linux-next: Tree for Jan 13

2021-01-12 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20210112: New tree: iomem-mmap-vs-gup The drm tree still had its build failure so I used the version from next-20210107. The drm-intel tree gained a build failure from merging the drm tree, so I have used the version from next-20210108. The drm-misc tree still had its

linux-next: Tree for Jan 13

2017-01-12 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20170112: The akpm-current tree lost its build failure. Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 3176 4027 files changed, 124734 insertions(+), 67998 deletions(-) I have created today's

linux-next: Tree for Jan 13

2017-01-12 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20170112: The akpm-current tree lost its build failure. Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 3176 4027 files changed, 124734 insertions(+), 67998 deletions(-) I have created today's

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 13 (arm build failure)

2015-01-13 Thread Olof Johansson
Hi, On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 1:21 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 05:41:28PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Changes since 20150112: >> >> The imx-mxs tree gained a conflict against the arm-soc tree. >> >> The mvebu tree gained a conflict against the arm-soc

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 13 (arm build failure)

2015-01-13 Thread Guenter Roeck
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 05:41:28PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20150112: > > The imx-mxs tree gained a conflict against the arm-soc tree. > > The mvebu tree gained a conflict against the arm-soc tree. > > The net-next tree lost its build failure. > > The

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 13 (arm build failure)

2015-01-13 Thread Guenter Roeck
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 05:41:28PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: Hi all, Changes since 20150112: The imx-mxs tree gained a conflict against the arm-soc tree. The mvebu tree gained a conflict against the arm-soc tree. The net-next tree lost its build failure. The usb-gadget tree

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 13 (arm build failure)

2015-01-13 Thread Olof Johansson
Hi, On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 1:21 PM, Guenter Roeck li...@roeck-us.net wrote: On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 05:41:28PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: Hi all, Changes since 20150112: The imx-mxs tree gained a conflict against the arm-soc tree. The mvebu tree gained a conflict against the arm-soc

linux-next: Tree for Jan 13

2015-01-12 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20150112: The imx-mxs tree gained a conflict against the arm-soc tree. The mvebu tree gained a conflict against the arm-soc tree. The net-next tree lost its build failure. The usb-gadget tree gained conflicts against the usb.current tree. The pinctrl tree lost its build

linux-next: Tree for Jan 13

2015-01-12 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20150112: The imx-mxs tree gained a conflict against the arm-soc tree. The mvebu tree gained a conflict against the arm-soc tree. The net-next tree lost its build failure. The usb-gadget tree gained conflicts against the usb.current tree. The pinctrl tree lost its build

linux-next: Tree for Jan 13

2014-01-12 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, This tree fails (more than usual) the powerpc allyesconfig build. Changes since 20140110: Dropped tree: sh (complex merge conflicts against very old commits) The powerpc tree still had its build failure. The sound-asoc tree gained a conflict against the slave-dma tree. The mmc tree

linux-next: Tree for Jan 13

2014-01-12 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, This tree fails (more than usual) the powerpc allyesconfig build. Changes since 20140110: Dropped tree: sh (complex merge conflicts against very old commits) The powerpc tree still had its build failure. The sound-asoc tree gained a conflict against the slave-dma tree. The mmc tree