Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commits in the s390 tree

Hi Stephen, On Sat, 3 Feb 2018 13:03:48 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Commits > > a39892ed47bf ("s390/runtime_instrumentation: re-add signum system call > parameter") > 279d2cea3aad ("s390/cio: fix kernel-doc usage") > > are missing a Signed-off-by from their

Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commits in the s390 tree

Hi Stephen, On Sat, 3 Feb 2018 13:03:48 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Commits > > a39892ed47bf ("s390/runtime_instrumentation: re-add signum system call > parameter") > 279d2cea3aad ("s390/cio: fix kernel-doc usage") > > are missing a Signed-off-by from their committer. Thanks for the

linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commits in the s390 tree

Hi all, Commits a39892ed47bf ("s390/runtime_instrumentation: re-add signum system call parameter") 279d2cea3aad ("s390/cio: fix kernel-doc usage") are missing a Signed-off-by from their committer. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell

linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commits in the s390 tree

Hi all, Commits a39892ed47bf ("s390/runtime_instrumentation: re-add signum system call parameter") 279d2cea3aad ("s390/cio: fix kernel-doc usage") are missing a Signed-off-by from their committer. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell