Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 28

2020-04-28 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, On Tue, 28 Apr 2020 18:34:35 -0700 Nathan Chancellor wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 06:24:21PM -0700, Minchan Kim wrote: > > > > On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 12:04:59PM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote: > > > > > > I am seeing the following build error on s390 defconfig, caused by > > >

Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 28

2020-04-28 Thread Nathan Chancellor
On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 06:24:21PM -0700, Minchan Kim wrote: > Hello, > > On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 12:04:59PM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 06:10:06PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > Changes since 20200424: > > > > > > The qcom tree still had

Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 28

2020-04-28 Thread Minchan Kim
Hello, On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 12:04:59PM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote: > On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 06:10:06PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Changes since 20200424: > > > > The qcom tree still had its build failure for which I reverted a commit. > > > > The hwmon-staging tr

Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 28

2020-04-28 Thread Nathan Chancellor
On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 06:10:06PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20200424: > > The qcom tree still had its build failure for which I reverted a commit. > > The hwmon-staging tree gained a build failure for which I reverted > a commit. > > The mac80211-next tree gain

linux-next: Tree for Apr 28

2020-04-28 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20200424: The qcom tree still had its build failure for which I reverted a commit. The hwmon-staging tree gained a build failure for which I reverted a commit. The mac80211-next tree gained a build failure so I used the version from next-20200424. The drm-misc tree still

Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 28 (of/unittest)

2017-04-28 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 04/28/17 00:11, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20170427: > on i386: when CONFIG_OF_OVERLAY is not enabled: drivers/built-in.o: In function `unflatten_device_tree': (.init.text+0x1209f): undefined reference to `unittest_unflatten_overlay_base' -- ~Randy

linux-next: Tree for Apr 28

2017-04-28 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20170427: The kvm-ppc tree gained a build failure due to an interaction wuth the powerpc tree for which I added a merge fix patch. Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 11826 10826 files changed, 1207085 insertions(+), 223109 deletions(-) --

linux-next: Tree for Apr 28

2016-04-27 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20160427: The drm tree gained a build failure for which I applied a merge fix patch. The tpmdd tree gained a build failure for which I added a fix patch. Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 6405 5791 files changed, 243537 insertions(+), 120066 deletions(-) -

linux-next: Tree for Apr 28

2015-04-27 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20150427: New tree: dmi Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 725 874 files changed, 61499 insertions(+), 14685 deletions(-) I have created today's linux-next tree at git://git.kernel.org

Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 28 (drivers/pnp/quirks.c)

2014-04-28 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Monday, April 28, 2014 04:09:28 PM Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 11:14:15PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On 4/28/2014 11:11 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > >On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 10:45:37AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > >>On 04/27/14 23:57, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > >>>

Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 28 (drivers/pnp/quirks.c)

2014-04-28 Thread Bjorn Helgaas
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 11:14:15PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On 4/28/2014 11:11 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > >On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 10:45:37AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > >>On 04/27/14 23:57, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > >>>Hi all, > >>> > >>>This tree still fails (more than usual) the powerp

Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 28 (drivers/pnp/quirks.c)

2014-04-28 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On 4/28/2014 11:11 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 10:45:37AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: On 04/27/14 23:57, Stephen Rothwell wrote: Hi all, This tree still fails (more than usual) the powerpc allyesconfig build. Changes since 20140424: on i386: CC drivers/pnp/quirk

Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 28 (drivers/pnp/quirks.c)

2014-04-28 Thread Bjorn Helgaas
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 10:45:37AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 04/27/14 23:57, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > This tree still fails (more than usual) the powerpc allyesconfig build. > > > > Changes since 20140424: > > > > on i386: > > CC drivers/pnp/quirks.o > drivers/p

linux-next: Tree for Apr 28

2014-04-27 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, This tree still fails (more than usual) the powerpc allyesconfig build. Changes since 20140424: The mvebu tree gained a conflict against the arm tree. The powerpc tree still had its build failure. The libata tree lost its build failure. The net-next tree gained conflicts against the n