> But TSC is a "required feature", so "cpu_has_tsc" is always true.
Hmm? It isn't. What makes you think so?
cpufeature.h:
#define cpu_has_tsc boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_TSC)
% grep -i tsc include/asm-i386/required-features.h
%
> How about this patch:
> ===
> Don't try to disable the
On Mon, 2007-06-04 at 20:12 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > >
> > > Looks like this one got lost in rc3-mm1.
> >
> > Andi said that he fixed the zero-divide by other means?
>
> I determined it cannot happen in my source tree. When notsc
> is passed TSC CPUID is cleared and sched-clock works.
>
> I s
> >
> > Looks like this one got lost in rc3-mm1.
>
> Andi said that he fixed the zero-divide by other means?
I determined it cannot happen in my source tree. When notsc
is passed TSC CPUID is cleared and sched-clock works.
I suspect what happens is that lguest forgets to clear the TSC cpuid
bit
On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 10:28:20AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Jun 2007 12:19:33 -0500 Matt Mackall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 09:27:40AM +1000, Rusty Russell wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2007-05-22 at 17:38 -0500, Matt Mackall wrote:
> > > > [0.120007] EIP is
On Mon, 4 Jun 2007 12:19:33 -0500 Matt Mackall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 09:27:40AM +1000, Rusty Russell wrote:
> > On Tue, 2007-05-22 at 17:38 -0500, Matt Mackall wrote:
> > > [0.120007] EIP is at resync_sc_freq+0x4b/0x56
> >
> > Hi Matt,
> >
> > Thanks for th
On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 09:27:40AM +1000, Rusty Russell wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-05-22 at 17:38 -0500, Matt Mackall wrote:
> > [0.120007] EIP is at resync_sc_freq+0x4b/0x56
>
> Hi Matt,
>
> Thanks for the report! Andrew should have these two patches queued,
> but here they are again:
>
>
6 matches
Mail list logo
