> > My plan is to extract the minimal set of features from your patchset,
> > that solves the dirty balancing deadlocks and submit them as quickly
> > as possible.
>
> I had hoped to post a new version yesterday, but lets hope for today.
Would be cool.
> > After that we can look at trying to sol
On Fri, 2007-08-03 at 08:43 +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> (cc restored)
>
> > > > There were heaps of problems in there and it is surprising how few
> > > > people
> > > > were hitting them. Ordered-mode journalling filesystems will fix it
> > > > all up
> > > > behind the scenes, of course.
>
(cc restored)
> > > There were heaps of problems in there and it is surprising how few people
> > > were hitting them. Ordered-mode journalling filesystems will fix it all
> > > up
> > > behind the scenes, of course.
> > >
> > > I just have a bad feeling about that code - list_heads are the wro
> There were heaps of problems in there and it is surprising how few people
> were hitting them. Ordered-mode journalling filesystems will fix it all up
> behind the scenes, of course.
>
> I just have a bad feeling about that code - list_heads are the wrong data
> structure and it all needs to be
On Thu, 02 Aug 2007 17:52:39 +0200
Miklos Szeredi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > The following strange behavior can be observed:
> > >
> > > 1. large file is written
> > > 2. after 30 seconds, nr_dirty goes down by 1024
> > > 3. then for some time (< 30 sec) nothing happens (disk idle)
> > > 4.
> > The following strange behavior can be observed:
> >
> > 1. large file is written
> > 2. after 30 seconds, nr_dirty goes down by 1024
> > 3. then for some time (< 30 sec) nothing happens (disk idle)
> > 4. then nr_dirty again goes down by 1024
> > 5. repeat from 3. until whole file is written
>
On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 10:45:16PM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> The following strange behavior can be observed:
>
> 1. large file is written
> 2. after 30 seconds, nr_dirty goes down by 1024
> 3. then for some time (< 30 sec) nothing happens (disk idle)
> 4. then nr_dirty again goes down by 1024
On Wed, 01 Aug 2007 22:45:16 +0200
Miklos Szeredi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The following strange behavior can be observed:
>
> 1. large file is written
> 2. after 30 seconds, nr_dirty goes down by 1024
> 3. then for some time (< 30 sec) nothing happens (disk idle)
> 4. then nr_dirty again goe
The following strange behavior can be observed:
1. large file is written
2. after 30 seconds, nr_dirty goes down by 1024
3. then for some time (< 30 sec) nothing happens (disk idle)
4. then nr_dirty again goes down by 1024
5. repeat from 3. until whole file is written
So basically a 4Mbyte chunk
9 matches
Mail list logo
