Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 7 (mm/khugepaged.c)

2019-08-07 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Song, On Wed, 7 Aug 2019 22:11:28 + Song Liu wrote: > > From: Song Liu > Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2019 14:57:38 -0700 > Subject: [PATCH] khugepaged: fix build without CONFIG_SHMEM > > khugepaged_scan_file() should be fully bypassed without CONFIG_SHMEM. > > Fixes: f57286140d96 ("mm,thp: add

Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 7 (mm/khugepaged.c)

2019-08-07 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Andrew, On Wed, 7 Aug 2019 14:27:55 -0700 Andrew Morton wrote: > > It's all a bit confusing. I'll drop > > mm-move-memcmp_pages-and-pages_identical.patch > uprobe-use-original-page-when-all-uprobes-are-removed.patch > uprobe-use-original-page-when-all-uprobes-are-removed-v2.patch >

Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 7 (mm/khugepaged.c)

2019-08-07 Thread Song Liu
> On Aug 7, 2019, at 2:27 PM, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Wed, 7 Aug 2019 21:00:04 + Song Liu wrote: > Shall I resend the patch, or shall I send fix on top of current patch? >>> >>> Either is OK. If the difference is small I will turn it into an >>> incremental patch so

Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 7 (mm/khugepaged.c)

2019-08-07 Thread Song Liu
> On Aug 7, 2019, at 2:30 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > On 8/7/19 2:27 PM, Andrew Morton wrote: >> On Wed, 7 Aug 2019 21:00:04 + Song Liu wrote: >> > > Shall I resend the patch, or shall I send fix on top of current patch? Either is OK. If the difference is small I

Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 7 (mm/khugepaged.c)

2019-08-07 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 8/7/19 2:27 PM, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Wed, 7 Aug 2019 21:00:04 + Song Liu wrote: > Shall I resend the patch, or shall I send fix on top of current patch? >>> >>> Either is OK. If the difference is small I will turn it into an >>> incremental patch so that I (and others) can

Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 7 (mm/khugepaged.c)

2019-08-07 Thread Andrew Morton
On Wed, 7 Aug 2019 21:00:04 + Song Liu wrote: > >> > >> Shall I resend the patch, or shall I send fix on top of current patch? > > > > Either is OK. If the difference is small I will turn it into an > > incremental patch so that I (and others) can see what changed. > > Please find the

Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 7 (mm/khugepaged.c)

2019-08-07 Thread Song Liu
Hi Andrew, > On Aug 7, 2019, at 1:10 PM, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Wed, 7 Aug 2019 16:59:14 + Song Liu wrote: > >> Hi Randy, >> >>> On Aug 7, 2019, at 8:11 AM, Randy Dunlap wrote: >>> >>> On 8/7/19 1:36 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: Hi all, Changes since 20190806:

Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 7 (mm/khugepaged.c)

2019-08-07 Thread Andrew Morton
On Wed, 7 Aug 2019 16:59:14 + Song Liu wrote: > Hi Randy, > > > On Aug 7, 2019, at 8:11 AM, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > > > On 8/7/19 1:36 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > >> Hi all, > >> > >> Changes since 20190806: > >> > > > > on i386: > > > > when CONFIG_SHMEM is not set/enabled: > > >

Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 7 (mm/khugepaged.c)

2019-08-07 Thread Song Liu
Hi Randy, > On Aug 7, 2019, at 8:11 AM, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > On 8/7/19 1:36 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Changes since 20190806: >> > > on i386: > > when CONFIG_SHMEM is not set/enabled: > > ../mm/khugepaged.c: In function ‘khugepaged_scan_mm_slot’: >

Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 7 (mm/khugepaged.c)

2019-08-07 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 8/7/19 1:36 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20190806: > on i386: when CONFIG_SHMEM is not set/enabled: ../mm/khugepaged.c: In function ‘khugepaged_scan_mm_slot’: ../mm/khugepaged.c:1874:2: error: implicit declaration of function