Re: linux-2.6.21-gitN - versioning question

2007-05-13 Thread Cyrill Gorcunov
[David Woodhouse - Sun, May 13, 2007 at 02:50:10PM +0800] | On Sun, 2007-05-13 at 10:43 +0400, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote: | > Btw David who does release a such snapshots (like git16)? You or | > Linus? | | I do. Not that I've actually had much involvement with it for a while -- | it's mostly done by

Re: linux-2.6.21-gitN - versioning question

2007-05-12 Thread David Woodhouse
On Sun, 2007-05-13 at 10:43 +0400, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote: > Btw David who does release a such snapshots (like git16)? You or > Linus? I do. Not that I've actually had much involvement with it for a while -- it's mostly done by cron and the script at http://david.woodhou.se/git-snapshot.sh -- dw

Re: linux-2.6.21-gitN - versioning question

2007-05-12 Thread Cyrill Gorcunov
[David Woodhouse - Sun, May 13, 2007 at 02:26:40PM +0800] | On Sat, 2007-05-12 at 17:01 +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote: | > On May 12 2007 21:44, David Woodhouse wrote: | > >On Sat, 2007-05-12 at 17:19 +0400, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote: | > >> Actually I think it would be convenient if such tags (like | >

Re: linux-2.6.21-gitN - versioning question

2007-05-12 Thread David Woodhouse
On Sat, 2007-05-12 at 17:01 +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote: > On May 12 2007 21:44, David Woodhouse wrote: > >On Sat, 2007-05-12 at 17:19 +0400, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote: > >> Actually I think it would be convenient if such tags (like > >> v.2.6.21-git16) were in Linus' git tree too. > > > >Then there wo

Re: linux-2.6.21-gitN - versioning question

2007-05-12 Thread H. Peter Anvin
David Woodhouse wrote: > On Sat, 2007-05-12 at 17:19 +0400, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote: >> Actually I think it would be convenient if such tags (like >> v.2.6.21-git16) were in Linus' git tree too. > > Then there would be _lots_ of tags in the master tree -- I'm not sure we > want that. > > I suppose

Re: linux-2.6.21-gitN - versioning question

2007-05-12 Thread Cyrill Gorcunov
[Russell King - Sat, May 12, 2007 at 05:31:41PM +0100] | On Sat, May 12, 2007 at 08:24:28PM +0400, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote: | > [Jan Engelhardt - Sat, May 12, 2007 at 05:01:19PM +0200] | > | | > | On May 12 2007 21:44, David Woodhouse wrote: | > | >On Sat, 2007-05-12 at 17:19 +0400, Cyrill Gorcunov

Re: linux-2.6.21-gitN - versioning question

2007-05-12 Thread Russell King
On Sat, May 12, 2007 at 08:24:28PM +0400, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote: > [Jan Engelhardt - Sat, May 12, 2007 at 05:01:19PM +0200] > | > | On May 12 2007 21:44, David Woodhouse wrote: > | >On Sat, 2007-05-12 at 17:19 +0400, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote: > | >> Actually I think it would be convenient if such tag

Re: linux-2.6.21-gitN - versioning question

2007-05-12 Thread Cyrill Gorcunov
[Jan Engelhardt - Sat, May 12, 2007 at 05:01:19PM +0200] | | On May 12 2007 21:44, David Woodhouse wrote: | >On Sat, 2007-05-12 at 17:19 +0400, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote: | >> Actually I think it would be convenient if such tags (like | >> v.2.6.21-git16) were in Linus' git tree too. | > | >Then there

Re: linux-2.6.21-gitN - versioning question

2007-05-12 Thread Cyrill Gorcunov
[Jan Engelhardt - Sat, May 12, 2007 at 05:01:19PM +0200] | | On May 12 2007 21:44, David Woodhouse wrote: | >On Sat, 2007-05-12 at 17:19 +0400, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote: | >> Actually I think it would be convenient if such tags (like | >> v.2.6.21-git16) were in Linus' git tree too. | > | >Then there

Re: linux-2.6.21-gitN - versioning question

2007-05-12 Thread Jan Engelhardt
On May 12 2007 21:44, David Woodhouse wrote: >On Sat, 2007-05-12 at 17:19 +0400, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote: >> Actually I think it would be convenient if such tags (like >> v.2.6.21-git16) were in Linus' git tree too. > >Then there would be _lots_ of tags in the master tree -- I'm not sure we >want th

Re: linux-2.6.21-gitN - versioning question

2007-05-12 Thread Cyrill Gorcunov
[David Woodhouse - Sat, May 12, 2007 at 09:44:56PM +0800] | On Sat, 2007-05-12 at 17:19 +0400, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote: | > Actually I think it would be convenient if such tags (like | > v.2.6.21-git16) were in Linus' git tree too. | | Then there would be _lots_ of tags in the master tree -- I'm not

Re: linux-2.6.21-gitN - versioning question

2007-05-12 Thread David Woodhouse
On Sat, 2007-05-12 at 17:19 +0400, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote: > Actually I think it would be convenient if such tags (like > v.2.6.21-git16) were in Linus' git tree too. Then there would be _lots_ of tags in the master tree -- I'm not sure we want that. I suppose I could put a tree on kernel.org whic

Re: linux-2.6.21-gitN - versioning question

2007-05-12 Thread Cyrill Gorcunov
[YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / ?$B5HF#1QL@ - Sat, May 12, 2007 at 09:03:08PM +0900] | In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Sat, 12 May 2007 13:19:23 +0200 (MEST)), Jan Engelhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says: | | > I notice that people refer to certain git snapshots as e.g. -git16; | > kernel.org does so too. H

Re: linux-2.6.21-gitN - versioning question

2007-05-12 Thread YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Sat, 12 May 2007 13:19:23 +0200 (MEST)), Jan Engelhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says: > I notice that people refer to certain git snapshots as e.g. -git16; > kernel.org does so too. Hovering over the link on kernel.org reveals > http://kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/

Re: linux-2.6.21-gitN - versioning question

2007-05-12 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Sat, May 12, 2007 at 01:19:23PM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote: > Hi list, > > > I notice that people refer to certain git snapshots as e.g. -git16; > kernel.org does so too. Hovering over the link on kernel.org reveals > http://kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/snapshots/patch-2.6.21-git16.bz2

linux-2.6.21-gitN - versioning question

2007-05-12 Thread Jan Engelhardt
Hi list, I notice that people refer to certain git snapshots as e.g. -git16; kernel.org does so too. Hovering over the link on kernel.org reveals http://kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/snapshots/patch-2.6.21-git16.bz2 but where do I actually find -git16 in Linus's git tree? git16 is neither a