On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 11:06:11PM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> I don't see that git-bisect session as a time of waste, but two hints:
>
> 1. People should sent their patches concerning especially Linux-Next
> fixes not only to LKML but also to (if
> this is not known, pointing to James).
>
> 2.
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 11:08 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello, Sedat.
>
> On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 11:06:11PM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote:
>> 1. People should sent their patches concerning especially Linux-Next
>> fixes not only to LKML but also to (if
>> this is not known, pointing to James).
>>
>> 2.
Hello, Sedat.
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 11:06:11PM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> 1. People should sent their patches concerning especially Linux-Next
> fixes not only to LKML but also to (if
> this is not known, pointing to James).
>
> 2. These patches for Linux-Next should contain a "-next" in thei
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 8:28 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello, guys.
>
> On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 02:01:50PM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote:
>> OK, that bisecting ruined a bit my weekend and showed me again you
>> cannot really bisect Linux-Next.
>> Sometimes, it is better not to trust the tools blindly and
Hello, guys.
On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 02:01:50PM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> OK, that bisecting ruined a bit my weekend and showed me again you
> cannot really bisect Linux-Next.
> Sometimes, it is better not to trust the tools blindly and do a
> bisect-on-suspicion.
> Anyway... cultprit found... p
On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 10:49 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Saturday, January 26, 2013 07:27:06 PM Sedat Dilek wrote:
>> On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 4:05 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
>> > On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 3:33 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
>> >> On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 2:24 PM, Sedat Dilek
>> >> wro
On Saturday, January 26, 2013 07:27:06 PM Sedat Dilek wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 4:05 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 3:33 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> >> On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 2:24 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> >>> On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 2:25 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >
On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 4:05 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 3:33 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
>> On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 2:24 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
>>> On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 2:25 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Saturday, January 26, 2013 12:10:32 PM Sedat Dilek wrote:
>
On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 3:33 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 2:24 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
>> On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 2:25 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>> On Saturday, January 26, 2013 12:10:32 PM Sedat Dilek wrote:
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 6:26 AM, Stephen Rothwell
wr
On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 2:24 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 2:25 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> On Saturday, January 26, 2013 12:10:32 PM Sedat Dilek wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 6:26 AM, Stephen Rothwell
>>> wrote:
>>> > Hi all,
>>> >
>>> > Changes since 20130124:
>>>
On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 2:25 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Saturday, January 26, 2013 12:10:32 PM Sedat Dilek wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 6:26 AM, Stephen Rothwell
>> wrote:
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > Changes since 20130124:
>> >
>> > New trees: ipsec and ipsec-next
>> >
>> > The powerpc t
On Saturday, January 26, 2013 12:10:32 PM Sedat Dilek wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 6:26 AM, Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Changes since 20130124:
> >
> > New trees: ipsec and ipsec-next
> >
> > The powerpc tree still had a build failure.
> >
> > The sound-asoc tree still had i
On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 12:10 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 6:26 AM, Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Changes since 20130124:
>>
>> New trees: ipsec and ipsec-next
>>
>> The powerpc tree still had a build failure.
>>
>> The sound-asoc tree still had its build failure
13 matches
Mail list logo
