linux-next: first tree

2008-02-14 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, I have created the first cut of the linux-next tree at git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sfr/linux-next.git. Things to know about this tree: It has two branches - master and stable. Stable is currently just Linus' tree and will never rebase. Master will rebase on an almost

Re: linux-next: first tree

2008-02-14 Thread Jiri Kosina
On Fri, 15 Feb 2008, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > The tree consists of subsystem git and quilt trees. Currently, the > quilt trees are integrated by importing them into appropriately based > git branches and then merging those branches. Now, would it be possible to have somewhere listed the URL

Re: linux-next: first tree

2008-02-14 Thread Stephen Rothwell
On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 15:06:28 +0100 (CET) Jiri Kosina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Fri, 15 Feb 2008, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > The tree consists of subsystem git and quilt trees. Currently, the > > quilt trees are integrated by importing them into appropriately based > > git branches an

Re: linux-next: first tree

2008-02-14 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Thursday, 14 of February 2008, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > I have created the first cut of the linux-next tree at > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sfr/linux-next.git. > > Things to know about this tree: > > It has two branches - master and stable. Stable is currently

Re: linux-next: first tree

2008-02-14 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Rafael, On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 15:45:55 +0100 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Perhaps you can add: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lenb/linux-acpi-2.6 test I would prefer that the trees be added by the subsystem maintainers and they can tell me which branch

Re: linux-next: first tree

2008-02-14 Thread Martin Schwidefsky
On Fri, 2008-02-15 at 02:00 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > I would prefer that the trees be added by the subsystem maintainers and > they can tell me which branch represents their expectations for the next > kernel release (in this case 2.6.26). But thanks, hopefully you will have > prodded them

Re: linux-next: first tree

2008-02-14 Thread Paul Mundt
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 02:00:19AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Rafael, > > On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 15:45:55 +0100 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > Perhaps you can add: > > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lenb/linux-acpi-2.6 test > > I would prefer t

Re: linux-next: first tree

2008-02-14 Thread Dave Kleikamp
On Fri, 2008-02-15 at 02:00 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > I would prefer that the trees be added by the subsystem maintainers and > they can tell me which branch represents their expectations for the next > kernel release (in this case 2.6.26). But thanks, hopefully you will have > prodded them

Re: linux-next: first tree

2008-02-14 Thread Andy Whitcroft
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 12:35:37AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > I have created the first cut of the linux-next tree at > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sfr/linux-next.git. > > Things to know about this tree: > > It has two branches - master and stable. Stable is c

Re: linux-next: first tree

2008-02-14 Thread Mauro Carvalho Chehab
> The tree currently contains: > Greg's driver-core, pci and usb quilt series (in that order) > Alasdair Kergon's device-mapper quilt tree > Jiri Kosina's hid git tree > Jean Delvare's i2c quilt tree > Randy Dunlap's kernel-doc quilt tree > Haavard Skinnemoen's

Re: linux-next: first tree

2008-02-14 Thread Yinghai Lu
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 5:35 AM, Stephen Rothwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all, > > I have created the first cut of the linux-next tree at > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sfr/linux-next.git. > > Things to know about this tree: > > It has two branches - master and stable.

Re: linux-next: first tree

2008-02-14 Thread Benny Halevy
On Feb. 14, 2008, 20:29 +0200, "Yinghai Lu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 5:35 AM, Stephen Rothwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I have created the first cut of the linux-next tree at >> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sfr/linux-next.git. >> >>

Re: linux-next: first tree

2008-02-14 Thread Sam Ravnborg
> > Also, more trees please ... :-) git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sam/kbuild.git master It is rebased from time to time and is what gets into -mm Sam -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: linux-next: first tree

2008-02-14 Thread Greg KH
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 12:35:37AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > So, comments, please. Could you change the Makefile to show that if we build and run this tree, it really isn't Linus's tree? Yes, I know the -git number will be different, but that might not be very obvious to people reading

Re: linux-next: first tree

2008-02-14 Thread Jeff Garzik
Stephen Rothwell wrote: Also, more trees please ... :-) Please add the 'NEXT' branch of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/libata-dev.git to your list. This is a throwaway meta-branch that is rebased often. The 'master' branch of libata-dev.git always contains the base co

Re: linux-next: first tree

2008-02-14 Thread Jeff Garzik
Jeff Garzik wrote: Please add the 'NEXT' branch of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/libata-dev.git to your list. This is a throwaway meta-branch that is rebased often. Additional FYI: Don't be worried if "git diff master..NEXT" is empty from time to time. This condition

Re: linux-next: first tree

2008-02-14 Thread Sam Ravnborg
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 12:20:32PM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 12:35:37AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > > So, comments, please. > > Could you change the Makefile to show that if we build and run this > tree, it really isn't Linus's tree? Yes, I know the -git number wil

Re: linux-next: first tree

2008-02-14 Thread James Bottomley
On Thu, 2008-02-14 at 16:03 -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote: > Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Also, more trees please ... :-) > > Please add the 'NEXT' branch of > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/libata-dev.git > > to your list. This is a throwaway meta-branch that is rebased often

Re: linux-next: first tree

2008-02-14 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Paul, On Fri, 15 Feb 2008 00:49:28 +0900 Paul Mundt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > For SH: > > master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lethal/sh-2.6.git Added, thanks. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/ pgpsZoqKbvwi

Re: linux-next: first tree

2008-02-14 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Dave, On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 09:54:02 -0600 Dave Kleikamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Please add: > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/shaggy/jfs-2.6.git next Added, thanks. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/ pgp0s5

Re: linux-next: first tree

2008-02-14 Thread Jeff Garzik
James Bottomley wrote: So does this indicate the meaning of upstream and upstream-fixes is still the same? I always took upstream-fixes to be bug fixes for this -rc and upstream as queued for the next merge window, in which case NEXT would be the union of those two sets? In practice, #upstrea

Re: linux-next: first tree

2008-02-14 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Martin, On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 16:25:09 +0100 Martin Schwidefsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > For the s390 architecture please use the "features" branch of git390: > > git://git390.osdl.marist.edu/pub/scm/linux-2.6.git features Added thanks. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell[EM

Re: linux-next: first tree

2008-02-14 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Mauro, On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 15:38:50 -0200 Mauro Carvalho Chehab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Please add v4l-dvb tree, at: > > ssh://master.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mchehab/linux-next.git > > The above tree has two branches: 'master' and 'stable' > > Both branches will have V4L/

Re: linux-next: first tree

2008-02-14 Thread Trond Myklebust
On Fri, 2008-02-15 at 00:35 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Also, more trees please ... :-) Please add the 'linux-next' branch of git://git.linux-nfs.org/projects/trondmy/nfs-2.6.git Cheers Trond -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of

Re: linux-next: first tree

2008-02-14 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Greg, On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 12:20:32 -0800 Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Could you change the Makefile to show that if we build and run this > tree, it really isn't Linus's tree? Yes, I know the -git number will be > different, but that might not be very obvious to people reading bug >

Re: linux-next: first tree

2008-02-14 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Sam, On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 21:23:23 +0100 Sam Ravnborg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sam/kbuild.git master Added, thanks. > It is rebased from time to time and is what gets into -mm That's fine. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell[EM

Re: linux-next: first tree

2008-02-14 Thread David Chinner
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 12:35:37AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Also, more trees please ... :-) The current XFS tree that goes into -mm is: git://oss.sgi.com:8090/xfs/xfs-2.6.git master Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner Principal Engineer SGI Australian Software Group -- To unsubscribe from th

Re: linux-next: first tree

2008-02-14 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Sam, On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 21:50:31 +0100 Sam Ravnborg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > A non-intrusive way to do so would be to add a file in the > top-level directory and name it localversion*. > > For example: > echo '-next' > localversion-next Excellent, I will do this for the next release.

Re: linux-next: first tree

2008-02-14 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Jeff, On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 16:03:19 -0500 Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Please add the 'NEXT' branch of > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/libata-dev.git > > to your list. This is a throwaway meta-branch that is rebased often. Added, thanks. > I will continu

Re: linux-next: first tree

2008-02-14 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Trond, On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 17:27:57 -0500 Trond Myklebust <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Please add the 'linux-next' branch of > > git://git.linux-nfs.org/projects/trondmy/nfs-2.6.git Added, thanks. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.canb.auug.org.

Re: linux-next: first tree

2008-02-14 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi David, On Fri, 15 Feb 2008 10:17:02 +1100 David Chinner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The current XFS tree that goes into -mm is: > > git://oss.sgi.com:8090/xfs/xfs-2.6.git master Added, thanks. I have put you as the contact point - is this correct? I notice that the MAINTAINERS file has a

Re: linux-next: first tree

2008-02-14 Thread David Chinner
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 11:50:40AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi David, > > On Fri, 15 Feb 2008 10:17:02 +1100 David Chinner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > The current XFS tree that goes into -mm is: > > > > git://oss.sgi.com:8090/xfs/xfs-2.6.git master > > Added, thanks. > > I have p

Re: linux-next: first tree

2008-02-14 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi David, On Fri, 15 Feb 2008 12:10:42 +1100 David Chinner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I notice that the > > MAINTAINERS file has a different contact for XFS. > > Yup - [EMAIL PROTECTED] If you want a real person > on the end of problem reports feel free to leave me there, > but you should r

Re: linux-next: first tree

2008-02-14 Thread Len Brown
On Thursday 14 February 2008 10:00, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Rafael, > > On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 15:45:55 +0100 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > Perhaps you can add: > > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lenb/linux-acpi-2.6 test > > I would prefer that th

Re: linux-next: first tree

2008-02-14 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Len, On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 23:58:38 -0500 Len Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Rafael has it right, please add the branch above. > It will include both the upcoming ACPI and suspend patches. Added, thanks, with you as contact. > Note that I reserve the right to re-base it from time to time

Re: linux-next: first tree

2008-02-15 Thread Bryan Wu
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 9:35 PM, Stephen Rothwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all, > > I have created the first cut of the linux-next tree at > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sfr/linux-next.git. > > Things to know about this tree: > > It has two branches - master and stable.

Re: linux-next: first tree

2008-02-15 Thread J. Bruce Fields
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 05:27:57PM -0500, Trond Myklebust wrote: > > On Fri, 2008-02-15 at 00:35 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > > Also, more trees please ... :-) > > Please add the 'linux-next' branch of > > git://git.linux-nfs.org/projects/trondmy/nfs-2.6.git And 'nfsd-next' at

Re: linux-next: first tree

2008-02-16 Thread Stephen Rothwell
On Fri, 15 Feb 2008 16:33:50 +0800 "Bryan Wu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Could you please add Blackfin tree to the linux-next > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/cooloney/blackfin-2.6.git > for-linus Added, thanks. > And do you have the blackfin cross-compile toolchain? No, I

Re: linux-next: first tree

2008-02-16 Thread Stefan Richter
On 15 Feb, Stephen Rothwell wrote at LKML: > I have created the first cut of the linux-next tree at > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sfr/linux-next.git. > > Things to know about this tree: > > It has two branches - master and stable. Stable is currently just Linus' > tree and will

Re: linux-next: first tree

2008-02-16 Thread Stephen Rothwell
On Sat, 16 Feb 2008 16:13:40 +0100 (CET) Stefan Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Stephen, please add the for-next branch of linux1394-2.6.git to your > tree to receive updates for drivers/firewire/ and drivers/ieee1394/. > The URL is > > master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ieee1

Re: linux-next: first tree

2008-02-16 Thread Stephen Rothwell
On Fri, 15 Feb 2008 16:00:57 -0500 "J. Bruce Fields" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > And 'nfsd-next' at > > git://git.linux-nfs.org/~bfields/linux.git nfsd-next Added, thanks. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell[EMAIL PROTECTED] pgpflTt6G2U1N.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: linux-next: first tree

2008-02-16 Thread Robin Getz
On Sat 16 Feb 2008 10:33, Stephen Rothwell pondered: > On Fri, 15 Feb 2008 16:33:50 +0800 "Bryan Wu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Could you please add Blackfin tree to the linux-next > > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/cooloney/blackfin-2.6.git > > for-linus > > Added, th

Re: linux-next: first tree

2008-02-16 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Robin, On Sat, 16 Feb 2008 21:23:47 -0500 Robin Getz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > You can grab (i386 rpms and tar ball) that should work from: > > http://blackfin.uclinux.org/gf/project/toolchain/frs/?action=FrsReleaseView&release_id=375 > > You will need: > - toolchain blackfin-toolchain-

Re: linux-next: first tree

2008-02-17 Thread Mark M. Hoffman
Hi Stephen: * Stephen Rothwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-02-15 00:35:37 +1100]: > I have created the first cut of the linux-next tree at > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sfr/linux-next.git. > > Things to know about this tree: > > It has two branches - master and stable. Stable is

Re: linux-next: first tree

2008-02-17 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Mark, On Sun, 17 Feb 2008 14:09:57 -0500 "Mark M. Hoffman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > You can add the hwmon testing tree (from MAINTAINERS): > > > git lm-sensors.org:/kernel/mhoffman/hwmon-2.6.git testing > > This tree gets rebased pretty much whenever Linus adds a new tag. As a > rule

Re: linux-next: first tree

2008-02-18 Thread Artem Bityutskiy
Hi, Stephen Rothwell wrote: Also, more trees please ... :-) The UBI tree which is here: git://git.infradead.org/~dedekind/ubi-2.6.git master -- Best Regards, Artem Bityutskiy (Артём Битюцкий) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message

Re: linux-next: first tree

2008-02-18 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Artem, On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 10:04:17 +0200 Artem Bityutskiy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The UBI tree which is here: > > git://git.infradead.org/~dedekind/ubi-2.6.git master Added, thanks. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell[EMAIL PROTECTED] pgpeNJ4XqKixk.pgp Description: PGP

Re: linux-next: first tree

2008-02-18 Thread Paolo Ciarrocchi
On Feb 14, 2008 2:35 PM, Stephen Rothwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all, > > I have created the first cut of the linux-next tree at Hi Stephen, I would like to update the "The development process" section in Documentation/HOWTO including some information about the linux-next tree. I underst

Re: linux-next: first tree

2008-02-18 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Paolo, On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 12:11:33 +0100 "Paolo Ciarrocchi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I would like to update the "The development process" section in > Documentation/HOWTO including some information about the linux-next tree. > > I understand what it's including but I didn't get how it w

Re: linux-next: first tree

2008-02-18 Thread Mauro Carvalho Chehab
On Fri, 15 Feb 2008 09:24:14 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Mauro, > > On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 15:38:50 -0200 Mauro Carvalho Chehab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > Please add v4l-dvb tree, at: > > > > ssh://master.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mchehab/linux-next.g

Re: linux-next: first tree

2008-02-20 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Andy, On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 16:04:36 + Andy Whitcroft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > As devout believers in testing things early we test -mm and -git releases > as they drop. I am keen that we are able to continue this with the -next > tree once it gets going. Having just pulled this tree i

Re: linux-next: first tree

2008-02-20 Thread Randy Dunlap
On Thu, 21 Feb 2008 01:23:32 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Andy, > > On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 16:04:36 + Andy Whitcroft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > As devout believers in testing things early we test -mm and -git releases > > as they drop. I am keen that we are able to continue this w

Re: linux-next: first tree

2008-02-21 Thread Frank Seidel
Randy Dunlap wrote: > I'd like to see tarballs too, please... Hi, i'll provide tars of the current linux-next tree reachable via my http://linux-next.f-seidel.de wiki ("Tar Downloads"). Is that what you were looking for? Thanks, Frank -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe l

Re: linux-next: first tree

2008-02-21 Thread Randy Dunlap
Frank Seidel wrote: Randy Dunlap wrote: I'd like to see tarballs too, please... Hi, i'll provide tars of the current linux-next tree reachable via my http://linux-next.f-seidel.de wiki ("Tar Downloads"). Is that what you were looking for? Looks close. It needs to be scriptable (not just a d

Re: linux-next: first tree

2008-02-21 Thread Greg KH
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 01:07:01AM +0100, Frank Seidel wrote: > Randy Dunlap wrote: > > I'd like to see tarballs too, please... > > Hi, i'll provide tars of the current linux-next tree reachable > via my http://linux-next.f-seidel.de wiki ("Tar Downloads"). > Is that what you were looking for? An

Re: linux-next: first tree

2008-02-21 Thread Harvey Harrison
On Thu, 2008-02-21 at 16:12 -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote: > Frank Seidel wrote: > > Randy Dunlap wrote: > >> I'd like to see tarballs too, please... > > > > Hi, i'll provide tars of the current linux-next tree reachable > > via my http://linux-next.f-seidel.de wiki ("Tar Downloads"). > > Is that what

Re: linux-next: first tree

2008-02-21 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Frank, On Fri, 22 Feb 2008 01:07:01 +0100 Frank Seidel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, i'll provide tars of the current linux-next tree reachable > via my http://linux-next.f-seidel.de wiki ("Tar Downloads"). > Is that what you were looking for? I was going to start providing tarballs yeste

Re: linux-next: first tree

2008-02-21 Thread Frank Seidel
Randy Dunlap wrote: > Looks close. It needs to be scriptable (not just a dynamically generated > link) and have predictable names. As long as those are true, then it > should be great. Yes, i would have scripted it when it tourned out to be of use for others. But as i just saw Stephen already ha

Re: linux-next: first tree

2008-02-21 Thread Frank Seidel
Greg KH wrote: > Any reason we can't get these on kernel.org so that the mirror system > will kick in for the whole world? Only that i don't have a kernel.org account ;-) But Stephen has and i suppose he'll put it there. Thanks, Frank -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe l

Re: linux-next: first tree

2008-02-21 Thread Frank Seidel
Hello Stephen, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > On Fri, 22 Feb 2008 01:07:01 +0100 Frank Seidel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hi, i'll provide tars of the current linux-next tree reachable >> via my http://linux-next.f-seidel.de wiki ("Tar Downloads"). >> Is that what you were looking for? > > I was goi

Re: linux-next: first tree

2008-02-21 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Frank, On Fri, 22 Feb 2008 06:41:00 +0100 Frank Seidel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > On Fri, 22 Feb 2008 01:07:01 +0100 Frank Seidel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Hi, i'll provide tars of the current linux-next tree reachable > >> via my http://linux-next.f-seidel