people.redhat.com/~mingo/cfs-scheduler/sched-cfs-v2.6.22.15-v24.1
> >.patch
> >
> > > Yes with CFSv20.4, as in the log.
> > >
> > > It also hangs on 2.6.23.13
>
> my
* Oliver Pinter (Pintér Olivér) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> and then please update to CFS-v24.1
> http://people.redhat.com/~mingo/cfs-scheduler/sched-cfs-v2.6.22.15-v24.1.patch
> > Yes with CFSv20.4, as in the log.
> >
> > It also hangs on 2.6.23.13
my feeling is that this is some sort of
* Oliver Pinter (Pintér Olivér) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
and then please update to CFS-v24.1
http://people.redhat.com/~mingo/cfs-scheduler/sched-cfs-v2.6.22.15-v24.1.patch
Yes with CFSv20.4, as in the log.
It also hangs on 2.6.23.13
my feeling is that this is some sort of timing
Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Oliver Pinter (Pintér Olivér) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
and then please update to CFS-v24.1
http://people.redhat.com/~mingo/cfs-scheduler/sched-cfs-v2.6.22.15-v24.1
.patch
Yes with CFSv20.4, as in the log.
It also hangs on 2.6.23.13
my feeling is that this is
On Tuesday 22 January 2008, Al Boldi wrote:
Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Oliver Pinter (Pintér Olivér) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
and then please update to CFS-v24.1
http://people.redhat.com/~mingo/cfs-scheduler/sched-cfs-v2.6.22.15-v24.
1 .patch
Yes with CFSv20.4, as in the log.
Chris Mason wrote:
Running fsync in data=ordered means that all of the dirty blocks on the FS
will get written before fsync returns.
Hm, that's strange, I expected this kind of behaviour from data=journal.
data=writeback should return immediatly, which seems it does, but
data=ordered should
On Tuesday 22 January 2008, Al Boldi wrote:
Chris Mason wrote:
Running fsync in data=ordered means that all of the dirty blocks on the
FS will get written before fsync returns.
Hm, that's strange, I expected this kind of behaviour from data=journal.
data=writeback should return
On Sun, 2008-01-20 at 08:41 +0300, Al Boldi wrote:
> logic. Any ideas how this could be fixed?
BTW, no idea, fs is taboo land here. (panic() is my very favorite
function...;)
-Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
On Sun, 2008-01-20 at 08:41 +0300, Al Boldi wrote:
> BTW Mike: Your server bounces my messages.
Hm. I don't have a server. Might have something to do with some
naughty task frequently scribbling zeros to /etc/resolv.conf when I
brutally reboot my box (i give myself cause to do that quite a
Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Sat, 2008-01-19 at 21:14 +0300, Al Boldi wrote:
> > I was just attacked by some deadlock issue involving sqlite3 and
> > konqueror. While sqlite3 continues to slowly fill a 7M-record db in
> > transaction mode, konqueror hangs for a few minutes, then continues only
> >
add cc (ingo)
and then please update to CFS-v24.1
http://people.redhat.com/~mingo/cfs-scheduler/sched-cfs-v2.6.22.15-v24.1.patch
On 1/19/08, Al Boldi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Oliver Pinter (Pintér Olivér) wrote:
> > This kernel is vanilla 2.6.22.y or with CFS?
>
> Yes
Oliver Pinter (Pintér Olivér) wrote:
> This kernel is vanilla 2.6.22.y or with CFS?
Yes with CFSv20.4, as in the log.
It also hangs on 2.6.23.13
> On 1/19/08, Al Boldi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I was just attacked by some deadlock issue involving sqlite3 and
> > konqueror. While sqlite3
This kernel is vanilla 2.6.22.y or with CFS?
On 1/19/08, Al Boldi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was just attacked by some deadlock issue involving sqlite3 and konqueror.
> While sqlite3 continues to slowly fill a 7M-record db in transaction mode,
> konqueror hangs for a few minutes, then
I was just attacked by some deadlock issue involving sqlite3 and konqueror.
While sqlite3 continues to slowly fill a 7M-record db in transaction mode,
konqueror hangs for a few minutes, then continues only to hang again and again.
Looks like an fs/blockIO issue involving fsync.
As a workaround,
I was just attacked by some deadlock issue involving sqlite3 and konqueror.
While sqlite3 continues to slowly fill a 7M-record db in transaction mode,
konqueror hangs for a few minutes, then continues only to hang again and again.
Looks like an fs/blockIO issue involving fsync.
As a workaround,
This kernel is vanilla 2.6.22.y or with CFS?
On 1/19/08, Al Boldi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was just attacked by some deadlock issue involving sqlite3 and konqueror.
While sqlite3 continues to slowly fill a 7M-record db in transaction mode,
konqueror hangs for a few minutes, then continues
Oliver Pinter (Pintér Olivér) wrote:
This kernel is vanilla 2.6.22.y or with CFS?
Yes with CFSv20.4, as in the log.
It also hangs on 2.6.23.13
On 1/19/08, Al Boldi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was just attacked by some deadlock issue involving sqlite3 and
konqueror. While sqlite3 continues
add cc (ingo)
and then please update to CFS-v24.1
http://people.redhat.com/~mingo/cfs-scheduler/sched-cfs-v2.6.22.15-v24.1.patch
On 1/19/08, Al Boldi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oliver Pinter (Pintér Olivér) wrote:
This kernel is vanilla 2.6.22.y or with CFS?
Yes with
Mike Galbraith wrote:
On Sat, 2008-01-19 at 21:14 +0300, Al Boldi wrote:
I was just attacked by some deadlock issue involving sqlite3 and
konqueror. While sqlite3 continues to slowly fill a 7M-record db in
transaction mode, konqueror hangs for a few minutes, then continues only
to hang
On Sun, 2008-01-20 at 08:41 +0300, Al Boldi wrote:
BTW Mike: Your server bounces my messages.
Hm. I don't have a server. Might have something to do with some
naughty task frequently scribbling zeros to /etc/resolv.conf when I
brutally reboot my box (i give myself cause to do that quite a
On Sun, 2008-01-20 at 08:41 +0300, Al Boldi wrote:
logic. Any ideas how this could be fixed?
BTW, no idea, fs is taboo land here. (panic() is my very favorite
function...;)
-Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to
24 matches
Mail list logo
