On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 02:14:32PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On Mon, 7 Sep 2020 10:55:47 +0200 Anders Roxell
> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 3 Sep 2020 at 18:14, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Sep 03, 2020 at 10:39:10AM +0200, Anders Roxell wrote:
> > > > Hi Paul,
>
Hi all,
On Mon, 7 Sep 2020 10:55:47 +0200 Anders Roxell
wrote:
>
> On Thu, 3 Sep 2020 at 18:14, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 03, 2020 at 10:39:10AM +0200, Anders Roxell wrote:
> > > Hi Paul,
> > >
> > > On Sat, 29 Aug 2020 at 00:59, Paul E. McKenney
> > > wrote:
> > > >
>
On Thu, 3 Sep 2020 at 18:14, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 03, 2020 at 10:39:10AM +0200, Anders Roxell wrote:
> > Hi Paul,
> >
> > On Sat, 29 Aug 2020 at 00:59, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 09:24:19PM +0200, Anders Roxell wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 28 Aug
On Thu, Sep 03, 2020 at 10:39:10AM +0200, Anders Roxell wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> On Sat, 29 Aug 2020 at 00:59, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 09:24:19PM +0200, Anders Roxell wrote:
> > > On Fri, 28 Aug 2020 at 15:29, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Aug 28,
Hi Paul,
On Sat, 29 Aug 2020 at 00:59, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>
> On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 09:24:19PM +0200, Anders Roxell wrote:
> > On Fri, 28 Aug 2020 at 15:29, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 09:37:17AM +0200, Anders Roxell wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 26 Aug 2020 at
On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 09:24:19PM +0200, Anders Roxell wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Aug 2020 at 15:29, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 09:37:17AM +0200, Anders Roxell wrote:
> > > On Wed, 26 Aug 2020 at 21:39, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at
On Fri, 28 Aug 2020 at 15:29, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>
> On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 09:37:17AM +0200, Anders Roxell wrote:
> > On Wed, 26 Aug 2020 at 21:39, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 08:19:01PM +0200, Anders Roxell wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 26 Aug 2020 at 08:33,
On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 09:37:17AM +0200, Anders Roxell wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Aug 2020 at 21:39, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 08:19:01PM +0200, Anders Roxell wrote:
> > > On Wed, 26 Aug 2020 at 08:33, Stephen Rothwell
> > > wrote:
> >
> > [ . . . ]
> >
> > > I've built
On Wed, 26 Aug 2020 at 21:39, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 08:19:01PM +0200, Anders Roxell wrote:
> > On Wed, 26 Aug 2020 at 08:33, Stephen Rothwell
> > wrote:
>
> [ . . . ]
>
> > I've built and run an arm64 allmodconfig kernel where I use the
> > defconfig as the base, I
On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 08:19:01PM +0200, Anders Roxell wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Aug 2020 at 08:33, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
[ . . . ]
> I've built and run an arm64 allmodconfig kernel where I use the
> defconfig as the base, I do this for testing purposes.
> I can see the following call trace [1]:
>
On Wed, 26 Aug 2020 at 08:33, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> News: There will be no linux-next releases next Monday or Tuesday.
>
> Changes since 20200825:
>
> The bpf-next tree lost its build failure.
>
> The drm-misc tree gained conflicts against Linus' tree and the amdgpu
> tree. It
Hi all,
News: There will be no linux-next releases next Monday or Tuesday.
Changes since 20200825:
The bpf-next tree lost its build failure.
The drm-misc tree gained conflicts against Linus' tree and the amdgpu
tree. It also gained a semantic conflict against the drm-misc-fixes tree.
Hi all,
Changes since 20190823:
The mips tree gained a conflict against the kbuild tree.
The net-next tree gained a conflict against the net tree.
The drm tree gained conflicts against Linus' and the drm-misc-fixes trees.
The clockevents tree gained a conflict against the tip tree.
The
Hi all,
Changes since 20150825:
The nfs tree lost its build failure.
The i2c tree still had its build failure so I applied a supplied patch.
The mmc-uh tree gained a build failure so I used the version from
next-20150825.
The tty tree still had its build failure for which I reverted part of
a
Hi all,
Changes since 20150825:
The nfs tree lost its build failure.
The i2c tree still had its build failure so I applied a supplied patch.
The mmc-uh tree gained a build failure so I used the version from
next-20150825.
The tty tree still had its build failure for which I reverted part of
a
On 08/26/14 14:07, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 08/26/14 13:19, Stephan Mueller wrote:
>> Am Dienstag, 26. August 2014, 12:03:31 schrieb Randy Dunlap:
>>
>> Hi Randy,
>>
>>> On 08/26/14 00:34, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
Changes since 20140825:
The net tree gained a build
On 08/26/14 14:07, Randy Dunlap wrote:
On 08/26/14 13:19, Stephan Mueller wrote:
Am Dienstag, 26. August 2014, 12:03:31 schrieb Randy Dunlap:
Hi Randy,
On 08/26/14 00:34, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
Changes since 20140825:
The net tree gained a build failure for which I reverted a
On 08/26/14 13:19, Stephan Mueller wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 26. August 2014, 12:03:31 schrieb Randy Dunlap:
>
> Hi Randy,
>
>> On 08/26/14 00:34, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Changes since 20140825:
>>>
>>> The net tree gained a build failure for which I reverted a commit.
>>>
>>>
Am Dienstag, 26. August 2014, 12:03:31 schrieb Randy Dunlap:
Hi Randy,
> On 08/26/14 00:34, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Changes since 20140825:
> >
> > The net tree gained a build failure for which I reverted a commit.
> >
> > The mfd tree still had its build failure so I used
On 08/26/14 00:34, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Changes since 20140825:
>
> The net tree gained a build failure for which I reverted a commit.
>
> The mfd tree still had its build failure so I used the version from
> next-20140822.
>
on i386:
../include/crypto/drbg.h:157:2: warning:
Hi all,
Changes since 20140825:
The net tree gained a build failure for which I reverted a commit.
The mfd tree still had its build failure so I used the version from
next-20140822.
The trivial tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree.
The staging tree still had its build failure for which
Hi all,
Changes since 20140825:
The net tree gained a build failure for which I reverted a commit.
The mfd tree still had its build failure so I used the version from
next-20140822.
The trivial tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree.
The staging tree still had its build failure for which
On 08/26/14 00:34, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
Changes since 20140825:
The net tree gained a build failure for which I reverted a commit.
The mfd tree still had its build failure so I used the version from
next-20140822.
on i386:
../include/crypto/drbg.h:157:2: warning: left
Am Dienstag, 26. August 2014, 12:03:31 schrieb Randy Dunlap:
Hi Randy,
On 08/26/14 00:34, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
Changes since 20140825:
The net tree gained a build failure for which I reverted a commit.
The mfd tree still had its build failure so I used the version
On 08/26/14 13:19, Stephan Mueller wrote:
Am Dienstag, 26. August 2014, 12:03:31 schrieb Randy Dunlap:
Hi Randy,
On 08/26/14 00:34, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
Changes since 20140825:
The net tree gained a build failure for which I reverted a commit.
The mfd tree still had its
25 matches
Mail list logo
