RE: libata-dev queue updated

2005-08-26 Thread Tomita, Haruo
Hi Bunk, Thank you for your replay. > With SCSI=m and SCSI_SATA=y this allows the static enabling > of the SATA drivers with unwanted effects, e.g.: > - SCSI=m, SCSI_SATA=y, SCSI_ATA_ADMA=y > -> SCSI_ATA_ADMA is built statically but scsi/built-in.o is > not linked > into the kernel > -

Re: libata-dev queue updated

2005-08-25 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Fri, Aug 26, 2005 at 09:04:37AM +0900, Tomita, Haruo wrote: > On Thursday, August 25, 2005 8:02 PM (JST), Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > > 2.6.13- rc7-libata1.patch.bz2 was used. > > > A combined mode of ata_piix seems not to work. > > > Is the following patches correct? > > > > > > diff -urN lin

RE: libata-dev queue updated

2005-08-25 Thread Tomita, Haruo
On Thursday, August 25, 2005 8:02 PM (JST), Adrian Bunk wrote: > > 2.6.13- rc7-libata1.patch.bz2 was used. > > A combined mode of ata_piix seems not to work. > > Is the following patches correct? > > > > diff -urN linux-2.6.13-rc7.orig/drivers/scsi/Kconfig > linux-2.6.13-rc7/drivers/scsi/Kcon

Re: libata-dev queue updated

2005-08-25 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 03:56:23PM +0900, Tomita, Haruo wrote: > Hi Jeff, > > 2.6.13- rc7-libata1.patch.bz2 was used. > A combined mode of ata_piix seems not to work. > Is the following patches correct? > > diff -urN linux-2.6.13-rc7.orig/drivers/scsi/Kconfig > linux-2.6.13-rc7/drivers/scsi/K

RE: libata-dev queue updated

2005-08-24 Thread Tomita, Haruo
Hi Jeff, 2.6.13- rc7-libata1.patch.bz2 was used. A combined mode of ata_piix seems not to work. Is the following patches correct? diff -urN linux-2.6.13-rc7.orig/drivers/scsi/Kconfig linux-2.6.13-rc7/drivers/scsi/Kconfig --- linux-2.6.13-rc7.orig/drivers/scsi/Kconfig 2005-08-25 13:44:33.0

libata-dev queue updated

2005-08-23 Thread Jeff Garzik
Recent updates: * core: ATAPI fixes from Tejun Heo and Albert Lee * sata_promise: new PCI IDs * sata_sil: don't apply mod15write fix to 3125/3114 chips * ahci: "HD LED always on" fix git users: 'ALL' branch of rsync://rsync.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/libata-dev.git Patch: ht

Re: [git] libata-dev queue updated

2005-08-22 Thread Jeff Garzik
Daniel Drake wrote: Hi Jeff, Jeff Garzik wrote: I finally got around to creating something that has been missing since BitKeeper disappeared, and something that Andrew has been wanting from me for a while: an amalgamation of all the libata-dev branches that I maintain internally. You are m

Re: [git] libata-dev queue updated

2005-08-19 Thread Jeff Garzik
Brett Russ wrote: Jeff Garzik wrote: In such cases, patches are divided into branches by category: ncq (NCQ queueing support), chs-support (C/H/S support), adma (new ADMA driver), sil24 (new Silicon Image 312x driver), passthru (ATA passthrough/SMART support), etc. Jeff, The below doesn't s

Re: [git] libata-dev queue updated

2005-08-19 Thread Brett Russ
Jeff Garzik wrote: In such cases, patches are divided into branches by category: ncq (NCQ queueing support), chs-support (C/H/S support), adma (new ADMA driver), sil24 (new Silicon Image 312x driver), passthru (ATA passthrough/SMART support), etc. Jeff, The below doesn't seem to include NCQ.

Re: [git] libata-dev queue updated

2005-08-19 Thread Daniel Drake
Hi Jeff, Jeff Garzik wrote: I finally got around to creating something that has been missing since BitKeeper disappeared, and something that Andrew has been wanting from me for a while: an amalgamation of all the libata-dev branches that I maintain internally. You are missing two sata_promise

[git] libata-dev queue updated

2005-08-18 Thread Jeff Garzik
I finally got around to creating something that has been missing since BitKeeper disappeared, and something that Andrew has been wanting from me for a while: an amalgamation of all the libata-dev branches that I maintain internally. First, a bit of background. Most patches I receive are dumped

Re: [SATA] libata-dev queue updated

2005-03-29 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jeff Garzik napsal(a): Merged recent upstream changes into libata-dev queue. No new patches have found their way into libata-dev since last email. BK URL, Patch URL, and changelog attached. Note that the patch is diff'd against 2.6.11-bk6, which won't exist until four hours after this email is

[SATA] libata-dev queue updated

2005-03-09 Thread Jeff Garzik
Merged recent upstream changes into libata-dev queue. No new patches have found their way into libata-dev since last email. BK URL, Patch URL, and changelog attached. Note that the patch is diff'd against 2.6.11-bk6, which won't exist until four hours after this email is sent. Jeff BK

[SATA] libata-dev queue updated

2005-03-08 Thread Jeff Garzik
Rediffing against latest kernel. See attached. BK users: bk pull bk://gkernel.bkbits.net/libata-dev-2.6 Patch: http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/jgarzik/libata/2.6.11-bk4-libata-dev1.patch.bz2 This will update the following files: drivers/scsi/Kconfig | 18 driv

Re: [SATA] libata-dev queue updated

2005-03-04 Thread Joerg Sommrey
On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 11:06:23PM +0100, Joerg Sommrey wrote: > On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 03:43:38PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote: > > Joerg Sommrey wrote: > > >On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 01:07:16PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote: > > > > > >>Joerg Sommrey wrote: > > >> > > >>>On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 02:10:14AM

Re: [SATA] libata-dev queue updated

2005-03-04 Thread Joerg Sommrey
On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 03:43:38PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote: > Joerg Sommrey wrote: > >On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 01:07:16PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote: > > > >>Joerg Sommrey wrote: > >> > >>>On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 02:10:14AM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote: > >>> > >>> > Joerg Sommrey wrote: > > >>>

Re: [SATA] libata-dev queue updated

2005-03-04 Thread Jeff Garzik
Joerg Sommrey wrote: On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 01:07:16PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote: Joerg Sommrey wrote: On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 02:10:14AM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote: Joerg Sommrey wrote: On Thu, Mar 03, 2005 at 11:09:26PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote: Joerg Sommrey wrote: On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 05:4

Re: [SATA] libata-dev queue updated

2005-03-04 Thread Joerg Sommrey
On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 01:07:16PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote: > Joerg Sommrey wrote: > >On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 02:10:14AM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote: > > > >>Joerg Sommrey wrote: > >> > >>>On Thu, Mar 03, 2005 at 11:09:26PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote: > >>> > >>> > Joerg Sommrey wrote: > > >>>

Re: [SATA] libata-dev queue updated

2005-03-04 Thread Jeff Garzik
Joerg Sommrey wrote: On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 02:10:14AM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote: Joerg Sommrey wrote: On Thu, Mar 03, 2005 at 11:09:26PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote: Joerg Sommrey wrote: On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 05:43:59PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote: Joerg Sommrey wrote: Jeff Garzik wrote: Patch: h

Re: [SATA] libata-dev queue updated

2005-03-04 Thread Joerg Sommrey
On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 02:10:14AM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote: > Joerg Sommrey wrote: > >On Thu, Mar 03, 2005 at 11:09:26PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote: > > > >>Joerg Sommrey wrote: > >> > >>>On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 05:43:59PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote: > >>> > >>> > Joerg Sommrey wrote: > > >>>

Re: [SATA] libata-dev queue updated

2005-03-03 Thread Joerg Sommrey
On Thu, Mar 03, 2005 at 11:09:26PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote: > Joerg Sommrey wrote: > >On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 05:43:59PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote: > > > >>Joerg Sommrey wrote: > >> > >>>Jeff Garzik wrote: > >>> > Patch: > http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/jgarzik/libata/2.6.11-

Re: [SATA] libata-dev queue updated

2005-03-03 Thread Jeff Garzik
Joerg Sommrey wrote: On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 05:43:59PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote: Joerg Sommrey wrote: Jeff Garzik wrote: Patch: http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/jgarzik/libata/2.6.11-rc5-bk4-libata-dev1.patch.bz2 Still not usable here. The same errors as before when backing up: Plea

Re: [SATA] libata-dev queue updated

2005-03-03 Thread Joerg Sommrey
On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 05:43:59PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote: > Joerg Sommrey wrote: > >Jeff Garzik wrote: > >>Patch: > >>http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/jgarzik/libata/2.6.11-rc5-bk4-libata-dev1.patch.bz2 > > > > > >Still not usable here. The same errors as before when backing up: >

Re: [SATA] libata-dev queue updated

2005-03-02 Thread Jeff Garzik
Joerg Sommrey wrote: Jeff Garzik wrote: BK users: bk pull bk://gkernel.bkbits.net/libata-dev-2.6 Patch: http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/jgarzik/libata/2.6.11-rc5-bk4-libata-dev1.patch.bz2 Still not usable here. The same errors as before when backing up: Please try 2.6.11 without

Re: [SATA] libata-dev queue updated

2005-03-02 Thread Joerg Sommrey
Jeff Garzik wrote: >BK users: > bk pull bk://gkernel.bkbits.net/libata-dev-2.6 >Patch: >http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/jgarzik/libata/2.6.11-rc5-bk4-libata-dev1.patch.bz2 Still not usable here. The same errors as before when backing up: Mar 2 21:09:50 bear kernel: ata1:

[SATA] libata-dev queue updated

2005-03-01 Thread Jeff Garzik
A minor update, mostly to update to the latest kernel. BK users: bk pull bk://gkernel.bkbits.net/libata-dev-2.6 Patch: http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/jgarzik/libata/2.6.11-rc5-bk4-libata-dev1.patch.bz2 This will update the following files: drivers/scsi/Kconfig |

Re: [SATA] libata-dev queue updated

2005-02-19 Thread Jeff Garzik
Andre Tomt wrote: Jeff Garzik wrote: Patch URL, BK URL, and changelog attached. Recent changes: * New sata_qstor driver. * Turn on ATAPI by default. * Change a couple unconditional use-the-hardware function calls to be callbacks instead. Should have been this way originally. * Most of C/H/S supp

Re: [SATA] libata-dev queue updated

2005-02-19 Thread Andre Tomt
Jeff Garzik wrote: Patch URL, BK URL, and changelog attached. Recent changes: * New sata_qstor driver. * Turn on ATAPI by default. * Change a couple unconditional use-the-hardware function calls to be callbacks instead. Should have been this way originally. * Most of C/H/S support. * Fix bugs in

[SATA] libata-dev queue updated

2005-02-19 Thread Jeff Garzik
Patch URL, BK URL, and changelog attached. Recent changes: * New sata_qstor driver. * Turn on ATAPI by default. * Change a couple unconditional use-the-hardware function calls to be callbacks instead. Should have been this way originally. * Most of C/H/S support. * Fix bugs in ADMA driver. * Sup

[SATA] libata-dev queue updated

2005-02-13 Thread Jeff Garzik
A minor update since the last post. Recent changes: * updated to 2.6.11-rc4, posted patch (see attached). * turned on ATAPI by default. If you got an S/ATAPI DVD burner for Christmas, you'll like this. WARNING DANGER WARNING: Some drivers such as sata_promise and ahci have not yet been update

[SATA] libata-dev queue updated, status report

2005-02-06 Thread Jeff Garzik
libata-dev-2.6, the development queue for the Linux SATA driver libata, has been updated. See attachment for BK info, patch URL, and full list of changes. Here is a quick summary of the goodies lurking in libata-dev, and also the Reason Why It's Not Upstream (RWINU): 1) ATA passthru. Arbitra