Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 30 (objtool warnings)

2020-04-30 Thread Josh Poimboeuf
On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 07:40:52AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 4/30/20 7:31 AM, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > On 4/30/20 12:40 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > >> Hi all, > >> > >> Changes since 20200429: > >> > > > > on x86_64: > > > > kernel/exit.o: warning: objtool: __x64_sys_exit_group()+0x2e: unr

Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 30 (objtool warnings)

2020-04-30 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 4/30/20 7:31 AM, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 4/30/20 12:40 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Changes since 20200429: >> > > on x86_64: > > kernel/exit.o: warning: objtool: __x64_sys_exit_group()+0x2e: unreachable > instruction > kernel/cred.o: warning: objtool: copy_creds()+0x278: unr

Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 30 (objtool warnings)

2020-04-30 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 4/30/20 12:40 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20200429: > on x86_64: kernel/exit.o: warning: objtool: __x64_sys_exit_group()+0x2e: unreachable instruction kernel/cred.o: warning: objtool: copy_creds()+0x278: unreachable instruction net/core/skbuff.o: warning: objtool

linux-next: Tree for Apr 30

2020-04-30 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20200429: Removed tree: smack (at maintainer's request) The qcom tree still had its build failure for which I reverted a commit. The mac80211-next tree lost its build failure. The drm-misc tree lost its build failure. The driver-core tree gained a conflict against the dr

linux-next: Tree for Apr 30

2019-04-30 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20190429: The rdma-fixes tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree. The imx-mxs tree gained a conflict against the arm-soc tree. The mlx5-next tree gained a conflict against the rdma tree. The wireless-drivers-next tree gained a conflict against the wireless-drivers tree

Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 30 (pinctrl/actions/pinctrl-owl)

2018-04-30 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 04/29/2018 09:58 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20180426: > on x86_64: WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for PINCTRL_OWL Depends on [n]: PINCTRL [=y] && (ARCH_ACTIONS || COMPILE_TEST [=n]) && OF [=n] Selected by [y]: - PINCTRL_S900 [=y] && PINCTRL [=y

linux-next: Tree for Apr 30

2018-04-29 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20180426: The qcom tree lost its build failure. The clk-samsung tree lost its build failure. The net-next tree gained a conflict against the net tree. The ipsec-next tree gained a conflict against the net-next tree. The rpmsg tree lost its build failure. Non-merge commi

linux-next: Tree for Apr 30

2015-04-29 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20150429: The sound-asoc tree gained a build failure so I used the version from next-20150429. The akpm-current tree gained a conflict against the livepatching tree. Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 1107 1110 files changed, 73625 insertions(+), 20304 deletions

linux-next: Tree for Apr 30

2014-04-29 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, This tree still fails (more than usual) the powerpc allyesconfig build. Changes since 20140429: The powerpc tree still had its build failure. The drm-intel tree gained a conflict against the drm-intel-fixes tree. The mfd-lj tree still had its build failure so I used the version from ne

Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 30 (netdev: mellanox/mlx4)

2013-04-30 Thread Eric Dumazet
On Tue, 2013-04-30 at 13:39 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > Yes, that fixes it. Thanks. > > Acked-by: Randy Dunlap > Thanks, I'll send the official patch in a couple of minutes. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vge

Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 30 (netdev: mellanox/mlx4)

2013-04-30 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 04/30/13 12:36, Eric Dumazet wrote: > On Tue, 2013-04-30 at 11:58 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: >> On 04/29/13 23:57, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Please do not add any v3.11 destined work to your linux-next included >>> branches until after v3.10-rc1 is released. >>> >>> Changes sin

Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 30 (netdev: mellanox/mlx4)

2013-04-30 Thread Eric Dumazet
On Tue, 2013-04-30 at 11:58 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 04/29/13 23:57, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Please do not add any v3.11 destined work to your linux-next included > > branches until after v3.10-rc1 is released. > > > > Changes since 20130429: > > > > on i386: > > ERR

Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 30 (netdev: mellanox/mlx4)

2013-04-30 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 04/29/13 23:57, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Please do not add any v3.11 destined work to your linux-next included > branches until after v3.10-rc1 is released. > > Changes since 20130429: > on i386: ERROR: "__udivdi3" [drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/mlx4_en.ko] undefined! --

Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 30 (sound)

2013-04-30 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 04/29/13 23:57, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Please do not add any v3.11 destined work to your linux-next included > branches until after v3.10-rc1 is released. > > Changes since 20130429: > when CONFIG_PROC_FS is not enabled: sound/core/memalloc.c: In function 'snd_mem_exit': sou