Andries Brouwer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 03:14:36PM -0800, Nick Stoughton wrote:
> > Most Unix implementations behave in the manner specified by POSIX. One
> > notable exception is Solaris 8 (I don't know about later Solarises).
It's still the same on Solaris 10.
Andries Brouwer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 03:14:36PM -0800, Nick Stoughton wrote:
Most Unix implementations behave in the manner specified by POSIX. One
notable exception is Solaris 8 (I don't know about later Solarises).
It's still the same on Solaris 10.
On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 03:14:36PM -0800, Nick Stoughton wrote:
> On Linux, the link() system call does not dereference symbolic links
>
> This behavior does not conform to POSIX
>
> Most Unix implementations behave in the manner specified by POSIX. One
> notable exception is Solaris 8 (I don't
On Linux, the link() system call does not dereference symbolic links: if
oldpath is a symbolic link, then newpath is created as a new hard link
to the same symbolic link file. (In other words, newpath is also a
symbolic link to the same file that oldpath refers to.) E.g. (using
shell commands to
On Linux, the link() system call does not dereference symbolic links: if
oldpath is a symbolic link, then newpath is created as a new hard link
to the same symbolic link file. (In other words, newpath is also a
symbolic link to the same file that oldpath refers to.) E.g. (using
shell commands to
On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 03:14:36PM -0800, Nick Stoughton wrote:
On Linux, the link() system call does not dereference symbolic links
This behavior does not conform to POSIX
Most Unix implementations behave in the manner specified by POSIX. One
notable exception is Solaris 8 (I don't know
6 matches
Mail list logo