Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 10 (iwlwifi)

2019-01-11 Thread Kalle Valo
Randy Dunlap writes: > On 1/9/19 8:14 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Changes since 20190109: >> > > on x86_64: > > WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for MAC80211_LEDS > Depends on [n]: NET [=y] && WIRELESS [=y] && MAC80211 [=n] && LEDS_CLASS > [=y] > Selected by [y]

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 10 (iwlwifi)

2019-01-10 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 1/9/19 8:14 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20190109: > on x86_64: WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for MAC80211_LEDS Depends on [n]: NET [=y] && WIRELESS [=y] && MAC80211 [=n] && LEDS_CLASS [=y] Selected by [y]: - IWLWIFI_LEDS [=y] && NETDEVICES [=y]

linux-next: Tree for Jan 10

2019-01-09 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20190109: The vfs tree still had its build failure for which I applied a patch. The drm-misc tree lost its build failure. Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 1367 1384 files changed, 42473 insertions(+), 21762 deletions(-) ---

linux-next: Tree for Jan 10

2018-01-09 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20180109: The net-next tree gained a conflict against the vfs tree. it also gained a build failure for which I applied a patch. The akpm-current tree still had its build failure for which I applied a patch. Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 8051 8389 files chan

linux-next: Tree for Jan 10

2017-01-09 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20170109: New tree: printk The net-next tree gained a build failure for which I applied a merge fix patch. The selinux tree gained a build failure for which I applied a merge fix patch. The y2038 tree gained a conflict against the net-next tree. Non-merge commits (relati

linux-next: Tree for Jan 10

2014-01-09 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, This tree fails (more than usual) the powerpc allyesconfig build. Changes since 20140109: Removed tree: ubi (at maintainers request) Dropped tree: sh (complex merge conflicts against very old commits) The powerpc tree still had its build failure. The kvm tree gained a build failure so

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 10 (staging/sb105x)

2013-01-11 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 02:06:34PM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 01/10/13 12:50, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > On Thu, 2013-01-10 at 11:08 -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote: > >> On 01/09/13 19:32, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > >>> Hi all, > >>> > >>> Changes since 20130109: > >>> > >> > >> on x86_64, when CONFI

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 10 (staging/sb105x)

2013-01-10 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 01/10/13 12:50, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Thu, 2013-01-10 at 11:08 -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote: >> On 01/09/13 19:32, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Changes since 20130109: >>> >> >> on x86_64, when CONFIG_PARPORT_PC is not enabled: >> >> drivers/built-in.o: In function `multi_init':

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 10 (staging/sb105x)

2013-01-10 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Thu, 2013-01-10 at 11:08 -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 01/09/13 19:32, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Changes since 20130109: > > > > on x86_64, when CONFIG_PARPORT_PC is not enabled: > > drivers/built-in.o: In function `multi_init': > sb_pci_mp.c:(.init.text+0x15684): undefin

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 10 (vmci)

2013-01-10 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 01/10/13 11:17, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 01/09/13 19:32, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Changes since 20130109: >> > > > on i386, when CONFIG_PCI is not enabled: > > CC [M] drivers/misc/vmw_vmci/vmci_guest.o > drivers/misc/vmw_vmci/vmci_guest.c:58:20: error: array type has incomp

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 10 (vmci)

2013-01-10 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 01/09/13 19:32, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20130109: > on i386, when CONFIG_PCI is not enabled: CC [M] drivers/misc/vmw_vmci/vmci_guest.o drivers/misc/vmw_vmci/vmci_guest.c:58:20: error: array type has incomplete element type drivers/misc/vmw_vmci/vmci_guest.c:

linux-next: Tree for Jan 10

2013-01-09 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20130109: The pm tree gained a conflict against the pci tree. I have created today's linux-next tree at git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git (patches at http://www.ker