linux-next: Tree for Feb 3

2021-02-03 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20210202: The drm-misc tree lost ts build failure. The tip tree still had its boot failure so I reverted a commit. Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 7462 7837 files changed, 290817 insertions(+), 222309 deletions(-)

linux-next: Tree for Feb 3

2017-02-02 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20170202: Dropped tree: vfs-miklos (build failure and out of date) The powerpc tree gained a conflict against the powerpc-fixes tree. The vfs-miklos tree still had its build failure, so I just dropped it again for today. The v4l-dvb tree still had its build failure so I u

Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 3 (i386: redef. of native_pud_clear)

2016-02-03 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 02/02/16 21:18, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20160202: > on i386: CC arch/x86/kernel/asm-offsets.s In file included from ../include/linux/mm.h:67:0, from ../include/linux/suspend.h:8, from ../arch/x86/kernel/asm-offsets.c:12: ..

Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 3 (mm, hugepage)

2016-02-03 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 02/02/16 21:18, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20160202: > on x86_64: when CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE_PUD is enabled and CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE is not enabled: ../fs/proc/task_mmu.c: In function 'smaps_pud_range': ../fs/proc/task_mmu.c:596:2: error: impl

linux-next: Tree for Feb 3

2016-02-02 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20160202: The btrfs-kdave lost its build failure. The tip tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree. The gpio tree still had its build failure so I used the version from next-20160128. The aio tree still had a build failure so I used the version from next-20160111. The

Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 3 (arc:defconfig build failure)

2015-02-03 Thread Guenter Roeck
On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 02:07:48PM -0500, Peter Hurley wrote: > On 02/03/2015 01:42 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 06:20:10PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > >> Hi all, > >> > >> Changes since 20150202: > >> > >> The target-updates tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree.

Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 3 (arc:defconfig build failure)

2015-02-03 Thread Peter Hurley
On 02/03/2015 01:42 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 06:20:10PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Changes since 20150202: >> >> The target-updates tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree. >> >> The clk tree gained conflicts against the arm-soc tree. >> >> Non-merg

Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 3 (arc:defconfig build failure)

2015-02-03 Thread Guenter Roeck
On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 06:20:10PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20150202: > > The target-updates tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree. > > The clk tree gained conflicts against the arm-soc tree. > > Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 7173 > 7143 fi

linux-next: Tree for Feb 3

2015-02-02 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20150202: The target-updates tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree. The clk tree gained conflicts against the arm-soc tree. Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 7173 7143 files changed, 301126 insertions(+), 167764 deletions(-) --

Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 3 (sound/soc/soc-io.c)

2014-02-03 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 02/02/2014 07:16 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > This tree fails (more than usual) the powerpc allyesconfig build. > > Changes since 20140131: > on i386: when CONFIG_REGMAP_I2C=m: sound/built-in.o: In function `snd_soc_codec_set_cache_io': (.text+0x29555): undefined reference to `

linux-next: Tree for Feb 3

2014-02-02 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, This tree fails (more than usual) the powerpc allyesconfig build. Changes since 20140131: Dropped tree: btrfs (needs cleaning up) The powerpc tree still had its build failure. The btrfs tree had lost of conflicts against Linus' tree so I dropped it for today. Non-merge commits (relati