On 2/13/19 9:26 AM, Nick Crews wrote:
> Randy,
>
> No, I didn't test it, I'm sorry, of course I should done that.
> Sorry for the formatting too, I'm new to this and wasn't sure what
> tool to use. The following version of the patch was made with
> "git format-patch" and now I'm replying in plaint
Randy,
No, I didn't test it, I'm sorry, of course I should done that.
Sorry for the formatting too, I'm new to this and wasn't sure what
tool to use. The following version of the patch was made with
"git format-patch" and now I'm replying in plaintext, it hopefully is better.
>From 0cfb3db9706369
On 2/12/19 3:49 PM, Nick Crews wrote:
> OK, here is the patch to fix this problem. We had the dependency backwards.
>
> Should I re-send out the entire patch series to the LKML with this fix in it?
>
>
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/chrome/Kconfig b/drivers/platform/chrome/Kconfig
> index 462eb
On 2/12/19 3:49 PM, Nick Crews wrote:
> OK, here is the patch to fix this problem. We had the dependency backwards.
>
> Should I re-send out the entire patch series to the LKML with this fix in it?
>
>
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/chrome/Kconfig b/drivers/platform/chrome/Kconfig
> index 462eb
On 2/12/19 3:26 PM, Nick Crews wrote:
> Hi Randy,
>
> This looks like we have a bad dependency structure in our Kconfig. I'll
> figure it out, and then where should I send the patch?
AFAICT, all drivers/platform/chrome/ patches go to its maintainers (& to
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org):
CHROME H
On 2/11/19 10:50 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Changes since 20190211:
>
on i386 or x86_64:
ld: drivers/platform/chrome/wilco_ec/core.o: in function `wilco_ec_remove':
core.c:(.text+0x46): undefined reference to `cros_ec_lpc_mec_destroy'
ld: drivers/platform/chrome/wilco_ec/core.o:
6 matches
Mail list logo
