Hi all,
Changes since 20190122:
The vfs tree still had its build failure for which I applied a patch.
The netfilter-next tree lost its build failures.
The slave-dma tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree.
Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 3027
3265 files changed, 99661
Hi all,
Changes since 20170120:
The vfs tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree.
Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 4596
5281 files changed, 169240 insertions(+), 99700 deletions(-)
I have created
Hi all,
Changes since 20170120:
The vfs tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree.
Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 4596
5281 files changed, 169240 insertions(+), 99700 deletions(-)
I have created
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 06:10:29PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> There will be no linux-next release on Monday (next-20150126).
>
> Changes since 20150122:
>
> Added tree: kvms390
> Removed tree: documentation (at maintainers request)
>
> The vfs tree gained a conflict against
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 06:10:29PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
There will be no linux-next release on Monday (next-20150126).
Changes since 20150122:
Added tree: kvms390
Removed tree: documentation (at maintainers request)
The vfs tree gained a conflict against Linus'
Hi all,
There will be no linux-next release on Monday (next-20150126).
Changes since 20150122:
Added tree: kvms390
Removed tree: documentation (at maintainers request)
The vfs tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree.
The akpm tree lost a patch that turned up elsewhere.
Non-merge
Hi all,
There will be no linux-next release on Monday (next-20150126).
Changes since 20150122:
Added tree: kvms390
Removed tree: documentation (at maintainers request)
The vfs tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree.
The akpm tree lost a patch that turned up elsewhere.
Non-merge
On 14-01-23 01:38 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> On Thu, 23 Jan 2014 17:21:09 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
>>
>> Changes since 20140122:
>>
>> The init tree lost one of its patches.
>
> It turns out that I merged yesterday's version of the init tree again
> today (so the fixes
On 14-01-23 01:38 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi Paul,
On Thu, 23 Jan 2014 17:21:09 +1100 Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au
wrote:
Changes since 20140122:
The init tree lost one of its patches.
It turns out that I merged yesterday's version of the init tree again
today (so the
Hi Paul,
On Thu, 23 Jan 2014 17:21:09 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> Changes since 20140122:
>
> The init tree lost one of its patches.
It turns out that I merged yesterday's version of the init tree again
today (so the fixes that went in do not appear). Sorry about that, I
will try to do
Hi all,
This tree fails (more than usual) the powerpc allyesconfig build.
Changes since 20140122:
Removed trees: sh, sh-current
Dropped tree: imx-mxs (complex merge conflicts against the arm tree)
The powerpc tree still had its build failure.
The arm-soc tree gained a conflict against Linus'
Hi all,
This tree fails (more than usual) the powerpc allyesconfig build.
Changes since 20140122:
Removed trees: sh, sh-current
Dropped tree: imx-mxs (complex merge conflicts against the arm tree)
The powerpc tree still had its build failure.
The arm-soc tree gained a conflict against Linus'
Hi Paul,
On Thu, 23 Jan 2014 17:21:09 +1100 Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au
wrote:
Changes since 20140122:
The init tree lost one of its patches.
It turns out that I merged yesterday's version of the init tree again
today (so the fixes that went in do not appear). Sorry about that,
On 01/23/2013 11:41 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 01/23/13 15:23, Herbert Xu wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 03:10:01PM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>>> On 01/22/13 22:43, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
Changes since 20130122:
>>>
>>>
>>> on i386:
>>>
>>> ERROR: "crc32_le"
On 01/23/2013 11:41 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
On 01/23/13 15:23, Herbert Xu wrote:
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 03:10:01PM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
On 01/22/13 22:43, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
Changes since 20130122:
on i386:
ERROR: crc32_le [drivers/mtd/ubi/ubi.ko] undefined!
ERROR:
On 2013-01-24 12:15, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 24 Jan 2013 10:30:54 +0800 Liang Li wrote:
> >
> > Should I add a fix for the compile error .. or do squash then send out
> > refreshed patch ?
>
> You need to send a fix patch to Greg based on his tty tree
>
Hi,
On Thu, 24 Jan 2013 10:30:54 +0800 Liang Li wrote:
>
> Should I add a fix for the compile error .. or do squash then send out
> refreshed patch ?
You need to send a fix patch to Greg based on his tty tree
(git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/tty.git).
--
Cheers,
Stephen
On 2013-01-24 10:06, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Jan 2013 15:28:38 -0800 Randy Dunlap wrote:
> >
> > on i386:
> >
> > CC [M] drivers/tty/serial/pch_uart.o
> > drivers/tty/serial/pch_uart.c: In function 'pch_uart_hal_read':
> > drivers/tty/serial/pch_uart.c:572:11: error: 'struct
On Wed, 23 Jan 2013 15:28:38 -0800 Randy Dunlap wrote:
>
> on i386:
>
> CC [M] drivers/tty/serial/pch_uart.o
> drivers/tty/serial/pch_uart.c: In function 'pch_uart_hal_read':
> drivers/tty/serial/pch_uart.c:572:11: error: 'struct uart_port' has no member
> named 'sysrq'
> make[4]: ***
On 01/23/13 15:23, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 03:10:01PM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>> On 01/22/13 22:43, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Changes since 20130122:
>>>
>>
>>
>> on i386:
>>
>> ERROR: "crc32_le" [drivers/mtd/ubi/ubi.ko] undefined!
>> ERROR:
On 01/22/13 22:43, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Changes since 20130122:
>
on i386:
CC [M] drivers/tty/serial/pch_uart.o
drivers/tty/serial/pch_uart.c: In function 'pch_uart_hal_read':
drivers/tty/serial/pch_uart.c:572:11: error: 'struct uart_port' has no member
named 'sysrq'
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 03:10:01PM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 01/22/13 22:43, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Changes since 20130122:
> >
>
>
> on i386:
>
> ERROR: "crc32_le" [drivers/mtd/ubi/ubi.ko] undefined!
> ERROR: "iio_triggered_buffer_setup"
On 01/22/13 22:43, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Changes since 20130122:
>
on i386:
ERROR: "crc32_le" [drivers/mtd/ubi/ubi.ko] undefined!
ERROR: "iio_triggered_buffer_setup" [drivers/iio/adc/max1363.ko] undefined!
ERROR: "iio_triggered_buffer_cleanup" [drivers/iio/adc/max1363.ko]
Hi all,
Mauro pointed out that I forgot the merge summery yesterday. Here it is:
On Wed, 23 Jan 2013 17:43:36 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> Changes since 20130122:
$ git checkout master
$ git reset --hard stable
Merging origin/master (262060e Merge branch 'for-linus' of
Hi all,
Mauro pointed out that I forgot the merge summery yesterday. Here it is:
On Wed, 23 Jan 2013 17:43:36 +1100 Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au
wrote:
Changes since 20130122:
$ git checkout master
$ git reset --hard stable
Merging origin/master (262060e Merge branch 'for-linus'
On 01/22/13 22:43, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
Changes since 20130122:
on i386:
ERROR: crc32_le [drivers/mtd/ubi/ubi.ko] undefined!
ERROR: iio_triggered_buffer_setup [drivers/iio/adc/max1363.ko] undefined!
ERROR: iio_triggered_buffer_cleanup [drivers/iio/adc/max1363.ko] undefined!
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 03:10:01PM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
On 01/22/13 22:43, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
Changes since 20130122:
on i386:
ERROR: crc32_le [drivers/mtd/ubi/ubi.ko] undefined!
ERROR: iio_triggered_buffer_setup [drivers/iio/adc/max1363.ko] undefined!
On 01/22/13 22:43, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
Changes since 20130122:
on i386:
CC [M] drivers/tty/serial/pch_uart.o
drivers/tty/serial/pch_uart.c: In function 'pch_uart_hal_read':
drivers/tty/serial/pch_uart.c:572:11: error: 'struct uart_port' has no member
named 'sysrq'
make[4]:
On 01/23/13 15:23, Herbert Xu wrote:
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 03:10:01PM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
On 01/22/13 22:43, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
Changes since 20130122:
on i386:
ERROR: crc32_le [drivers/mtd/ubi/ubi.ko] undefined!
ERROR: iio_triggered_buffer_setup
On Wed, 23 Jan 2013 15:28:38 -0800 Randy Dunlap rdun...@infradead.org wrote:
on i386:
CC [M] drivers/tty/serial/pch_uart.o
drivers/tty/serial/pch_uart.c: In function 'pch_uart_hal_read':
drivers/tty/serial/pch_uart.c:572:11: error: 'struct uart_port' has no member
named 'sysrq'
On 2013-01-24 10:06, Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au wrote:
On Wed, 23 Jan 2013 15:28:38 -0800 Randy Dunlap rdun...@infradead.org wrote:
on i386:
CC [M] drivers/tty/serial/pch_uart.o
drivers/tty/serial/pch_uart.c: In function 'pch_uart_hal_read':
Hi,
On Thu, 24 Jan 2013 10:30:54 +0800 Liang Li liang...@windriver.com wrote:
Should I add a fix for the compile error .. or do squash then send out
refreshed patch ?
You need to send a fix patch to Greg based on his tty tree
(git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/tty.git).
--
On 2013-01-24 12:15, Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 24 Jan 2013 10:30:54 +0800 Liang Li liang...@windriver.com wrote:
Should I add a fix for the compile error .. or do squash then send out
refreshed patch ?
You need to send a fix patch to Greg based on his
Hi all,
Changes since 20130122:
The powerpc tree still had a build failure.
The wireless-next tree gained conflicts against the net and linus' trees.
The sound-asoc tree gained a build failure so I used the version from
next-20130122.
The trivial tree gained conflicts against the mips and pm
Hi all,
Changes since 20130122:
The powerpc tree still had a build failure.
The wireless-next tree gained conflicts against the net and linus' trees.
The sound-asoc tree gained a build failure so I used the version from
next-20130122.
The trivial tree gained conflicts against the mips and pm
35 matches
Mail list logo
