Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 30

2019-09-02 Thread Guenter Roeck
On 9/2/19 12:55 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: On Sun, Sep 01, 2019 at 11:22:26AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: On Sat, Aug 31, 2019 at 12:36:13AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: Hi all, Changes since 20190829: The compiler-attributes tree gained a build failure for which I reverted a commit. The

Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 30

2019-09-02 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Sun, Sep 01, 2019 at 11:22:26AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On Sat, Aug 31, 2019 at 12:36:13AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Changes since 20190829: > > > > The compiler-attributes tree gained a build failure for which I reverted > > a commit. > > > > The arm-soc tree g

Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 30

2019-09-01 Thread Guenter Roeck
On Sat, Aug 31, 2019 at 12:36:13AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20190829: > > The compiler-attributes tree gained a build failure for which I reverted > a commit. > > The arm-soc tree gained a conflict against the arm tree. > > The csky tree gained a conflict again

Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 30 (exfat)

2019-08-30 Thread Valdis Klētnieks
On Fri, 30 Aug 2019 09:52:15 -0700, Randy Dunlap said: > on x86_64: > when CONFIG_VFAT_FS is not set/enabled: > > ../drivers/staging/exfat/exfat_super.c:46:41: error: > �CONFIG_FAT_DEFAULT_IOCHARSET� undeclared here (not in a function); did you > mean �CONFIG_EXFAT_DEFAULT_IOCHARSET�? Thanks.

Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 30 (exfat)

2019-08-30 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 8/30/19 7:36 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20190829: > on x86_64: when CONFIG_VFAT_FS is not set/enabled: ../drivers/staging/exfat/exfat_super.c:46:41: error: ‘CONFIG_FAT_DEFAULT_IOCHARSET’ undeclared here (not in a function); did you mean ‘CONFIG_EXFAT_DEFAULT_IO

linux-next: Tree for Aug 30

2019-08-30 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20190829: The compiler-attributes tree gained a build failure for which I reverted a commit. The arm-soc tree gained a conflict against the arm tree. The csky tree gained a conflict against the dma-mapping tree. The fuse tree gained a conflict against the fsverity tree.

linux-next: Tree for Aug 30

2018-08-29 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20180829: New trees: soundwire and soundwire-fixes Dropped trees: xarray, ida (temporarily) The spi tree lost its build failure. Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 1087 1284 files changed, 44936 insertions(+), 12978 deletions(-) ---

Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 30 (nouveau)

2013-09-06 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 08/30/13 12:59, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 08/29/13 03:00, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >> Hi all, >> > > > on x86_64: > > ERROR: "nouveau_switcheroo_optimus_dsm" [drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau.ko] > undefined! > > > Full randconfig file is attached. > > This build error still happens in lin

Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 30 (brcmfmac)

2013-09-01 Thread Arend van Spriel
On 08/31/13 20:40, Hauke Mehrtens wrote: On 08/31/2013 08:21 PM, Arend van Spriel wrote: On 08/31/13 19:37, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 11:12 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote: This bool kconfig symbol: config BRCMFMAC_SDIO bool "SDIO bus interface support for FullMAC dri

Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 30 (brcmfmac)

2013-08-31 Thread Hauke Mehrtens
On 08/31/2013 08:21 PM, Arend van Spriel wrote: > On 08/31/13 19:37, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: >> On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 11:12 PM, Randy Dunlap >> wrote: >>> This bool kconfig symbol: >>> >>> config BRCMFMAC_SDIO >>> bool "SDIO bus interface support for FullMAC driver" >>> depen

Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 30 (brcmfmac)

2013-08-31 Thread Arend van Spriel
On 08/31/13 19:37, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 11:12 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote: This bool kconfig symbol: config BRCMFMAC_SDIO bool "SDIO bus interface support for FullMAC driver" depends on MMC allows BRCMFMAC_SDIO to be y even when MMC=m. Is there a rea

Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 30 (brcmfmac)

2013-08-31 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 11:12 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote: > This bool kconfig symbol: > > config BRCMFMAC_SDIO > bool "SDIO bus interface support for FullMAC driver" > depends on MMC > > allows BRCMFMAC_SDIO to be y even when MMC=m. > > Is there a reasonable solution to this? In order

linux-next: Tree for Aug 30

2013-08-30 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Sorry for the late announcement - I wrote a draft and then forgot to send it. Changes since 20130829: The sound tree gained a conflict against the drm tree. The driver-core tree gained a conflict against the pm tree. The dma-mapping tree gained a conflict against the kvm-ppc tree. The

Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 30 (brcmfmac)

2013-08-30 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 08/29/13 03:00, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > on x86_64: when CONFIG_MMC=m CONFIG_BRCMUTIL=y CONFIG_BRCMFMAC=y CONFIG_BRCMFMAC_SDIO=y This bool kconfig symbol: config BRCMFMAC_SDIO bool "SDIO bus interface support for FullMAC driver" depends on MMC allows BRCMFMAC_SD