Hi,
Sorry for the trouble. I have worked out what is going on.
I have been using Cygwin, but I has assumed incorrectly that MS WindowsXP
SP2, like MS Windows 2000, honered mixed case filenames correctly. This is
not the case making MS WindowsXP SP2 Pro non POSIX complient (what a
supprise)
On Fri, 25 Feb 2005, Mark Fortescue wrote:
> The kernel patch files patch-2.6.9 and patch-2.6.10 do not apear to be
> correct. I had some errors during patching so I generated a diff against a
> freshly downloaded linux-2.6.10 kernel. See the steps below:
>
> 1) bzcat linux-2.6.8.1.tar.bz2 | tar
On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 11:47:23AM -0500, Lee Revell wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-02-25 at 16:40 +, Mark Fortescue wrote:
> > The kernel patch files patch-2.6.9 and patch-2.6.10 do not apear to be
> > correct.
>
> No, you're doing it wrong. 2.6.8.1 was a bugfix release. The correct
> patching order
On Friday 25 February 2005 17:40, Mark Fortescue wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am not sure exactly where to send this email. A have chosen the
> ip4/ip6 networking as the issues are in this area of the kernel.
>
> The kernel patch files patch-2.6.9 and patch-2.6.10 do not apear to be
> correct. I had some
On Fri, 2005-02-25 at 16:40 +, Mark Fortescue wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am not sure exactly where to send this email. A have chosen the
> ip4/ip6 networking as the issues are in this area of the kernel.
>
> The kernel patch files patch-2.6.9 and patch-2.6.10 do not apear to be
> correct.
No, y
Hi all,
I am not sure exactly where to send this email. A have chosen the
ip4/ip6 networking as the issues are in this area of the kernel.
The kernel patch files patch-2.6.9 and patch-2.6.10 do not apear to be
correct. I had some errors during patching so I generated a diff against a
freshly dow
6 matches
Mail list logo
