On Tue, 05 Jun 2007 18:16:25 EDT, Jeff Garzik said:
> On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 11:03:45PM +0100, Russell King wrote:
> > And rather than configuring your MUA to ignore the header...
>
> > You're using mutt, mutt can be configured so.
>
> So, you are seriously proposing that EVERYONE reconfigure
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 11:03:45PM +0100, Russell King wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 05:48:30PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 10:38:15PM +0100, Russell King wrote:
> > > There is one final point on this which I wish to make, in case anyone
> > > has decided that this is
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 05:48:30PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 10:38:15PM +0100, Russell King wrote:
> > There is one final point on this which I wish to make, in case anyone
> > has decided that this is caused by some recent change at my end.
> >
> > I've been adding this
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 10:38:15PM +0100, Russell King wrote:
> There is one final point on this which I wish to make, in case anyone
> has decided that this is caused by some recent change at my end.
>
> I've been adding this header to all my messages for about the last seven
> years. It's only
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 10:25:23PM +0100, Russell King wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 12:27:45PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> > From: Russell King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 16:21:33 +0100
> >
> > > Oh sod it, I'm unsubscribing from LKML. Jeff, hope your happy.
> >
> > What
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 12:27:45PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Russell King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 16:21:33 +0100
>
> > Oh sod it, I'm unsubscribing from LKML. Jeff, hope your happy.
>
> What an adult way for you to handle this.
Indeed; it's obvious that you're not
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 12:23:35PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Russell King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 15:59:46 +0100
>
> > It's the fact that I _am_ CC'd on replies, so I get one message from LKML
> > one from the original poster, maybe one via another mailing list if
On 06/05/2007 03:24 PM, David Miller wrote:
>
> I totally agree, Russel you are being totally unreasonable.
>
^^
Uh-oh.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at
From: Russell King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 16:21:33 +0100
> Oh sod it, I'm unsubscribing from LKML. Jeff, hope your happy.
What an adult way for you to handle this.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL
From: Russell King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 16:18:47 +0100
> On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 11:11:04AM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > You are NOT more important that everyone else.
>
> That's not the issue.
Yes it is, you're imposing your lousy solution to your
problems on other
From: Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 11:11:04 -0400
> On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 03:59:46PM +0100, Russell King wrote:
> > Give me a way to stop people CC'ing me on replies and I'll happily remove
> > the header. Unfortunately there isn't, so I can't.
>
> So by fiat, you
From: Russell King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 15:59:46 +0100
> It's the fact that I _am_ CC'd on replies, so I get one message from LKML
> one from the original poster, maybe one via another mailing list if it's
> also copied there. Add that in to the mix of all the other mail
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 04:50:56PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> > If you don't have DMA capabilities, does libata still need ->pad and
> > ->pad_dma set?
>
> It shouldn't - nor the prd. You don't need to use the default
> ata_port_start in this case. I've just added ata_sff_port_start to my
> tree
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 11:41:57AM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 04:18:47PM +0100, Russell King wrote:
> > Meanwhile you decide that you have a right over _MY_ personal preferences.
> > It's the same argument I'm afraid, just a different point of view. If
> > _you_ do not
> If you don't have DMA capabilities, does libata still need ->pad and
> ->pad_dma set?
It shouldn't - nor the prd. You don't need to use the default
ata_port_start in this case. I've just added ata_sff_port_start to my
tree which figures out which to allocate for SFF devices.
-
To unsubscribe
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 04:18:47PM +0100, Russell King wrote:
> Meanwhile you decide that you have a right over _MY_ personal preferences.
> It's the same argument I'm afraid, just a different point of view. If
> _you_ do not wish to abide by the header then turn off that feature in
> your
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 04:18:47PM +0100, Russell King wrote:
> > If you are unwilling to fix the problem and work within existing
> > community email standards, I think it would be fair to ask vger
> > postmaster to start excising Mail-Followup-To headers.
>
> Well, that will leave me with _no_
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 11:11:04AM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 03:59:46PM +0100, Russell King wrote:
> > It's the fact that I _am_ CC'd on replies, so I get one message from LKML
> > one from the original poster, maybe one via another mailing list if it's
> > also copied
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 03:59:46PM +0100, Russell King wrote:
> It's the fact that I _am_ CC'd on replies, so I get one message from LKML
> one from the original poster, maybe one via another mailing list if it's
> also copied there. Add that in to the mix of all the other mail hitting
> my MTA
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 10:56:03AM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 03:51:49PM +0100, Russell King wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 10:35:23AM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > >
> > > BTW, please fix your mailer. It emits Mail-Followup-To headers that
> > > hijack everyone on
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 03:51:49PM +0100, Russell King wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 10:35:23AM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> >
> > BTW, please fix your mailer. It emits Mail-Followup-To headers that
> > hijack everyone on the thread into the To field, breaking the normal
> > LKML To/CC
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 10:35:23AM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>
> BTW, please fix your mailer. It emits Mail-Followup-To headers that
> hijack everyone on the thread into the To field, breaking the normal
> LKML To/CC standard replying mechanism that has been working for a
> decade.
Sorry, I
BTW, please fix your mailer. It emits Mail-Followup-To headers that
hijack everyone on the thread into the To field, breaking the normal
LKML To/CC standard replying mechanism that has been working for a
decade.
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 03:17:14PM +0100, Russell King wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 09:56:08AM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 12:22:18PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> > > > NAK
> > > >
> > > > We have generic devices and generic DMA mapping. libata already uses
> > > > the
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 09:56:08AM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 12:22:18PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> > > NAK
> > >
> > > We have generic devices and generic DMA mapping. libata already uses
> > > the generic stuff. Now fix the platform...
> >
> > Nice theory but your
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 12:22:18PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> > NAK
> >
> > We have generic devices and generic DMA mapping. libata already uses
> > the generic stuff. Now fix the platform...
>
> Nice theory but your generic helpers rely on the map functions working
> even for generic hardware
> NAK
>
> We have generic devices and generic DMA mapping. libata already uses
> the generic stuff. Now fix the platform...
Nice theory but your generic helpers rely on the map functions working
even for generic hardware that doesn't need them, so at the very least
there is some clean up
> > The 32-bit sparc port has some but those PCMCIA controllers aren't
> > going to be supported in the foreseeable future, you have to abstract
> > out all the inb/outb etc. operations to go through the pcmcia
> > controller driver for one thing.
Thats one place iomap might actually save the day
The 32-bit sparc port has some but those PCMCIA controllers aren't
going to be supported in the foreseeable future, you have to abstract
out all the inb/outb etc. operations to go through the pcmcia
controller driver for one thing.
Thats one place iomap might actually save the day as you
NAK
We have generic devices and generic DMA mapping. libata already uses
the generic stuff. Now fix the platform...
Nice theory but your generic helpers rely on the map functions working
even for generic hardware that doesn't need them, so at the very least
there is some clean up required.
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 12:22:18PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
NAK
We have generic devices and generic DMA mapping. libata already uses
the generic stuff. Now fix the platform...
Nice theory but your generic helpers rely on the map functions working
even for generic hardware that doesn't
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 09:56:08AM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 12:22:18PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
NAK
We have generic devices and generic DMA mapping. libata already uses
the generic stuff. Now fix the platform...
Nice theory but your generic helpers rely
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 03:17:14PM +0100, Russell King wrote:
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 09:56:08AM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 12:22:18PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
NAK
We have generic devices and generic DMA mapping. libata already uses
the generic stuff. Now
BTW, please fix your mailer. It emits Mail-Followup-To headers that
hijack everyone on the thread into the To field, breaking the normal
LKML To/CC standard replying mechanism that has been working for a
decade.
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 10:35:23AM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
BTW, please fix your mailer. It emits Mail-Followup-To headers that
hijack everyone on the thread into the To field, breaking the normal
LKML To/CC standard replying mechanism that has been working for a
decade.
Sorry, I will
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 03:51:49PM +0100, Russell King wrote:
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 10:35:23AM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
BTW, please fix your mailer. It emits Mail-Followup-To headers that
hijack everyone on the thread into the To field, breaking the normal
LKML To/CC standard
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 10:56:03AM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 03:51:49PM +0100, Russell King wrote:
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 10:35:23AM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
BTW, please fix your mailer. It emits Mail-Followup-To headers that
hijack everyone on the thread
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 03:59:46PM +0100, Russell King wrote:
It's the fact that I _am_ CC'd on replies, so I get one message from LKML
one from the original poster, maybe one via another mailing list if it's
also copied there. Add that in to the mix of all the other mail hitting
my MTA and
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 11:11:04AM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 03:59:46PM +0100, Russell King wrote:
It's the fact that I _am_ CC'd on replies, so I get one message from LKML
one from the original poster, maybe one via another mailing list if it's
also copied there.
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 04:18:47PM +0100, Russell King wrote:
If you are unwilling to fix the problem and work within existing
community email standards, I think it would be fair to ask vger
postmaster to start excising Mail-Followup-To headers.
Well, that will leave me with _no_ _choice_
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 04:18:47PM +0100, Russell King wrote:
Meanwhile you decide that you have a right over _MY_ personal preferences.
It's the same argument I'm afraid, just a different point of view. If
_you_ do not wish to abide by the header then turn off that feature in
your mailer.
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 11:41:57AM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 04:18:47PM +0100, Russell King wrote:
Meanwhile you decide that you have a right over _MY_ personal preferences.
It's the same argument I'm afraid, just a different point of view. If
_you_ do not wish to
If you don't have DMA capabilities, does libata still need -pad and
-pad_dma set?
It shouldn't - nor the prd. You don't need to use the default
ata_port_start in this case. I've just added ata_sff_port_start to my
tree which figures out which to allocate for SFF devices.
-
To unsubscribe from
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 04:50:56PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
If you don't have DMA capabilities, does libata still need -pad and
-pad_dma set?
It shouldn't - nor the prd. You don't need to use the default
ata_port_start in this case. I've just added ata_sff_port_start to my
tree which
From: Russell King [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 15:59:46 +0100
It's the fact that I _am_ CC'd on replies, so I get one message from LKML
one from the original poster, maybe one via another mailing list if it's
also copied there. Add that in to the mix of all the other mail hitting
From: Jeff Garzik [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 11:11:04 -0400
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 03:59:46PM +0100, Russell King wrote:
Give me a way to stop people CC'ing me on replies and I'll happily remove
the header. Unfortunately there isn't, so I can't.
So by fiat, you decide that
From: Russell King [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 16:18:47 +0100
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 11:11:04AM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
You are NOT more important that everyone else.
That's not the issue.
Yes it is, you're imposing your lousy solution to your
problems on other people.
From: Russell King [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 16:21:33 +0100
Oh sod it, I'm unsubscribing from LKML. Jeff, hope your happy.
What an adult way for you to handle this.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL
On 06/05/2007 03:24 PM, David Miller wrote:
I totally agree, Russel you are being totally unreasonable.
^^
Uh-oh.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 12:23:35PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
From: Russell King [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 15:59:46 +0100
It's the fact that I _am_ CC'd on replies, so I get one message from LKML
one from the original poster, maybe one via another mailing list if it's
also
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 12:27:45PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
From: Russell King [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 16:21:33 +0100
Oh sod it, I'm unsubscribing from LKML. Jeff, hope your happy.
What an adult way for you to handle this.
Indeed; it's obvious that you're not listening
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 10:25:23PM +0100, Russell King wrote:
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 12:27:45PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
From: Russell King [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 16:21:33 +0100
Oh sod it, I'm unsubscribing from LKML. Jeff, hope your happy.
What an adult way
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 10:38:15PM +0100, Russell King wrote:
There is one final point on this which I wish to make, in case anyone
has decided that this is caused by some recent change at my end.
I've been adding this header to all my messages for about the last seven
years. It's only
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 05:48:30PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 10:38:15PM +0100, Russell King wrote:
There is one final point on this which I wish to make, in case anyone
has decided that this is caused by some recent change at my end.
I've been adding this header
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 11:03:45PM +0100, Russell King wrote:
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 05:48:30PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 10:38:15PM +0100, Russell King wrote:
There is one final point on this which I wish to make, in case anyone
has decided that this is caused by
On Tue, 05 Jun 2007 18:16:25 EDT, Jeff Garzik said:
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 11:03:45PM +0100, Russell King wrote:
And rather than configuring your MUA to ignore the header...
You're using mutt, mutt can be configured so.
So, you are seriously proposing that EVERYONE reconfigure their
From: Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 14:30:05 +0100
>> There are PCMCIA controllers and PCI/PCMCIA/Cardbus adapters for the
>> Sparc platform I thought ?
On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 02:22:43PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> The 32-bit sparc port has some but those PCMCIA controllers
On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 08:47:19AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> The right fix is the depend on the new HAS_DMA (or whatever it's called)
ACK... if the platform truly does not do DMA.
> symbol. The proper long-term fix is to move calln to the dam mapping
> functions from the core libata
From: Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 14:30:05 +0100
> > It really makes no sense to allow this on Sparc, there are no
> > non-PCI Sparc ATA controllers.
>
> There are PCMCIA controllers and PCI/PCMCIA/Cardbus adapters for the
> Sparc platform I thought ?
The 32-bit sparc
> > CONFIG_PCI=n
> > CONFIG_ATA=m
> >
> > This seems to be a valid configuration since libata can drive non-PCI
> > devices too?
Yep.
> It really makes no sense to allow this on Sparc, there are no
> non-PCI Sparc ATA controllers.
There are PCMCIA controllers and PCI/PCMCIA/Cardbus adapters
[ Your email has `m68k' in the body, so I read it :-]
On Sun, 3 Jun 2007, David Miller wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/ata/Kconfig b/drivers/ata/Kconfig
> index b4a8d60..7d893a6 100644
> --- a/drivers/ata/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/ata/Kconfig
> @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ menuconfig ATA
> depends on BLOCK
On Sun, Jun 03, 2007 at 05:40:10PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Meelis Roos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2007 23:23:33 +0300 (EEST)
>
> > I accidentally enabled libata config options on my Sun Ultra 1 (sparc64,
> > UP, no PCI, only SBUS):
> >
> > MODPOST 440 modules
> > ERROR:
On Sun, Jun 03, 2007 at 05:40:10PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
From: Meelis Roos [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2007 23:23:33 +0300 (EEST)
I accidentally enabled libata config options on my Sun Ultra 1 (sparc64,
UP, no PCI, only SBUS):
MODPOST 440 modules
ERROR: dma_unmap_sg
[ Your email has `m68k' in the body, so I read it :-]
On Sun, 3 Jun 2007, David Miller wrote:
diff --git a/drivers/ata/Kconfig b/drivers/ata/Kconfig
index b4a8d60..7d893a6 100644
--- a/drivers/ata/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/ata/Kconfig
@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ menuconfig ATA
depends on BLOCK
CONFIG_PCI=n
CONFIG_ATA=m
This seems to be a valid configuration since libata can drive non-PCI
devices too?
Yep.
It really makes no sense to allow this on Sparc, there are no
non-PCI Sparc ATA controllers.
There are PCMCIA controllers and PCI/PCMCIA/Cardbus adapters for the
Sparc
From: Alan Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 14:30:05 +0100
It really makes no sense to allow this on Sparc, there are no
non-PCI Sparc ATA controllers.
There are PCMCIA controllers and PCI/PCMCIA/Cardbus adapters for the
Sparc platform I thought ?
The 32-bit sparc port has
On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 08:47:19AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
The right fix is the depend on the new HAS_DMA (or whatever it's called)
ACK... if the platform truly does not do DMA.
symbol. The proper long-term fix is to move calln to the dam mapping
functions from the core libata
From: Alan Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 14:30:05 +0100
There are PCMCIA controllers and PCI/PCMCIA/Cardbus adapters for the
Sparc platform I thought ?
On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 02:22:43PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
The 32-bit sparc port has some but those PCMCIA controllers aren't
From: Meelis Roos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2007 23:23:33 +0300 (EEST)
> I accidentally enabled libata config options on my Sun Ultra 1 (sparc64,
> UP, no PCI, only SBUS):
>
> MODPOST 440 modules
> ERROR: "dma_unmap_sg" [drivers/ata/libata.ko] undefined!
> ERROR: "dma_map_sg"
I accidentally enabled libata config options on my Sun Ultra 1 (sparc64,
UP, no PCI, only SBUS):
MODPOST 440 modules
ERROR: "dma_unmap_sg" [drivers/ata/libata.ko] undefined!
ERROR: "dma_map_sg" [drivers/ata/libata.ko] undefined!
ERROR: "dma_unmap_single" [drivers/ata/libata.ko] undefined!
I accidentally enabled libata config options on my Sun Ultra 1 (sparc64,
UP, no PCI, only SBUS):
MODPOST 440 modules
ERROR: dma_unmap_sg [drivers/ata/libata.ko] undefined!
ERROR: dma_map_sg [drivers/ata/libata.ko] undefined!
ERROR: dma_unmap_single [drivers/ata/libata.ko] undefined!
ERROR:
From: Meelis Roos [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2007 23:23:33 +0300 (EEST)
I accidentally enabled libata config options on my Sun Ultra 1 (sparc64,
UP, no PCI, only SBUS):
MODPOST 440 modules
ERROR: dma_unmap_sg [drivers/ata/libata.ko] undefined!
ERROR: dma_map_sg
72 matches
Mail list logo
