Hi Randy,
On Thu, 17 Dec 2020 08:46:03 -0800 Randy Dunlap wrote:
>
> on x86_64:
>
> (These are on 2 different builds.)
>
> > gcc --version
> gcc (SUSE Linux) 7.5.0
>
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.o: warning: objtool: do_cvt_mode() falls through to
> next function
On 12/16/20 9:53 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Please do not add any v5.12 destined code to your linux-next included
> branches until after v5.11-rc1 has been released.
>
> Changes since 20201216:
>
on x86_64:
(These are on 2 different builds.)
> gcc --version
gcc (SUSE Linux)
Hi all,
Please do not add any v5.12 destined code to your linux-next included
branches until after v5.11-rc1 has been released.
Changes since 20201216:
The watchdog tree still had its build failure so I used the version from
next-20201211.
The kvm tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree.
Hi Randy,
Thank you for the email. The error should be fixed with this patch [1].
Best regards,
Andrei
[1] -
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2018-December/621292.html
On 17.12.2018 18:03, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 12/17/18 3:09 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>>
On 12/17/18 3:09 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Changes since 20181214:
>
on i386:
# CONFIG_SUSPEND is not set
CONFIG_PM=y
CC drivers/regulator/mcp16502.o
In file included from ../include/linux/device.h:23:0,
from ../include/linux/gpio/driver.h:5,
Hi all,
Changes since 20181214:
New trees: hyperv-fixes, hyperv, auxdisplay
The nfs-anna tree gained a build failure for which I reverted a commit.
The hwmon-staging tree gained a build failure for which I applied a
merge fix patch.
The thermal tree gained a conflict against the kbuild tree.
Hi all,
Changes since 20151216:
News: The arm defconfig build is broken during the configrations stage.
The arm-soc tree gained a build failure for the arm defconfig build.
I left it broken for today.
The i2c tree still had its build failure for which I applied a patch.
The regulator tree
Hi all,
Changes since 20151216:
News: The arm defconfig build is broken during the configrations stage.
The arm-soc tree gained a build failure for the arm defconfig build.
I left it broken for today.
The i2c tree still had its build failure for which I applied a patch.
The regulator tree
Hi all,
Please do not add any code destined for v3.20 to your linux-next included
trees/branches until after v3.19-rc1 is released.
Changes since 20141216:
The infiniband tree lost its build failure.
The ipmi tree gained a build failure so I used the version form
next-20141216.
The clk tree
Hi all,
Please do not add any code destined for v3.20 to your linux-next included
trees/branches until after v3.19-rc1 is released.
Changes since 20141216:
The infiniband tree lost its build failure.
The ipmi tree gained a build failure so I used the version form
next-20141216.
The clk tree
Hi all,
Changes since 20131216:
Linus' tree still had its build failure for which I added a patch.
The powerpc tree still had its build failure for which I applied a
supplied patch.
The device-mapper tree gained a conflict against the block tree.
The mmc tree still had its build failure so I
Hi all,
Changes since 20131216:
Linus' tree still had its build failure for which I added a patch.
The powerpc tree still had its build failure for which I applied a
supplied patch.
The device-mapper tree gained a conflict against the block tree.
The mmc tree still had its build failure so I
Hi all,
Changes since 20121214:
Lots of conflicts are migrating between trees.
The btrfs tree gained a build failure so I used the version from
next-20121214.
The akpm tree lost a commit that turned up elsewhere.
I
Hi all,
Changes since 20121214:
Lots of conflicts are migrating between trees.
The btrfs tree gained a build failure so I used the version from
next-20121214.
The akpm tree lost a commit that turned up elsewhere.
I
14 matches
Mail list logo
