linux-next: Tree for Dec 11

2020-12-11 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20201210: The nand tree lost its build failure. The keys tree gained a build failure for which I applied a patch. The userns tree gained a conflict against the tip tree. The akpm-current tree gained a conflict against the tip tree. Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' t

Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 11

2018-12-20 Thread Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Em Wed, 19 Dec 2018 14:44:23 +1100 Stephen Rothwell escreveu: > Hi all, > > On Wed, 12 Dec 2018 09:36:32 +1100 Stephen Rothwell > wrote: > > > > On Tue, 11 Dec 2018 11:04:37 -0700 Nathan Chancellor > > wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 09:38:51AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote: >

Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 11

2018-12-18 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, On Wed, 12 Dec 2018 09:36:32 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > On Tue, 11 Dec 2018 11:04:37 -0700 Nathan Chancellor > wrote: > > > > On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 09:38:51AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > > Build results: > > > total: 152 pass: 150 fail: 2 > > > Failed builds: > > >

Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 11

2018-12-11 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Nathan, On Wed, 12 Dec 2018 09:36:32 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > I have added that patch after the v4l-dvb tree for today. (and cc'd > the v4l-dvb maintainer - who is also the author of the patch in the > Fixes tag ...) Sorry, I just realised that your original patch was sent to Mauro

Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 11

2018-12-11 Thread Guenter Roeck
On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 11:04:37AM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote: > On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 09:38:51AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 06:26:27PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > Changes since 20181210: > > > > > > The arm64 tree gained a conflict

Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 11

2018-12-11 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, On Tue, 11 Dec 2018 11:04:37 -0700 Nathan Chancellor wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 09:38:51AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > Build results: > > total: 152 pass: 150 fail: 2 > > Failed builds: > > arm:allmodconfig > > arm64:allmodconfig > > Qemu test results: > >

Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 11

2018-12-11 Thread Nathan Chancellor
On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 09:38:51AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 06:26:27PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Changes since 20181210: > > > > The arm64 tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree. > > > > The f2fs tree gained a conflict against the fscrypt

Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 11

2018-12-11 Thread Guenter Roeck
On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 06:26:27PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20181210: > > The arm64 tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree. > > The f2fs tree gained a conflict against the fscrypt tree. > > The ubifs tree gained a conflict against the fscrypt tree. > > The

linux-next: Tree for Dec 11

2018-12-10 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20181210: The arm64 tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree. The f2fs tree gained a conflict against the fscrypt tree. The ubifs tree gained a conflict against the fscrypt tree. The rdma tree still had its build failure so I used the version from next-20181203. The ti

linux-next: Tree for Dec 11

2017-12-10 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20171208: The clk tree gained build failures so I used the version from next-20171208. The v4l-dvb-next tree gained conflicts against the vfs tree. The akpm-current tree gained a build failure for which I added a fix patch. The akpm tree lost a patch that turned up elsewh

linux-next: Tree for Dec 11

2015-12-10 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20151210: *crickets* Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 4775 5512 files changed, 192545 insertions(+), 83027 deletions(-) I have created today's linux-next tree at git://git.kernel.org

linux-next: Tree for Dec 11

2014-12-11 Thread Stephen Rothwell
[I managed to get it finished after all, but the overnight builds will probably not happen until tomorrow.] Hi all, Please do not add any code destined for v3.20 to your linux-next included trees/branches until after v3.19-rc1 is released. Changes since 20141210: The net-next tree lost its buil

Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 11

2013-12-10 Thread Stephen Rothwell
On Wed, 11 Dec 2013 15:56:48 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 3141 > 3634 files changed, 143080 insertions(+), 83685 deletions(-) Actually: Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 3236 3756 files changed, 155884 insertions(+), 86331 deletions

linux-next: Tree for Dec 11

2013-12-10 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20131210: Removed tree: arm-v7-cache-opt (merged into the arm tree) The powerpc tree still had its build failure for which I applied a supplied patch. The sound-asoc tree lost its build failure. The usb-gadget tree still has its build failure so I used the version from ne