Hi all,
Changes since 20190424:
The rdma-fixes tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree.
The qcom tree lost its build failure.
The next-next tree lost its build failure.
The ipsec-next tree gained a conflict against the ipsec tree.
The drm tree gained a build failure due to a bad automatic
Hi all,
News: There will be no linux-next release tomorrow.
Changes since 20180424:
The qcom tree gained a build failure so I used the version from
next-20180424.
The clk-samsung tree gained a build failure so I used the version from
next-20180424.
The bpf-next tree gained conflicts against
Hi all,
News: There will be no linux-next release tomorrow.
Changes since 20180424:
The qcom tree gained a build failure so I used the version from
next-20180424.
The clk-samsung tree gained a build failure so I used the version from
next-20180424.
The bpf-next tree gained conflicts against
Hi Randy,
thanks for the report!
Some fallout of my namespace support integration %-)
I posted a patch for it:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-can=149323049630039=2
Many thanks & best regards,
Oliver
On 04/26/2017 04:53 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
On 04/26/17 01:03, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
Hi Randy,
thanks for the report!
Some fallout of my namespace support integration %-)
I posted a patch for it:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-can=149323049630039=2
Many thanks & best regards,
Oliver
On 04/26/2017 04:53 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
On 04/26/17 01:03, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
On 04/26/17 01:03, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Changes since 20170424:
>
on x86_64:
when CONFIG_PROC_FS is not enabled:
../net/can/bcm.c:1541:14: error: 'struct netns_can' has no member named
'bcmproc_dir'
../net/can/bcm.c:1601:14: error: 'struct netns_can' has no member named
On 04/26/17 01:03, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Changes since 20170424:
>
on x86_64:
when CONFIG_PROC_FS is not enabled:
../net/can/bcm.c:1541:14: error: 'struct netns_can' has no member named
'bcmproc_dir'
../net/can/bcm.c:1601:14: error: 'struct netns_can' has no member named
Hi all,
Changes since 20170424:
The net-next tree gained a conflict against the kbuild tree.
The tip tree lost its build failure and gained a conflict against the
powerpc tree.
The scsi-mkp tree gained a conflict against the block tree.
The nvdimm tree lost its build failure.
Non-merge
Hi all,
Changes since 20170424:
The net-next tree gained a conflict against the kbuild tree.
The tip tree lost its build failure and gained a conflict against the
powerpc tree.
The scsi-mkp tree gained a conflict against the block tree.
The nvdimm tree lost its build failure.
Non-merge
Hi all,
Changes since 20160422:
New tree: kbuild-pitre
The arm-soc tree gained a build failure so I used the version from
next-20160422.
The pci tree lost its build failure but gained another for which I
applied a merg fix patch.
The pm tree gained a conflict against the renesas tree.
The
Hi all,
Changes since 20160422:
New tree: kbuild-pitre
The arm-soc tree gained a build failure so I used the version from
next-20160422.
The pci tree lost its build failure but gained another for which I
applied a merg fix patch.
The pm tree gained a conflict against the renesas tree.
The
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 7:30 PM, Gustavo Padovan wrote:
> Hi Sedat,
>
> * Sedat Dilek [2013-04-26 19:40:20 +0200]:
>
>> On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 7:32 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
>> > On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 7:30 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
>> >> On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 10:03 AM, Stephen Rothwell
>> >>
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 7:30 PM, Gustavo Padovan gust...@padovan.org wrote:
Hi Sedat,
* Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com [2013-04-26 19:40:20 +0200]:
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 7:32 PM, Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 7:30 PM, Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com
Hi Sedat,
* Sedat Dilek [2013-04-26 19:40:20 +0200]:
> On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 7:32 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 7:30 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> >> On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 10:03 AM, Stephen Rothwell
> >> wrote:
> >>> Hi all,
> >>>
> >>> Changes since 20130424:
> >>>
>
Hi Sedat,
* Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com [2013-04-26 19:40:20 +0200]:
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 7:32 PM, Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 7:30 PM, Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 10:03 AM, Stephen Rothwell
On 29/04/13 09:53, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Apr 2013 09:11:13 +0100 Matt Fleming
> wrote:
>>
>> On 29/04/13 00:36, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>> Commit e29c2de5f591 ("Merge tag 'v3.9-rc8' into efi-for-tip") by Matt
>>> Fleming from the tip tree merged v3.9-rc8 (which has 0635eb8a54cf)
On Mon, 29 Apr 2013 09:11:13 +0100 Matt Fleming wrote:
>
> On 29/04/13 00:36, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Commit e29c2de5f591 ("Merge tag 'v3.9-rc8' into efi-for-tip") by Matt
> > Fleming from the tip tree merged v3.9-rc8 (which has 0635eb8a54cf) with
> > the branch that contains 048517722cde but
On 29/04/13 00:36, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Commit e29c2de5f591 ("Merge tag 'v3.9-rc8' into efi-for-tip") by Matt
> Fleming from the tip tree merged v3.9-rc8 (which has 0635eb8a54cf) with
> the branch that contains 048517722cde but lost the "select UCS2_STRING"
> which should be in
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 8:58 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven
wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 1:36 AM, Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
>> P.S. Geert, please trim your replies.
>
> Sorry, I noticed only after sending.
> (First time I wanted to reply without quoting anything using the new gmail
> web interface.
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 1:36 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> P.S. Geert, please trim your replies.
Sorry, I noticed only after sending.
(First time I wanted to reply without quoting anything using the new gmail
web interface. So it was not intuitive ;-)
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 1:36 AM, Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au wrote:
P.S. Geert, please trim your replies.
Sorry, I noticed only after sending.
(First time I wanted to reply without quoting anything using the new gmail
web interface. So it was not intuitive ;-)
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 8:58 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven
ge...@linux-m68k.org wrote:
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 1:36 AM, Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au
wrote:
P.S. Geert, please trim your replies.
Sorry, I noticed only after sending.
(First time I wanted to reply without quoting anything
On 29/04/13 00:36, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Commit e29c2de5f591 (Merge tag 'v3.9-rc8' into efi-for-tip) by Matt
Fleming from the tip tree merged v3.9-rc8 (which has 0635eb8a54cf) with
the branch that contains 048517722cde but lost the select UCS2_STRING
which should be in
On Mon, 29 Apr 2013 09:11:13 +0100 Matt Fleming matt.flem...@intel.com wrote:
On 29/04/13 00:36, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Commit e29c2de5f591 (Merge tag 'v3.9-rc8' into efi-for-tip) by Matt
Fleming from the tip tree merged v3.9-rc8 (which has 0635eb8a54cf) with
the branch that contains
On 29/04/13 09:53, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
On Mon, 29 Apr 2013 09:11:13 +0100 Matt Fleming matt.flem...@intel.com
wrote:
On 29/04/13 00:36, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Commit e29c2de5f591 (Merge tag 'v3.9-rc8' into efi-for-tip) by Matt
Fleming from the tip tree merged v3.9-rc8 (which has
Hi all,
On Sat, 27 Apr 2013 19:06:53 +0200 Geert Uytterhoeven
wrote:
>
> ia64-defconfig:
>
> (.text+0x3956a2): undefined reference to `ucs2_strsize'
> (.text+0x395f82): undefined reference to `ucs2_strsize'
> (.text+0x395fa2): undefined reference to `ucs2_strsize'
> (.text+0x396222): undefined
Hi all,
On Sat, 27 Apr 2013 19:06:53 +0200 Geert Uytterhoeven ge...@linux-m68k.org
wrote:
ia64-defconfig:
(.text+0x3956a2): undefined reference to `ucs2_strsize'
(.text+0x395f82): undefined reference to `ucs2_strsize'
(.text+0x395fa2): undefined reference to `ucs2_strsize'
Sedat, All,
On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 01:30:33PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 8:54 AM, Michal Marek wrote:
> > That (silent)oldconfig with stdin redirection throws an error if it
> > encounters a new option is expected and correct. The bug here is that
> > _normal_ oldconfig
Michal, All,
On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 08:54:37AM +0200, Michal Marek wrote:
> That (silent)oldconfig with stdin redirection throws an error if it
> encounters a new option is expected and correct. The bug here is that
> _normal_ oldconfig run apparently does not set all the options. I.e.
>
> $
On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 8:54 AM, Michal Marek wrote:
> Dne 27.4.2013 00:01, Yann E. MORIN napsal(a):
>> Michal, Sedat, All,
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 01:13:33PM +0200, Michal Marek wrote:
>>> On 26.4.2013 13:08, Michal Marek wrote:
On 26.4.2013 12:49, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> With
Dne 27.4.2013 00:01, Yann E. MORIN napsal(a):
> Michal, Sedat, All,
>
> On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 01:13:33PM +0200, Michal Marek wrote:
>> On 26.4.2013 13:08, Michal Marek wrote:
>>> On 26.4.2013 12:49, Sedat Dilek wrote:
With reverting all kbuild-next commits I was able to build again.
Dne 27.4.2013 00:01, Yann E. MORIN napsal(a):
Michal, Sedat, All,
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 01:13:33PM +0200, Michal Marek wrote:
On 26.4.2013 13:08, Michal Marek wrote:
On 26.4.2013 12:49, Sedat Dilek wrote:
With reverting all kbuild-next commits I was able to build again.
Revert
On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 8:54 AM, Michal Marek mma...@suse.cz wrote:
Dne 27.4.2013 00:01, Yann E. MORIN napsal(a):
Michal, Sedat, All,
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 01:13:33PM +0200, Michal Marek wrote:
On 26.4.2013 13:08, Michal Marek wrote:
On 26.4.2013 12:49, Sedat Dilek wrote:
With reverting
Michal, All,
On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 08:54:37AM +0200, Michal Marek wrote:
That (silent)oldconfig with stdin redirection throws an error if it
encounters a new option is expected and correct. The bug here is that
_normal_ oldconfig run apparently does not set all the options. I.e.
$ yes |
Sedat, All,
On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 01:30:33PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote:
On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 8:54 AM, Michal Marek mma...@suse.cz wrote:
That (silent)oldconfig with stdin redirection throws an error if it
encounters a new option is expected and correct. The bug here is that
_normal_
On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 12:04 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 11:07:44PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote:
>> > The second argument %rsi is zero, which got transferred to %r13 and
>> > then offset deref on it trapped.
>> >
>> > The second argument is @wq and the oopsing code is the
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 11:07:44PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> > The second argument %rsi is zero, which got transferred to %r13 and
> > then offset deref on it trapped.
> >
> > The second argument is @wq and the oopsing code is the wq->flags deref
> > in the following if condition.
> >
> >
Michal, Sedat, All,
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 01:13:33PM +0200, Michal Marek wrote:
> On 26.4.2013 13:08, Michal Marek wrote:
> > On 26.4.2013 12:49, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> >> With reverting all kbuild-next commits I was able to build again.
> >>
> >> Revert "kconfig: implement
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 8:22 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 07:40:20PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote:
>> Oops, NULL-pointer-deref [ __queue_work() ]
>>
>> [ 25.974932] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference
>> at 0100
>> [ 25.974944] IP: []
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 8:43 PM, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> 2013/4/26 Sedat Dilek :
>> On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 8:22 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
>>> On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 07:40:20PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote:
Oops, NULL-pointer-deref [ __queue_work() ]
[ 25.974932] BUG: unable to
2013/4/26 Sedat Dilek :
> On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 8:22 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 07:40:20PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote:
>>> Oops, NULL-pointer-deref [ __queue_work() ]
>>>
>>> [ 25.974932] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference
>>> at 0100
>>> [
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 07:40:20PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> Oops, NULL-pointer-deref [ __queue_work() ]
>
> [ 25.974932] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference
> at 0100
> [ 25.974944] IP: [] __queue_work+0x32/0x3d0
So, 0x100 deref near the top of the function.
Hi Randy,
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Changes since 20130424:
>>
>
>
> on i386:
>
> net/built-in.o: In function `nfc_unregister_device':
> (.text+0x6a36d): undefined reference to `rfkill_unregister'
> net/built-in.o: In function `nfc_unregister_device':
> (.text+0x6a378): undefined reference to
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 7:32 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 7:30 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 10:03 AM, Stephen Rothwell
>> wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Changes since 20130424:
>>>
>>> Removed tree: ppc-temp (remerged into powerpc)
>>>
>>> The net-next tree
On 04/26/13 01:03, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Changes since 20130424:
>
on i386:
net/built-in.o: In function `nfc_unregister_device':
(.text+0x6a36d): undefined reference to `rfkill_unregister'
net/built-in.o: In function `nfc_unregister_device':
(.text+0x6a378): undefined
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 10:03 AM, Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Changes since 20130424:
>
> Removed tree: ppc-temp (remerged into powerpc)
>
> The net-next tree gained conflicts against the net and pci trees and a
> build failure for which I applied a merge fix patch.
>
> The omap_dss2
Michal, Sedat, All,
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 01:08:35PM +0200, Michal Marek wrote:
> On 26.4.2013 12:49, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 12:37 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> >> On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 12:35 PM, Sedat Dilek
> >> wrote:
> >>> On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 12:04 PM, Michal
On 26.4.2013 13:45, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 1:23 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 1:13 PM, Michal Marek wrote:
>>> On 26.4.2013 13:08, Michal Marek wrote:
On 26.4.2013 12:49, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> With reverting all kbuild-next commits I was able to
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 1:23 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 1:13 PM, Michal Marek wrote:
>> On 26.4.2013 13:08, Michal Marek wrote:
>>> On 26.4.2013 12:49, Sedat Dilek wrote:
With reverting all kbuild-next commits I was able to build again.
Revert "kconfig:
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 1:13 PM, Michal Marek wrote:
> On 26.4.2013 13:08, Michal Marek wrote:
>> On 26.4.2013 12:49, Sedat Dilek wrote:
>>> With reverting all kbuild-next commits I was able to build again.
>>>
>>> Revert "kconfig: implement KCONFIG_PROBABILITY for randconfig"
>>>
On 26.4.2013 13:08, Michal Marek wrote:
> On 26.4.2013 12:49, Sedat Dilek wrote:
>> With reverting all kbuild-next commits I was able to build again.
>>
>> Revert "kconfig: implement KCONFIG_PROBABILITY for randconfig"
>> Revert "kconfig: allow specifying the seed for randconfig"
>>
On 26.4.2013 12:49, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 12:37 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 12:35 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
>>> On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 12:04 PM, Michal Marek wrote:
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 11:58:25AM +0200, Michal Marek wrote:
> Can you send a
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 12:37 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 12:35 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 12:04 PM, Michal Marek wrote:
>>> On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 11:58:25AM +0200, Michal Marek wrote:
Can you send a copy of your .config?
>>>
>>> I can
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 12:35 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 12:04 PM, Michal Marek wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 11:58:25AM +0200, Michal Marek wrote:
>>> Can you send a copy of your .config?
>>
>> I can reproduce it as well:
>>
>> $ yes "" | make oldconfig
>> ...
>>
Added Yann, from whom I merged couple of kconfig changes yesterday.
On 26.4.2013 11:42, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> [ CC linux-kbuild folks ]
>
> I am always doing a ...
>
>$ cd linux-next/
>
>$ yes "" | make oldconfig
>
> ... before starting a kernel-build.
>
> Today, I see this ...
>
> $
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 11:42 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 10:03 AM, Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Changes since 20130424:
>>
>> Removed tree: ppc-temp (remerged into powerpc)
>>
>> The net-next tree gained conflicts against the net and pci trees and a
>> build
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 10:03 AM, Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Changes since 20130424:
>
> Removed tree: ppc-temp (remerged into powerpc)
>
> The net-next tree gained conflicts against the net and pci trees and a
> build failure for which I applied a merge fix patch.
>
> The omap_dss2
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 10:03 AM, Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au
wrote:
Hi all,
Changes since 20130424:
Removed tree: ppc-temp (remerged into powerpc)
The net-next tree gained conflicts against the net and pci trees and a
build failure for which I applied a merge fix patch.
The
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 11:42 AM, Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 10:03 AM, Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au
wrote:
Hi all,
Changes since 20130424:
Removed tree: ppc-temp (remerged into powerpc)
The net-next tree gained conflicts against the net and
Added Yann, from whom I merged couple of kconfig changes yesterday.
On 26.4.2013 11:42, Sedat Dilek wrote:
[ CC linux-kbuild folks ]
I am always doing a ...
$ cd linux-next/
$ yes | make oldconfig
... before starting a kernel-build.
Today, I see this ...
$
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 12:35 PM, Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 12:04 PM, Michal Marek mma...@suse.cz wrote:
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 11:58:25AM +0200, Michal Marek wrote:
Can you send a copy of your .config?
I can reproduce it as well:
$ yes | make
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 12:37 PM, Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 12:35 PM, Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 12:04 PM, Michal Marek mma...@suse.cz wrote:
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 11:58:25AM +0200, Michal Marek wrote:
Can you send
On 26.4.2013 12:49, Sedat Dilek wrote:
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 12:37 PM, Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 12:35 PM, Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 12:04 PM, Michal Marek mma...@suse.cz wrote:
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 11:58:25AM
On 26.4.2013 13:08, Michal Marek wrote:
On 26.4.2013 12:49, Sedat Dilek wrote:
With reverting all kbuild-next commits I was able to build again.
Revert kconfig: implement KCONFIG_PROBABILITY for randconfig
Revert kconfig: allow specifying the seed for randconfig
Revert
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 1:13 PM, Michal Marek mma...@suse.cz wrote:
On 26.4.2013 13:08, Michal Marek wrote:
On 26.4.2013 12:49, Sedat Dilek wrote:
With reverting all kbuild-next commits I was able to build again.
Revert kconfig: implement KCONFIG_PROBABILITY for randconfig
Revert
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 1:23 PM, Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 1:13 PM, Michal Marek mma...@suse.cz wrote:
On 26.4.2013 13:08, Michal Marek wrote:
On 26.4.2013 12:49, Sedat Dilek wrote:
With reverting all kbuild-next commits I was able to build again.
On 26.4.2013 13:45, Sedat Dilek wrote:
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 1:23 PM, Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 1:13 PM, Michal Marek mma...@suse.cz wrote:
On 26.4.2013 13:08, Michal Marek wrote:
On 26.4.2013 12:49, Sedat Dilek wrote:
With reverting all kbuild-next
Michal, Sedat, All,
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 01:08:35PM +0200, Michal Marek wrote:
On 26.4.2013 12:49, Sedat Dilek wrote:
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 12:37 PM, Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 12:35 PM, Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, Apr 26,
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 10:03 AM, Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au
wrote:
Hi all,
Changes since 20130424:
Removed tree: ppc-temp (remerged into powerpc)
The net-next tree gained conflicts against the net and pci trees and a
build failure for which I applied a merge fix patch.
The
On 04/26/13 01:03, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
Changes since 20130424:
on i386:
net/built-in.o: In function `nfc_unregister_device':
(.text+0x6a36d): undefined reference to `rfkill_unregister'
net/built-in.o: In function `nfc_unregister_device':
(.text+0x6a378): undefined reference to
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 7:32 PM, Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 7:30 PM, Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 10:03 AM, Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au
wrote:
Hi all,
Changes since 20130424:
Removed tree: ppc-temp
Hi Randy,
Hi all,
Changes since 20130424:
on i386:
net/built-in.o: In function `nfc_unregister_device':
(.text+0x6a36d): undefined reference to `rfkill_unregister'
net/built-in.o: In function `nfc_unregister_device':
(.text+0x6a378): undefined reference to `rfkill_destroy'
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 07:40:20PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote:
Oops, NULL-pointer-deref [ __queue_work() ]
[ 25.974932] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference
at 0100
[ 25.974944] IP: [81077502] __queue_work+0x32/0x3d0
So, 0x100 deref near the top of the
2013/4/26 Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com:
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 8:22 PM, Tejun Heo t...@kernel.org wrote:
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 07:40:20PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote:
Oops, NULL-pointer-deref [ __queue_work() ]
[ 25.974932] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference
at
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 8:43 PM, Frederic Weisbecker fweis...@gmail.com wrote:
2013/4/26 Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com:
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 8:22 PM, Tejun Heo t...@kernel.org wrote:
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 07:40:20PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote:
Oops, NULL-pointer-deref [ __queue_work() ]
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 8:22 PM, Tejun Heo t...@kernel.org wrote:
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 07:40:20PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote:
Oops, NULL-pointer-deref [ __queue_work() ]
[ 25.974932] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference
at 0100
[ 25.974944] IP:
Michal, Sedat, All,
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 01:13:33PM +0200, Michal Marek wrote:
On 26.4.2013 13:08, Michal Marek wrote:
On 26.4.2013 12:49, Sedat Dilek wrote:
With reverting all kbuild-next commits I was able to build again.
Revert kconfig: implement KCONFIG_PROBABILITY for
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 11:07:44PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote:
The second argument %rsi is zero, which got transferred to %r13 and
then offset deref on it trapped.
The second argument is @wq and the oopsing code is the wq-flags deref
in the following if condition.
/* if dying,
On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 12:04 AM, Tejun Heo t...@kernel.org wrote:
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 11:07:44PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote:
The second argument %rsi is zero, which got transferred to %r13 and
then offset deref on it trapped.
The second argument is @wq and the oopsing code is the
79 matches
Mail list logo
