Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 17 (pinctrl-msm)

2014-02-25 Thread Linus Walleij
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 8:28 PM, Bjorn Andersson wrote: > This comes from the request of having everything as a module, to reduce the > size of the multi-platform ARM builds. I would say that the important part > related to that would be to keep the platform specific tables in modules. > > But

Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 17 (pinctrl-msm)

2014-02-25 Thread Linus Walleij
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 7:41 PM, Josh Cartwright wrote: > On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 10:14:45AM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote: > Without too much effort, I can get this to fail just by making > CONFIG_PINCTRL_MSM=m. handle_bad_irq isn't marked EXPORT_SYMBOL*, so > hence the warning. > > Whether or not

Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 17 (pinctrl-msm)

2014-02-25 Thread Linus Walleij
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 7:41 PM, Josh Cartwright jo...@codeaurora.org wrote: On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 10:14:45AM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote: Without too much effort, I can get this to fail just by making CONFIG_PINCTRL_MSM=m. handle_bad_irq isn't marked EXPORT_SYMBOL*, so hence the warning.

Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 17 (pinctrl-msm)

2014-02-25 Thread Linus Walleij
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 8:28 PM, Bjorn Andersson bjorn.anders...@sonymobile.com wrote: This comes from the request of having everything as a module, to reduce the size of the multi-platform ARM builds. I would say that the important part related to that would be to keep the platform specific

Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 17 (pinctrl-msm)

2014-02-24 Thread Bjorn Andersson
On Mon 24 Feb 10:41 PST 2014, Josh Cartwright wrote: [...] > > Without too much effort, I can get this to fail just by making > CONFIG_PINCTRL_MSM=m. handle_bad_irq isn't marked EXPORT_SYMBOL*, so > hence the warning. > Ohh, yeah I missed that. > Whether or not this is intentional is not

Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 17 (pinctrl-msm)

2014-02-24 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 02/24/2014 10:41 AM, Josh Cartwright wrote: > On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 10:14:45AM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote: >> On 02/24/2014 09:46 AM, Bjorn Andersson wrote: >>> On Mon 24 Feb 06:46 PST 2014, Linus Walleij wrote: On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 6:33 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On

Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 17 (pinctrl-msm)

2014-02-24 Thread Josh Cartwright
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 10:14:45AM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 02/24/2014 09:46 AM, Bjorn Andersson wrote: > > On Mon 24 Feb 06:46 PST 2014, Linus Walleij wrote: > >> On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 6:33 PM, Randy Dunlap > >> wrote: > >>> On 02/16/2014 10:23 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > >>> ERROR:

Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 17 (pinctrl-msm)

2014-02-24 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 02/24/2014 09:46 AM, Bjorn Andersson wrote: > On Mon 24 Feb 06:46 PST 2014, Linus Walleij wrote: > >> On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 6:33 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote: >>> On 02/16/2014 10:23 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: Hi all, If you see failures in building this tree due to missing

Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 17 (pinctrl-msm)

2014-02-24 Thread Bjorn Andersson
On Mon 24 Feb 06:46 PST 2014, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 6:33 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > On 02/16/2014 10:23 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > >> Hi all, > >> > >> If you see failures in building this tree due to missing declarations of > >> k..alloc/free, then it may be caused

Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 17 (pinctrl-msm)

2014-02-24 Thread Linus Walleij
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 6:33 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 02/16/2014 10:23 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> If you see failures in building this tree due to missing declarations of >> k..alloc/free, then it may be caused by commit 2bd59d48ebfb ("cgroup: >> convert to kernfs"). Please

Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 17 (pinctrl-msm)

2014-02-24 Thread Linus Walleij
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 6:33 PM, Randy Dunlap rdun...@infradead.org wrote: On 02/16/2014 10:23 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: Hi all, If you see failures in building this tree due to missing declarations of k..alloc/free, then it may be caused by commit 2bd59d48ebfb (cgroup: convert to kernfs).

Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 17 (pinctrl-msm)

2014-02-24 Thread Bjorn Andersson
On Mon 24 Feb 06:46 PST 2014, Linus Walleij wrote: On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 6:33 PM, Randy Dunlap rdun...@infradead.org wrote: On 02/16/2014 10:23 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: Hi all, If you see failures in building this tree due to missing declarations of k..alloc/free, then it may be

Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 17 (pinctrl-msm)

2014-02-24 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 02/24/2014 09:46 AM, Bjorn Andersson wrote: On Mon 24 Feb 06:46 PST 2014, Linus Walleij wrote: On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 6:33 PM, Randy Dunlap rdun...@infradead.org wrote: On 02/16/2014 10:23 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: Hi all, If you see failures in building this tree due to missing

Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 17 (pinctrl-msm)

2014-02-24 Thread Josh Cartwright
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 10:14:45AM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote: On 02/24/2014 09:46 AM, Bjorn Andersson wrote: On Mon 24 Feb 06:46 PST 2014, Linus Walleij wrote: On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 6:33 PM, Randy Dunlap rdun...@infradead.org wrote: On 02/16/2014 10:23 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:

Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 17 (pinctrl-msm)

2014-02-24 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 02/24/2014 10:41 AM, Josh Cartwright wrote: On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 10:14:45AM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote: On 02/24/2014 09:46 AM, Bjorn Andersson wrote: On Mon 24 Feb 06:46 PST 2014, Linus Walleij wrote: On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 6:33 PM, Randy Dunlap rdun...@infradead.org wrote: On

Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 17 (pinctrl-msm)

2014-02-24 Thread Bjorn Andersson
On Mon 24 Feb 10:41 PST 2014, Josh Cartwright wrote: [...] Without too much effort, I can get this to fail just by making CONFIG_PINCTRL_MSM=m. handle_bad_irq isn't marked EXPORT_SYMBOL*, so hence the warning. Ohh, yeah I missed that. Whether or not this is intentional is not clear.

Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 17 (pinctrl-msm)

2014-02-17 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 02/16/2014 10:23 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > If you see failures in building this tree due to missing declarations of > k..alloc/free, then it may be caused by commit 2bd59d48ebfb ("cgroup: > convert to kernfs"). Please send Tejun Heo a patch > adding an inclusion of

Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 17 (pinctrl-msm)

2014-02-17 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 02/16/2014 10:23 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: Hi all, If you see failures in building this tree due to missing declarations of k..alloc/free, then it may be caused by commit 2bd59d48ebfb (cgroup: convert to kernfs). Please send Tejun Heo t...@kernel.org a patch adding an inclusion of