Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 6 (drivers/edac/skx* and i10nm)

2019-02-06 Thread Luck, Tony
On Wed, Feb 06, 2019 at 01:11:23PM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote: > on x86_64: > > ld: drivers/edac/skx_common.o: in function `skx_mce_check_error': > skx_common.c:(.text+0x982): undefined reference to `adxl_decode' > ld: drivers/edac/skx_common.o: in function `skx_adxl_get': > skx_common.c:(.init.tex

Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 6 (drivers/edac/skx* and i10nm)

2019-02-06 Thread Borislav Petkov
On Wed, Feb 06, 2019 at 01:11:23PM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote: > CONFIG_EDAC_I10NM=y > but CONFIG_EDAC_SKX is not set. > since # CONFIG_ACPI is not set > > Should EDAC_I10NM depend on ACPI also? This should do it: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bp/bp.git/commit/?h=for-next&id=d6a

Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 6 (drivers/edac/skx* and i10nm)

2019-02-06 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 2/5/19 10:00 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20190205: > > The mips tree gained conflicts against the mips-fixes tree. > > The opp tree gained a conflict against the pm tree. > > The drm-intel tree gained a conflict against the drm tree. > > The akpm-current tree gai

linux-next: Tree for Feb 6

2019-02-05 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20190205: The mips tree gained conflicts against the mips-fixes tree. The opp tree gained a conflict against the pm tree. The drm-intel tree gained a conflict against the drm tree. The akpm-current tree gained a conflict against the powerpc-fixes tree. Non-merge commits

linux-next: Tree for Feb 6

2018-02-05 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Please do not add any v4.17 material to your linux-next included branches until after v4.16-rc1 has been released. Changes since 20180205: Linus' tree lost its build failure. The tip tree gained conflicts against Linus' tree. The akpm tree lost a patch that turned up elsewhere. Non-me

linux-next: Tree for Feb 6

2017-02-05 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20170203: New trees: v4l-dvb-fixes, v4l-dvb-next Undropped tree: vfs-miklos The arm64 tree gained conflicts against the qcom tree. The vfs-miklos tree lost its build failure. The v4l-dvb tree lost its build failure. The drm tree gained a conflict against the net-next tr

linux-next: Tree for Feb 6

2014-02-05 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, This tree fails (more than usual) the powerpc allyesconfig build. Changes since 20140205: The powerpc tree still had its build failure. The fscache tree gained a build failure so I used the version from next-20140205. Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 1225 998 files changed

Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 6 [WARNING: at kernel/sched/clock.c:219 sched_clock_cpu+0xf9/0x110()]

2013-02-07 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 9:49 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 9:23 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 8:43 AM, Stephen Rothwell >> wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Changes since 20130204: >>> >>> The metag tree gained a conflict against the arc tree. >>> >>> I added a coup